SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Kentucky state Rep. Charles Booker speaks at a campaign rally. (Photo: Booker for Kentucky)
Potential Political 'Earthquake' Brewing as Booker Takes Lead Over McGrath in Kentucky
"What's going on in Kentucky, you ask? Something big."
Jun 25, 2020
Progressive state Rep. Charles Booker on Thursday overtook centrist Amy McGrath for the first time in the vote count of Tuesday's primary, raising hopes of a potential upset in the race to face Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in November.
On Thursday morning, with more than 74,000 votes counted and 79% of the state's precincts reporting their in-person, Election Day numbers, officials reported Booker had 43.5% of the vote versus 40% for McGrath.
Since the election, McGrath had previously consistently held more votes than Booker, and was about 4,000 votes ahead of him as of Wednesday.
Results in Jefferson County, where Booker's hometown of Louisville lies, were reported on Thursday just before he took the lead, and Courier-Journal reporter Joe Sonka noted that more than 160,000 absentee ballots have yet to be counted there. Absentee ballot results likely won't be known until June 30.
As Intercept journalist Ryan Grim pointed out, Booker has won 80% of the in-person vote in Jefferson County so far, signaling that many of the incoming absentee votes are likely for him as well.
"McGrath will have to hunt extremely hard to find the votes to make that up elsewhere," Grim tweeted.
Sonka cautioned on social media that hundreds of thousands of votes have yet to be counted across Kentucky and that Booker's victory is far from definite.
But Booker expressed confidence as the results were reported that the Democratic Party, which has supported McGrath and was a driving force behind her fundraising success, could soon be stunned by the election result.
Anand Giridharadas tweeted that a victory by Booker would represent an electoral "earthquake" in Kentucky.
Booker ran on a platform prioritizing Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, and universal basic income, and talked extensively throughout the campaign about growing up in poverty in Louisville and his past struggles to afford insulin for his diabetes. In Booker's introductory campaign video, he vilified McConnell for being disconnected from and dismissive of Kentucky voters during the incumbent's three decades in office while pushing legislation that prioritizes corporate profits and the wealthy.
Booker was endorsed by progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and by Kentucky's two largest newspapers and members of the state's Democratic establishment including former Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.
In its endorsement of Booker, the Courier-Journal editorial board wrote, "It's time to shake up the establishment" and criticized McGrath for being "overly moderate," "unimaginative, and uninspiring."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Progressive state Rep. Charles Booker on Thursday overtook centrist Amy McGrath for the first time in the vote count of Tuesday's primary, raising hopes of a potential upset in the race to face Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in November.
On Thursday morning, with more than 74,000 votes counted and 79% of the state's precincts reporting their in-person, Election Day numbers, officials reported Booker had 43.5% of the vote versus 40% for McGrath.
Since the election, McGrath had previously consistently held more votes than Booker, and was about 4,000 votes ahead of him as of Wednesday.
Results in Jefferson County, where Booker's hometown of Louisville lies, were reported on Thursday just before he took the lead, and Courier-Journal reporter Joe Sonka noted that more than 160,000 absentee ballots have yet to be counted there. Absentee ballot results likely won't be known until June 30.
As Intercept journalist Ryan Grim pointed out, Booker has won 80% of the in-person vote in Jefferson County so far, signaling that many of the incoming absentee votes are likely for him as well.
"McGrath will have to hunt extremely hard to find the votes to make that up elsewhere," Grim tweeted.
Sonka cautioned on social media that hundreds of thousands of votes have yet to be counted across Kentucky and that Booker's victory is far from definite.
But Booker expressed confidence as the results were reported that the Democratic Party, which has supported McGrath and was a driving force behind her fundraising success, could soon be stunned by the election result.
Anand Giridharadas tweeted that a victory by Booker would represent an electoral "earthquake" in Kentucky.
Booker ran on a platform prioritizing Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, and universal basic income, and talked extensively throughout the campaign about growing up in poverty in Louisville and his past struggles to afford insulin for his diabetes. In Booker's introductory campaign video, he vilified McConnell for being disconnected from and dismissive of Kentucky voters during the incumbent's three decades in office while pushing legislation that prioritizes corporate profits and the wealthy.
Booker was endorsed by progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and by Kentucky's two largest newspapers and members of the state's Democratic establishment including former Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.
In its endorsement of Booker, the Courier-Journal editorial board wrote, "It's time to shake up the establishment" and criticized McGrath for being "overly moderate," "unimaginative, and uninspiring."
Progressive state Rep. Charles Booker on Thursday overtook centrist Amy McGrath for the first time in the vote count of Tuesday's primary, raising hopes of a potential upset in the race to face Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in November.
On Thursday morning, with more than 74,000 votes counted and 79% of the state's precincts reporting their in-person, Election Day numbers, officials reported Booker had 43.5% of the vote versus 40% for McGrath.
Since the election, McGrath had previously consistently held more votes than Booker, and was about 4,000 votes ahead of him as of Wednesday.
Results in Jefferson County, where Booker's hometown of Louisville lies, were reported on Thursday just before he took the lead, and Courier-Journal reporter Joe Sonka noted that more than 160,000 absentee ballots have yet to be counted there. Absentee ballot results likely won't be known until June 30.
As Intercept journalist Ryan Grim pointed out, Booker has won 80% of the in-person vote in Jefferson County so far, signaling that many of the incoming absentee votes are likely for him as well.
"McGrath will have to hunt extremely hard to find the votes to make that up elsewhere," Grim tweeted.
Sonka cautioned on social media that hundreds of thousands of votes have yet to be counted across Kentucky and that Booker's victory is far from definite.
But Booker expressed confidence as the results were reported that the Democratic Party, which has supported McGrath and was a driving force behind her fundraising success, could soon be stunned by the election result.
Anand Giridharadas tweeted that a victory by Booker would represent an electoral "earthquake" in Kentucky.
Booker ran on a platform prioritizing Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, and universal basic income, and talked extensively throughout the campaign about growing up in poverty in Louisville and his past struggles to afford insulin for his diabetes. In Booker's introductory campaign video, he vilified McConnell for being disconnected from and dismissive of Kentucky voters during the incumbent's three decades in office while pushing legislation that prioritizes corporate profits and the wealthy.
Booker was endorsed by progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and by Kentucky's two largest newspapers and members of the state's Democratic establishment including former Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.
In its endorsement of Booker, the Courier-Journal editorial board wrote, "It's time to shake up the establishment" and criticized McGrath for being "overly moderate," "unimaginative, and uninspiring."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy