New York City nurses and other hospital professionals protest dangerous working conditions and a change in sick leave policies during the Covid-19 pandemic on April 17, 2020. (Photo: Andrew Lichtenstein/Corbis via Getty Images)
May 21, 2020
A progressive organization of 23,000 physicians from across the U.S. demanded Thursday that the American Hospital Association (AHA) divest completely from a dark-money lobbying group that has spent millions combating Medicare for All and instead devote those financial resources to the fight against Covid-19 and to better support for patients and healthcare workers.
Dr. Adam Gaffney, president of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), said in a statement that "the Covid-19 pandemic has stretched hospitals' resources to the limit, and the AHA should not waste precious member hospitals' funds lobbying against universal health coverage" as a member of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future (PFAHCF).
Because Medicare for All would provide a lifeline to hospitals in underserved areas that have been hit hard by Covid-19, Gaffney argued, the AHA "cannot claim to represent hospitals while also opposing a single-payer system that would keep struggling hospitals open." The AHA represents around 5,000 hospitals and other healthcare providers in the U.S.
"The AHA should not waste precious member hospitals' funds lobbying against universal health coverage."
--Dr. Adam Gaffney, Physicians for a National Health Program
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, public health officials are accusing the Trump administration of directing billions of dollars in Covid-19 hospital bailout funds to high-revenue providers while restricting money to hospitals that serve low-income areas.
Tenet Healthcare, an investor-owned hospital company that has donated hundreds of thousands to PFAHCF, has received $345 million in Covid-19 bailout funds, Axiosreported last month.
"The AHA should immediately leave the PFAHCF," Gaffney said, "and redirect that money to supporting patients and frontline healthcare workers."
"As physicians, we can no longer tolerate a health system that puts profits ahead of patients and public health," Gaffney added. "It's time for health professionals to hold accountable the organizations that claim to represent us."
Formed in the summer of 2018 by an alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and hospital lobbyists with the goal of countering the push for universal healthcare, PFAHCF's anti-Medicare for All "army" has grown rapidly since its founding, with the AHA joining the fray in 2019.
As The Interceptreported last October, the for-profit hospital industry has played an "integral role" in the corporate fight against single-payer.
"America's hospitals and health systems strongly support improving patient access to health coverage for all Americans," Rick Pollack, AHA's president and CEO, wrote in a blog post last February. "That's why we've joined with the American Medical Association and others as part of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future to build on the strength of the existing reforms."
The American Medical Association dropped out of PFAHCF last year in the face of protests from doctors and nurses, and now healthcare workers are pressuring AHA to do the same.
PNHP said it originally planned to protest outside of the AHA's annual meeting in Washington, D.C. in April but has been forced by the coronavirus pandemic to take its pressure campaign online, "with tactics such as a petition and letter-writing campaign directed at AHA officials."
Rev. Richard Ellerbrake, president emeritus of Deaconess Health System in St. Louis, Missouri, wrote in a letter to AHA board members that "it often seemed to me that the AHA was ahead of the American Medical Association (AMA) on many important issues of the day."
"Today I would hope the AHA would follow the example of the AMA and discontinue supporting the PFAHCF," wrote Ellerbrake.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
coronavirushealthcaremedicare for allpandemicphysicians for a national health program (pnhp)single-payer
A progressive organization of 23,000 physicians from across the U.S. demanded Thursday that the American Hospital Association (AHA) divest completely from a dark-money lobbying group that has spent millions combating Medicare for All and instead devote those financial resources to the fight against Covid-19 and to better support for patients and healthcare workers.
Dr. Adam Gaffney, president of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), said in a statement that "the Covid-19 pandemic has stretched hospitals' resources to the limit, and the AHA should not waste precious member hospitals' funds lobbying against universal health coverage" as a member of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future (PFAHCF).
Because Medicare for All would provide a lifeline to hospitals in underserved areas that have been hit hard by Covid-19, Gaffney argued, the AHA "cannot claim to represent hospitals while also opposing a single-payer system that would keep struggling hospitals open." The AHA represents around 5,000 hospitals and other healthcare providers in the U.S.
"The AHA should not waste precious member hospitals' funds lobbying against universal health coverage."
--Dr. Adam Gaffney, Physicians for a National Health Program
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, public health officials are accusing the Trump administration of directing billions of dollars in Covid-19 hospital bailout funds to high-revenue providers while restricting money to hospitals that serve low-income areas.
Tenet Healthcare, an investor-owned hospital company that has donated hundreds of thousands to PFAHCF, has received $345 million in Covid-19 bailout funds, Axiosreported last month.
