A view of the Grand Canyon on Sept. 9, 2014. (NPS photo of Grand Canyon National Park by M. Quinn via flickr)
Instead of Protecting Public Health During Covid-19 Crisis, Trump Moves to Prop Up 'Dirty, Dying' Uranium Mining Industry
"It's despicable to risk irreversible harm to spectacular wild places by propping up uranium companies that can't compete in global markets."
The Trump administration was accused on Thursday of moving to unleash "irreversible harm" on the country's environment after releasing a proposal for how to boost "the entire U.S. nuclear enterprise" including by reviving domestic uranium mining.
"Rather than try to protect people and their health, the Trump administration is jumping in with plans to prop up this dirty, dying industry," said Geoff Fettus, a senior attorney for Natural Resources Defense Council.
The proposal is laid out in a document released Thursday entitled "Restoring America's Competitive Nuclear Energy Advantage." The long-awaited recommendations come from the national Nuclear Fuel Working Group, a panel President Donald Trump established last year.
Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette, in a statement announcing the strategy, claimed it was "a matter of national security" to "take bold steps to preserve and grow the entire U.S. nuclear energy enterprise."
The strategy calls for the U.S. government to:
- "Take bold action to revive and strengthen the uranium mining industry, support uranium conversion services, end reliance on foreign uranium enrichment capabilities, and sustain the current fleet, removing strategic vulnerabilities across the nuclear fuel cycle and restoring a world-class workforce to provide benefits to the U.S. and to compete in the international market."
- "Leverage American technological innovation and advanced nuclear Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D) investments to accelerate technical advances and regain American nuclear energy leadership"; and
- "Move into markets currently dominated by Russian andChinese State Owned Enterprises (SOE) and recover our position as the world leader in exporting best-in-class nuclear energy technology, and with it, strong non-proliferation standards."
Reuters reported that the strategy would also allow "the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to deny imports of certain uranium supplies from Russia and China for national security purposes."
The document also suggested an attack on a federal environmental law could be needed to boost uranium mining:
Throughout the regulatory process, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis is required, in addition to other environmental or land preservation analyses. These procedures and processes can take years to successfully navigate, which equates to higher project risk and higher permitting and licensing costs. Efforts to streamline governmental and regulatory processes have the potential to increase the competitiveness of all new uranium production facilities.
The Center for Biological Diversity joined NRDC in criticizing the plan, expressing particular concern over how domestic uranium mining could "industrialize public lands" and wreak ecological havoc.
"These dangerous recommendations invite more deadly uranium pollution in rural communities and places like Grand Canyon National Park," said Taylor McKinnon, a campaigner with the conservation group.
"Every federal dollar wasted on this effort is a dollar stolen from cleaning up the industry's toxic pollution legacy in the Navajo Nation and across the West," he continued. "It's despicable to risk irreversible harm to spectacular wild places by propping up uranium companies that can't compete in global markets."
Other public lands could be at risk as well, said The Wilderness Society.
"Enriching special interests with taxpayer resources so they can plunder national treasures like Bears Ears and the Grand Canyon will harm our land, water, and public health," said America Fitzpatrick, senior representative of The Wilderness Society. "To do so in the face of a global pandemic is an abuse of public trust."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Trump administration was accused on Thursday of moving to unleash "irreversible harm" on the country's environment after releasing a proposal for how to boost "the entire U.S. nuclear enterprise" including by reviving domestic uranium mining.
"Rather than try to protect people and their health, the Trump administration is jumping in with plans to prop up this dirty, dying industry," said Geoff Fettus, a senior attorney for Natural Resources Defense Council.
The proposal is laid out in a document released Thursday entitled "Restoring America's Competitive Nuclear Energy Advantage." The long-awaited recommendations come from the national Nuclear Fuel Working Group, a panel President Donald Trump established last year.
Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette, in a statement announcing the strategy, claimed it was "a matter of national security" to "take bold steps to preserve and grow the entire U.S. nuclear energy enterprise."
The strategy calls for the U.S. government to:
- "Take bold action to revive and strengthen the uranium mining industry, support uranium conversion services, end reliance on foreign uranium enrichment capabilities, and sustain the current fleet, removing strategic vulnerabilities across the nuclear fuel cycle and restoring a world-class workforce to provide benefits to the U.S. and to compete in the international market."
