

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) speaks during an oversight hearing in the Rayburn House Office Building on Capitol Hill February 8, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
The Congressional Progressive Caucus said Sunday that it will formally oppose the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2021 unless "significant action" is taken to reduce the bill's proposed Pentagon outlay.
"Rubber-stamping a record $740 billion for the Pentagon shortchanges millions of families trying to get by in this crisis," tweeted the CPC, which has more than 90 members. "Enhanced unemployment benefits expire in less than two weeks. The federal eviction moratorium expires in six days."
"Congress should be focused on addressing these urgent crises," the CPC added, "not passing a wasteful, bloated $740 billion defense bill to line the pockets of defense contractors."
Along with Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), CPC co-chairs Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) are advocating the passage of an NDAA amendment that would cut the proposed Pentagon budget by 10%--$74 billion--and redirect the savings toward healthcare, housing, and education in poor communities.
"This 10% cut is eminently doable and reasonable," Jayapal said during an event late last month. "But it's not going to be easy... As progressives, it is our job to redefine and reimagine what it is to be strong. Strong means an end to endless wars and a return to robust diplomacy and international coalition building."
Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) are co-sponsoring a companion amendment in the Senate. In a speech on the Senate floor last month, Sanders described the proposed 10% cut as a "modest" way to begin shifting U.S. spending priorities away from endless war and toward urgent domestic concerns.
With the amendment expected to receive a vote this coming week, Sanders wrote in an email to supporters Sunday that "the time is now to cut military spending and use that money for human needs."
"How can it be that we have enough to spend more on defense than the next eleven countries combined, but we don't have enough to make sure every American child has a roof over their head and enough food to eat?" Sanders wrote. "A great nation is not judged by the size of its military budget, it is judged by how well it treats its weakest and most vulnerable citizens."
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
The Congressional Progressive Caucus said Sunday that it will formally oppose the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2021 unless "significant action" is taken to reduce the bill's proposed Pentagon outlay.
"Rubber-stamping a record $740 billion for the Pentagon shortchanges millions of families trying to get by in this crisis," tweeted the CPC, which has more than 90 members. "Enhanced unemployment benefits expire in less than two weeks. The federal eviction moratorium expires in six days."
"Congress should be focused on addressing these urgent crises," the CPC added, "not passing a wasteful, bloated $740 billion defense bill to line the pockets of defense contractors."
Along with Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), CPC co-chairs Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) are advocating the passage of an NDAA amendment that would cut the proposed Pentagon budget by 10%--$74 billion--and redirect the savings toward healthcare, housing, and education in poor communities.
"This 10% cut is eminently doable and reasonable," Jayapal said during an event late last month. "But it's not going to be easy... As progressives, it is our job to redefine and reimagine what it is to be strong. Strong means an end to endless wars and a return to robust diplomacy and international coalition building."
Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) are co-sponsoring a companion amendment in the Senate. In a speech on the Senate floor last month, Sanders described the proposed 10% cut as a "modest" way to begin shifting U.S. spending priorities away from endless war and toward urgent domestic concerns.
With the amendment expected to receive a vote this coming week, Sanders wrote in an email to supporters Sunday that "the time is now to cut military spending and use that money for human needs."
"How can it be that we have enough to spend more on defense than the next eleven countries combined, but we don't have enough to make sure every American child has a roof over their head and enough food to eat?" Sanders wrote. "A great nation is not judged by the size of its military budget, it is judged by how well it treats its weakest and most vulnerable citizens."
The Congressional Progressive Caucus said Sunday that it will formally oppose the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2021 unless "significant action" is taken to reduce the bill's proposed Pentagon outlay.
"Rubber-stamping a record $740 billion for the Pentagon shortchanges millions of families trying to get by in this crisis," tweeted the CPC, which has more than 90 members. "Enhanced unemployment benefits expire in less than two weeks. The federal eviction moratorium expires in six days."
"Congress should be focused on addressing these urgent crises," the CPC added, "not passing a wasteful, bloated $740 billion defense bill to line the pockets of defense contractors."
Along with Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), CPC co-chairs Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) and Mark Pocan (D-Wis.) are advocating the passage of an NDAA amendment that would cut the proposed Pentagon budget by 10%--$74 billion--and redirect the savings toward healthcare, housing, and education in poor communities.
"This 10% cut is eminently doable and reasonable," Jayapal said during an event late last month. "But it's not going to be easy... As progressives, it is our job to redefine and reimagine what it is to be strong. Strong means an end to endless wars and a return to robust diplomacy and international coalition building."
Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) are co-sponsoring a companion amendment in the Senate. In a speech on the Senate floor last month, Sanders described the proposed 10% cut as a "modest" way to begin shifting U.S. spending priorities away from endless war and toward urgent domestic concerns.
With the amendment expected to receive a vote this coming week, Sanders wrote in an email to supporters Sunday that "the time is now to cut military spending and use that money for human needs."
"How can it be that we have enough to spend more on defense than the next eleven countries combined, but we don't have enough to make sure every American child has a roof over their head and enough food to eat?" Sanders wrote. "A great nation is not judged by the size of its military budget, it is judged by how well it treats its weakest and most vulnerable citizens."