SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Former Bush administration lawyer John Yoo is making the case that President Doanld Trump can act outside of the law. (Photo: Diego Radzinschi/ALM)
'Moral and Intellectual Bankruptcy': Trump Seizes on Bush-Era Torture Memo Author John Yoo's Call for Extralegal Executive Authority
"There is a lot of continuity between the Bush and Trump administration, including an almost limitless view of executive power."
Jul 20, 2020
Progressives are raising alarm after news Sunday that President Donald Trump is reportedly looking to move forward with a series of extralegal maneuvers to further his agenda by bypassing Congress with use of a legal argument from John Yoo, the lawyer notorious for- helping craft the justification of torture in the George W. Bush administration.
"The fun part is that Yoo frames this as 'making it easy for presidents to break the law,'" tweeted journalist David Dayen "and Trump jumps on it and says 'yes let's do that.'"
According to Axios, which broke the news of the new White House strategy Sunday evening, the president is relying on a legal argument in an article Yoo wrote in June for the National Review after the Supreme Court's Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California ruling.
The court upheld former President Barack Obama's 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which Trump had attempted to repeal without setting up a new regulatory framework to replace it. Therefore, Yoo argued, the court ruled that the White House can use its own discretion on enforcing the law to effectively set policy.
As Yoo wrote:
Suppose President Donald Trump decided to create a nationwide right to carry guns openly. He could declare that he would not enforce federal firearms laws, and that a new "Trump permit" would free any holder of state and local gun-control restrictions.
Even if Trump knew that his scheme lacked legal authority, he could get away with it for the length of his presidency. And, moreover, even if courts declared the permit illegal, his successor would have to keep enforcing the program for another year or two.
While Axios editor Sam Baker noted that the interpretation was "a somewhat strained reading of both procedural history and the law," the White House appears to be taking it seriously. The president has referred to the Yoo article in conversations with administration officials, according to Axios, and hinted in an interview Sunday with Fox News' Christopher Wallace that executive action on healthcare and immigration is coming soon.
"The Supreme Court gave the president of the United States powers that nobody thought the president had, by approving, by doing what they did--their decision on DACA," said Trump, adding that in his view, "the decision by the Supreme Court on DACA allows me to do things on immigration, on health care, on other things that we've never done before."
Critics noted the reappearance of Yoo in making the case for expanded presidential powers and expressed regret that Obama, upon taking office in 2009, did not take action to hold the Bush administration accountable for its crimes.
"The reappearance of disgracefully still-employable torture advocate John Yoo is a good reminder that this time people need to be prosecuted," tweeted Matt Duss, foreign policy advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
The involvement of Yoo in the president's latest scheme to avoid Congress, Georgetown professor Don Moynihan said on Twitter, is a reminder that the current president is not so out of step with his Republican predecessor.
"The centrality of John Yoo, and his message that SCOTUS 'makes it easy for presidents to violate the law,' reminds us that there is a lot of continuity between the Bush and Trump administration, including an almost limitless view of executive power," said Moynihan.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Progressives are raising alarm after news Sunday that President Donald Trump is reportedly looking to move forward with a series of extralegal maneuvers to further his agenda by bypassing Congress with use of a legal argument from John Yoo, the lawyer notorious for- helping craft the justification of torture in the George W. Bush administration.
"The fun part is that Yoo frames this as 'making it easy for presidents to break the law,'" tweeted journalist David Dayen "and Trump jumps on it and says 'yes let's do that.'"
According to Axios, which broke the news of the new White House strategy Sunday evening, the president is relying on a legal argument in an article Yoo wrote in June for the National Review after the Supreme Court's Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California ruling.
The court upheld former President Barack Obama's 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which Trump had attempted to repeal without setting up a new regulatory framework to replace it. Therefore, Yoo argued, the court ruled that the White House can use its own discretion on enforcing the law to effectively set policy.
As Yoo wrote:
Suppose President Donald Trump decided to create a nationwide right to carry guns openly. He could declare that he would not enforce federal firearms laws, and that a new "Trump permit" would free any holder of state and local gun-control restrictions.