- "Leverage American technological innovation and advanced nuclear Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D) investments to accelerate technical advances and regain American nuclear energy leadership"; and
- "Move into markets currently dominated by Russian andChinese State Owned Enterprises (SOE) and recover our position as the world leader in exporting best-in-class nuclear energy technology, and with it, strong non-proliferation standards."
Reuters reported that the strategy would also allow "the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to deny imports of certain uranium supplies from Russia and China for national security purposes."
The document also suggested an attack on a federal environmental law could be needed to boost uranium mining:
Throughout the regulatory process, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis is required, in addition to other environmental or land preservation analyses. These procedures and processes can take years to successfully navigate, which equates to higher project risk and higher permitting and licensing costs. Efforts to streamline governmental and regulatory processes have the potential to increase the competitiveness of all new uranium production facilities.
The Center for Biological Diversity joined NRDC in criticizing the plan, expressing particular concern over how domestic uranium mining could "industrialize public lands" and wreak ecological havoc.
"These dangerous recommendations invite more deadly uranium pollution in rural communities and places like Grand Canyon National Park," said Taylor McKinnon, a campaigner with the conservation group.
"Every federal dollar wasted on this effort is a dollar stolen from cleaning up the industry's toxic pollution legacy in the Navajo Nation and across the West," he continued. "It's despicable to risk irreversible harm to spectacular wild places by propping up uranium companies that can't compete in global markets."
Other public lands could be at risk as well, said The Wilderness Society.
"Enriching special interests with taxpayer resources so they can plunder national treasures like Bears Ears and the Grand Canyon will harm our land, water, and public health," said America Fitzpatrick, senior representative of The Wilderness Society. "To do so in the face of a global pandemic is an abuse of public trust."
The Trump administration was accused on Thursday of moving to unleash "irreversible harm" on the country's environment after releasing a proposal for how to boost "the entire U.S. nuclear enterprise" including by reviving domestic uranium mining.
"Rather than try to protect people and their health, the Trump administration is jumping in with plans to prop up this dirty, dying industry," said Geoff Fettus, a senior attorney for Natural Resources Defense Council.
The proposal is laid out in a document released Thursday entitled "Restoring America's Competitive Nuclear Energy Advantage." The long-awaited recommendations come from the national Nuclear Fuel Working Group, a panel President Donald Trump established last year.
Energy Secretary Dan Brouillette, in a statement announcing the strategy, claimed it was "a matter of national security" to "take bold steps to preserve and grow the entire U.S. nuclear energy enterprise."
The strategy calls for the U.S. government to:
- "Take bold action to revive and strengthen the uranium mining industry, support uranium conversion services, end reliance on foreign uranium enrichment capabilities, and sustain the current fleet, removing strategic vulnerabilities across the nuclear fuel cycle and restoring a world-class workforce to provide benefits to the U.S. and to compete in the international market."
- "Leverage American technological innovation and advanced nuclear Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D) investments to accelerate technical advances and regain American nuclear energy leadership"; and
- "Move into markets currently dominated by Russian andChinese State Owned Enterprises (SOE) and recover our position as the world leader in exporting best-in-class nuclear energy technology, and with it, strong non-proliferation standards."
Reuters reported that the strategy would also allow "the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to deny imports of certain uranium supplies from Russia and China for national security purposes."
The document also suggested an attack on a federal environmental law could be needed to boost uranium mining:
Throughout the regulatory process, National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis is required, in addition to other environmental or land preservation analyses. These procedures and processes can take years to successfully navigate, which equates to higher project risk and higher permitting and licensing costs. Efforts to streamline governmental and regulatory processes have the potential to increase the competitiveness of all new uranium production facilities.
The Center for Biological Diversity joined NRDC in criticizing the plan, expressing particular concern over how domestic uranium mining could "industrialize public lands" and wreak ecological havoc.
"These dangerous recommendations invite more deadly uranium pollution in rural communities and places like Grand Canyon National Park," said Taylor McKinnon, a campaigner with the conservation group.
"Every federal dollar wasted on this effort is a dollar stolen from cleaning up the industry's toxic pollution legacy in the Navajo Nation and across the West," he continued. "It's despicable to risk irreversible harm to spectacular wild places by propping up uranium companies that can't compete in global markets."
Other public lands could be at risk as well, said The Wilderness Society.
"Enriching special interests with taxpayer resources so they can plunder national treasures like Bears Ears and the Grand Canyon will harm our land, water, and public health," said America Fitzpatrick, senior representative of The Wilderness Society. "To do so in the face of a global pandemic is an abuse of public trust."