A progressive organization of 23,000 physicians from across the U.S. demanded Thursday that the American Hospital Association (AHA) divest completely from a dark-money lobbying group that has spent millions combating Medicare for All and instead devote those financial resources to the fight against Covid-19 and to better support for patients and healthcare workers.Dr. Adam Gaffney, president of Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), said in a statement that \u0022the Covid-19 pandemic has stretched hospitals\u0026#039; resources to the limit, and the AHA should not waste precious member hospitals\u0026#039; funds lobbying against universal health coverage\u0022 as a member of the Partnership for America\u0026#039;s Health Care Future (PFAHCF).Because Medicare for All would provide a lifeline to hospitals in underserved areas that have been hit hard by Covid-19, Gaffney argued, the AHA \u0022cannot claim to represent hospitals while also opposing a single-payer system that would keep struggling hospitals open.\u0022 The AHA represents around 5,000 hospitals and other healthcare providers in the U.S.\u0022The AHA should not waste precious member hospitals\u0026#039; funds lobbying against universal health coverage.\u0022 —Dr. Adam Gaffney, Physicians for a National Health ProgramAs Common Dreams reported earlier this month, public health officials are accusing the Trump administration of directing billions of dollars in Covid-19 hospital bailout funds to high-revenue providers while restricting money to hospitals that serve low-income areas.Tenet Healthcare, an investor-owned hospital company that has donated hundreds of thousands to PFAHCF, has received $345 million in Covid-19 bailout funds, Axios reported last month.\u0022The AHA should immediately leave the PFAHCF,\u0022 Gaffney said, \u0022and redirect that money to supporting patients and frontline healthcare workers.\u0022\u0022As physicians, we can no longer tolerate a health system that puts profits ahead of patients and public health,\u0022 Gaffney added. \u0022It\u0026#039;s time for health professionals to hold accountable the organizations that claim to represent us.\u0022Formed in the summer of 2018 by an alliance of pharmaceutical, insurance, and hospital lobbyists with the goal of countering the push for universal healthcare, PFAHCF\u0026#039;s anti-Medicare for All \u0022army\u0022 has grown rapidly since its founding, with the AHA joining the fray in 2019.As\u0026nbsp;The Intercept reported last October, the for-profit hospital industry has played an \u0022integral role\u0022 in the corporate fight against single-payer.\u0022America\u0026#039;s hospitals and health systems strongly support improving patient access to health coverage for all Americans,\u0022 Rick Pollack, AHA\u0026#039;s president and CEO, wrote in a blog post last February. \u0022That\u0026#039;s why we\u0026#039;ve joined with the American Medical Association and others as part of the Partnership for America\u0026#039;s Health Care Future to build on the strength of the existing reforms.\u0022The American Medical Association dropped out of PFAHCF last year in the face of protests from doctors and nurses, and now healthcare workers are pressuring AHA to do the same.PNHP said it originally planned to protest outside of the AHA\u0026#039;s annual meeting in Washington, D.C. in April but has been forced by the coronavirus pandemic to take its pressure campaign online, \u0022with tactics such as a petition and letter-writing campaign directed at AHA officials.\u0022Rev. Richard Ellerbrake, president emeritus of Deaconess Health System in St. Louis, Missouri, wrote in a letter to AHA board members that \u0022it often seemed to me that the AHA was ahead of the American Medical Association (AMA) on many important issues of the day.\u0022\u0022Today I would hope the AHA would follow the example of the AMA and discontinue supporting the PFAHCF,\u0022 wrote Ellerbrake.