"The AHA should immediately leave the PFAHCF," Gaffney said, "and redirect that money to supporting patients and frontline healthcare workers."
"As physicians, we can no longer tolerate a health system that puts profits ahead of patients and public health," Gaffney added. "It's time for health professionals to hold accountable the organizations that claim to represent us."
Formed in the summer of 2018 by an alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and hospital lobbyists with the goal of countering the push for universal healthcare, PFAHCF's anti-Medicare for All "army" has grown rapidly since its founding, with the AHA joining the fray in 2019.
As The Interceptreported last October, the for-profit hospital industry has played an "integral role" in the corporate fight against single-payer.
"America's hospitals and health systems strongly support improving patient access to health coverage for all Americans," Rick Pollack, AHA's president and CEO, wrote in a blog post last February. "That's why we've joined with the American Medical Association and others as part of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future to build on the strength of the existing reforms."
The American Medical Association dropped out of PFAHCF last year in the face of protests from doctors and nurses, and now healthcare workers are pressuring AHA to do the same.
PNHP said it originally planned to protest outside of the AHA's annual meeting in Washington, D.C. in April but has been forced by the coronavirus pandemic to take its pressure campaign online, "with tactics such as a petition and letter-writing campaign directed at AHA officials."
Rev. Richard Ellerbrake, president emeritus of Deaconess Health System in St. Louis, Missouri, wrote in a letter to AHA board members that "it often seemed to me that the AHA was ahead of the American Medical Association (AMA) on many important issues of the day."
"Today I would hope the AHA would follow the example of the AMA and discontinue supporting the PFAHCF," wrote Ellerbrake.
A progressive organization of 23,000 physicians from across the U.S. demanded Thursday that the American Hospital Association (AHA) divest completely from a dark-money lobbying group that has spent millions combating Medicare for All and instead devote those financial resources to the fight against Covid-19 and to better support for patients and healthcare workers.
Dr. Adam Gaffney, president of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), said in a statement that "the Covid-19 pandemic has stretched hospitals' resources to the limit, and the AHA should not waste precious member hospitals' funds lobbying against universal health coverage" as a member of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future (PFAHCF).
Because Medicare for All would provide a lifeline to hospitals in underserved areas that have been hit hard by Covid-19, Gaffney argued, the AHA "cannot claim to represent hospitals while also opposing a single-payer system that would keep struggling hospitals open." The AHA represents around 5,000 hospitals and other healthcare providers in the U.S.
"The AHA should not waste precious member hospitals' funds lobbying against universal health coverage."
--Dr. Adam Gaffney, Physicians for a National Health Program
As Common Dreams reported earlier this month, public health officials are accusing the Trump administration of directing billions of dollars in Covid-19 hospital bailout funds to high-revenue providers while restricting money to hospitals that serve low-income areas.
Tenet Healthcare, an investor-owned hospital company that has donated hundreds of thousands to PFAHCF, has received $345 million in Covid-19 bailout funds, Axiosreported last month.
"The AHA should immediately leave the PFAHCF," Gaffney said, "and redirect that money to supporting patients and frontline healthcare workers."
"As physicians, we can no longer tolerate a health system that puts profits ahead of patients and public health," Gaffney added. "It's time for health professionals to hold accountable the organizations that claim to represent us."
Formed in the summer of 2018 by an alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and hospital lobbyists with the goal of countering the push for universal healthcare, PFAHCF's anti-Medicare for All "army" has grown rapidly since its founding, with the AHA joining the fray in 2019.
As The Interceptreported last October, the for-profit hospital industry has played an "integral role" in the corporate fight against single-payer.
"America's hospitals and health systems strongly support improving patient access to health coverage for all Americans," Rick Pollack, AHA's president and CEO, wrote in a blog post last February. "That's why we've joined with the American Medical Association and others as part of the Partnership for America's Health Care Future to build on the strength of the existing reforms."
The American Medical Association dropped out of PFAHCF last year in the face of protests from doctors and nurses, and now healthcare workers are pressuring AHA to do the same.
PNHP said it originally planned to protest outside of the AHA's annual meeting in Washington, D.C. in April but has been forced by the coronavirus pandemic to take its pressure campaign online, "with tactics such as a petition and letter-writing campaign directed at AHA officials."
Rev. Richard Ellerbrake, president emeritus of Deaconess Health System in St. Louis, Missouri, wrote in a letter to AHA board members that "it often seemed to me that the AHA was ahead of the American Medical Association (AMA) on many important issues of the day."
"Today I would hope the AHA would follow the example of the AMA and discontinue supporting the PFAHCF," wrote Ellerbrake.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.