Red sign hanging at the glass door of a shop saying "Closed due to coronavirus." (Image: Getty Images)
'Unconscionable': As Unemployment Claims Tick Upward, GOP Seeks to Gut $600 Weekly Benefit
"A disaster of Congress' making is looming for those who have lost their livelihoods during the global pandemic."
As U.S. lawmakers debate the details of extending or cutting federal unemployment benefits that have helped Americans weather the Covid-19 pandemic, jobless numbers rose for the first time in three months last week as millions remain out of work.
"Congress needs to act immediately," Economic Policy Institute (EPI) director of policy Heidi Shierholz wrote Thursday of the need for an extension of the $600 unemployment benefit. "If they let the extra payments expire and then reinstate them, it will be a needless administrative nightmare for state agencies, and recipients--who will face a lapse in benefits several weeks in most states--will pay the price."
Thursday's unemployment numbers hit 2.3 million, Shierholz wrote, once you combine the 1.4 million regular unemployment claims with the number of claimants for the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program passed as part of the CARES Act economic stimulus.
The economic crisis is nowhere near over, she added, and without swift action from lawmakers on benefit extensions things could get far worse.
"A disaster of Congress' making is looming for those who have lost their livelihoods during the global pandemic," wrote Shierholz.
As Common Dreams reported, GOP leaders have suggested replacing the $600 weekly benefit with a $100 weekly payment, a move that EPI researcher Josh Bivens called "both cruel and stupid."
In a statement, Andrew Stettner, senior fellow at The Century Foundation, said that in light of Thursday's numbers, "not extending the weekly $600 benefit supplement would be unconscionable."
"When Congress put into place the CARES Act benefits, 8.2 million workers were collecting unemployment. Taking into account the 13 million claims for PUA (which will continue through December 31), there are a total of 33.8 million workers filing for unemployment this week," Stettner said. "Given these realities, it's preposterous that Senate leaders are floating a $100 weekly supplement at a time when there is no end in sight to economic distress."
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin on Thursday told CNBC that the administration and Senate Republicans were close to a deal that would keep the benefit at what the Washington Post estimated would be around $200 with a 70% wage replacement.
"We're not going to continue in its current form because we're not going to pay people more money to stay at home than work," the secretary said. "We want to make sure that the people out there who can't find jobs do get a reasonable wage replacement--so it will be based on approximately 70 percent wage replacement."
House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) followed Mnuchin on the network and said that ending the benefit was not "the policy we ought to pursue," adding that any drop in the unemployment help should be done "over time" if at all.
"At this stage, you're seeing all the wrong elements for recovery," Gregory Daco, chief United States economist at analyst firm Oxford Economics, told the New York Times. "A deteriorating health situation, a weakening labor market, and a softening path for demand."
In a statement, Groundwork Collaborative executive director Michael Linden noted the economic damage that ending the benefit would cause and called on Congress to act quickly to extend the payments.
"Not only would it be morally reprehensible for President Trump and his conservative allies to cut the income of 30 million families during a pandemic, it would also be devastating for an economy that is already severely damaged and heading in the wrong direction," said Linden.
"Congress must move quickly to do the right thing for families and the economy and extend these expanded benefits until this crisis is finally truly over," he added.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
As U.S. lawmakers debate the details of extending or cutting federal unemployment benefits that have helped Americans weather the Covid-19 pandemic, jobless numbers rose for the first time in three months last week as millions remain out of work.
"Congress needs to act immediately," Economic Policy Institute (EPI) director of policy Heidi Shierholz wrote Thursday of the need for an extension of the $600 unemployment benefit. "If they let the extra payments expire and then reinstate them, it will be a needless administrative nightmare for state agencies, and recipients--who will face a lapse in benefits several weeks in most states--will pay the price."
Thursday's unemployment numbers hit 2.3 million, Shierholz wrote, once you combine the 1.4 million regular unemployment claims with the number of claimants for the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program passed as part of the CARES Act economic stimulus.
The economic crisis is nowhere near over, she added, and without swift action from lawmakers on benefit extensions things could get far worse.
"A disaster of Congress' making is looming for those who have lost their livelihoods during the global pandemic," wrote Shierholz.
As Common Dreams reported, GOP leaders have suggested replacing the $600 weekly benefit with a $100 weekly payment, a move that EPI researcher Josh Bivens called "both cruel and stupid."
In a statement, Andrew Stettner, senior fellow at The Century Foundation, said that in light of Thursday's numbers, "not extending the weekly $600 benefit supplement would be unconscionable."