Even if Trump knew that his scheme lacked legal authority, he could get away with it for the length of his presidency. And, moreover, even if courts declared the permit illegal, his successor would have to keep enforcing the program for another year or two.
While Axios editor Sam Baker noted that the interpretation was "a somewhat strained reading of both procedural history and the law," the White House appears to be taking it seriously. The president has referred to the Yoo article in conversations with administration officials, according to Axios, and hinted in an interview Sunday with Fox News' Christopher Wallace that executive action on healthcare and immigration is coming soon.
"The Supreme Court gave the president of the United States powers that nobody thought the president had, by approving, by doing what they did--their decision on DACA," said Trump, adding that in his view, "the decision by the Supreme Court on DACA allows me to do things on immigration, on health care, on other things that we've never done before."
Critics noted the reappearance of Yoo in making the case for expanded presidential powers and expressed regret that Obama, upon taking office in 2009, did not take action to hold the Bush administration accountable for its crimes.
"The reappearance of disgracefully still-employable torture advocate John Yoo is a good reminder that this time people need to be prosecuted," tweeted Matt Duss, foreign policy advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
The involvement of Yoo in the president's latest scheme to avoid Congress, Georgetown professor Don Moynihan said on Twitter, is a reminder that the current president is not so out of step with his Republican predecessor.
"The centrality of John Yoo, and his message that SCOTUS 'makes it easy for presidents to violate the law,' reminds us that there is a lot of continuity between the Bush and Trump administration, including an almost limitless view of executive power," said Moynihan.
Progressives are raising alarm after news Sunday that President Donald Trump is reportedly looking to move forward with a series of extralegal maneuvers to further his agenda by bypassing Congress with use of a legal argument from John Yoo, the lawyer notorious for- helping craft the justification of torture in the George W. Bush administration.
"The fun part is that Yoo frames this as 'making it easy for presidents to break the law,'" tweeted journalist David Dayen "and Trump jumps on it and says 'yes let's do that.'"
According to Axios, which broke the news of the new White House strategy Sunday evening, the president is relying on a legal argument in an article Yoo wrote in June for the National Review after the Supreme Court's Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California ruling.
The court upheld former President Barack Obama's 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which Trump had attempted to repeal without setting up a new regulatory framework to replace it. Therefore, Yoo argued, the court ruled that the White House can use its own discretion on enforcing the law to effectively set policy.
As Yoo wrote:
Suppose President Donald Trump decided to create a nationwide right to carry guns openly. He could declare that he would not enforce federal firearms laws, and that a new "Trump permit" would free any holder of state and local gun-control restrictions.
Even if Trump knew that his scheme lacked legal authority, he could get away with it for the length of his presidency. And, moreover, even if courts declared the permit illegal, his successor would have to keep enforcing the program for another year or two.
While Axios editor Sam Baker noted that the interpretation was "a somewhat strained reading of both procedural history and the law," the White House appears to be taking it seriously. The president has referred to the Yoo article in conversations with administration officials, according to Axios, and hinted in an interview Sunday with Fox News' Christopher Wallace that executive action on healthcare and immigration is coming soon.
"The Supreme Court gave the president of the United States powers that nobody thought the president had, by approving, by doing what they did--their decision on DACA," said Trump, adding that in his view, "the decision by the Supreme Court on DACA allows me to do things on immigration, on health care, on other things that we've never done before."
Critics noted the reappearance of Yoo in making the case for expanded presidential powers and expressed regret that Obama, upon taking office in 2009, did not take action to hold the Bush administration accountable for its crimes.
"The reappearance of disgracefully still-employable torture advocate John Yoo is a good reminder that this time people need to be prosecuted," tweeted Matt Duss, foreign policy advisor to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
The involvement of Yoo in the president's latest scheme to avoid Congress, Georgetown professor Don Moynihan said on Twitter, is a reminder that the current president is not so out of step with his Republican predecessor.
"The centrality of John Yoo, and his message that SCOTUS 'makes it easy for presidents to violate the law,' reminds us that there is a lot of continuity between the Bush and Trump administration, including an almost limitless view of executive power," said Moynihan.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.