"When Congress put into place the CARES Act benefits, 8.2 million workers were collecting unemployment. Taking into account the 13 million claims for PUA (which will continue through December 31), there are a total of 33.8 million workers filing for unemployment this week," Stettner said. "Given these realities, it's preposterous that Senate leaders are floating a $100 weekly supplement at a time when there is no end in sight to economic distress."
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin on Thursday told CNBC that the administration and Senate Republicans were close to a deal that would keep the benefit at what the Washington Post estimated would be around $200 with a 70% wage replacement.
"We're not going to continue in its current form because we're not going to pay people more money to stay at home than work," the secretary said. "We want to make sure that the people out there who can't find jobs do get a reasonable wage replacement--so it will be based on approximately 70 percent wage replacement."
House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) followed Mnuchin on the network and said that ending the benefit was not "the policy we ought to pursue," adding that any drop in the unemployment help should be done "over time" if at all.
"At this stage, you're seeing all the wrong elements for recovery," Gregory Daco, chief United States economist at analyst firm Oxford Economics, told the New York Times. "A deteriorating health situation, a weakening labor market, and a softening path for demand."
In a statement, Groundwork Collaborative executive director Michael Linden noted the economic damage that ending the benefit would cause and called on Congress to act quickly to extend the payments.
"Not only would it be morally reprehensible for President Trump and his conservative allies to cut the income of 30 million families during a pandemic, it would also be devastating for an economy that is already severely damaged and heading in the wrong direction," said Linden.
"Congress must move quickly to do the right thing for families and the economy and extend these expanded benefits until this crisis is finally truly over," he added.
As U.S. lawmakers debate the details of extending or cutting federal unemployment benefits that have helped Americans weather the Covid-19 pandemic, jobless numbers rose for the first time in three months last week as millions remain out of work.
"Congress needs to act immediately," Economic Policy Institute (EPI) director of policy Heidi Shierholz wrote Thursday of the need for an extension of the $600 unemployment benefit. "If they let the extra payments expire and then reinstate them, it will be a needless administrative nightmare for state agencies, and recipients--who will face a lapse in benefits several weeks in most states--will pay the price."
Thursday's unemployment numbers hit 2.3 million, Shierholz wrote, once you combine the 1.4 million regular unemployment claims with the number of claimants for the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance (PUA) program passed as part of the CARES Act economic stimulus.
The economic crisis is nowhere near over, she added, and without swift action from lawmakers on benefit extensions things could get far worse.
"A disaster of Congress' making is looming for those who have lost their livelihoods during the global pandemic," wrote Shierholz.
As Common Dreams reported, GOP leaders have suggested replacing the $600 weekly benefit with a $100 weekly payment, a move that EPI researcher Josh Bivens called "both cruel and stupid."
In a statement, Andrew Stettner, senior fellow at The Century Foundation, said that in light of Thursday's numbers, "not extending the weekly $600 benefit supplement would be unconscionable."
"When Congress put into place the CARES Act benefits, 8.2 million workers were collecting unemployment. Taking into account the 13 million claims for PUA (which will continue through December 31), there are a total of 33.8 million workers filing for unemployment this week," Stettner said. "Given these realities, it's preposterous that Senate leaders are floating a $100 weekly supplement at a time when there is no end in sight to economic distress."
Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin on Thursday told CNBC that the administration and Senate Republicans were close to a deal that would keep the benefit at what the Washington Post estimated would be around $200 with a 70% wage replacement.
"We're not going to continue in its current form because we're not going to pay people more money to stay at home than work," the secretary said. "We want to make sure that the people out there who can't find jobs do get a reasonable wage replacement--so it will be based on approximately 70 percent wage replacement."
House Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) followed Mnuchin on the network and said that ending the benefit was not "the policy we ought to pursue," adding that any drop in the unemployment help should be done "over time" if at all.
"At this stage, you're seeing all the wrong elements for recovery," Gregory Daco, chief United States economist at analyst firm Oxford Economics, told the New York Times. "A deteriorating health situation, a weakening labor market, and a softening path for demand."
In a statement, Groundwork Collaborative executive director Michael Linden noted the economic damage that ending the benefit would cause and called on Congress to act quickly to extend the payments.
"Not only would it be morally reprehensible for President Trump and his conservative allies to cut the income of 30 million families during a pandemic, it would also be devastating for an economy that is already severely damaged and heading in the wrong direction," said Linden.
"Congress must move quickly to do the right thing for families and the economy and extend these expanded benefits until this crisis is finally truly over," he added.