Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, (D-N.Y) speaks in Durham, New Hampshire on February 10, 2020. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
'Completely Dangerous and Unacceptable,' Ocasio-Cortez Says of Impending Senate Recess in Midst of Coronavirus Crisis
"We HAVE to be able to respond to people's needs. People don't have this time."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among a number of progressives angered by news Wednesday that the Senate intends to take a long recess--reportedly until April 20--while the coronavirus crisis roils the country and threatens the lives and economic well-being of millions of Americans.
"This is completely dangerous and unacceptable," the freshmen Democrat from New York tweeted.
\u201cThe Senate might ADJOURN FOR A MONTH after this bill?\n\nThis is completely dangerous and unacceptable. We HAVE to be able to respond to people\u2019s needs.\n\nPeople don\u2019t have this time. Even IF the Senate can even return on the 20th (big IF) that may not be enough time to solve May.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1585154976
Brooklyn-based activist Linda Sarsour also took to Twitter to express her disgust with the lawmakers' decision.
"We have a crisis of leadership in this country," said Sarsour. "They are giving up and we are not even at peak yet with the virus. Leaving the America people out to dry."
The news of the Senate's intention to break for almost a month during the ongoing crisis comes as the upper chamber prepares to vote on a $2 trillion legislative package that critics say is a giveaway to the rich and large corporations. Because the Senate has no remote voting procedures in place, there will be no further legislative action to relieve the American people from the crisis until April 20 and the Senate bill will have to be voted on in the House.
Crooked Media editor-in-chief Brian Beutler noted how Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is using the recess as a tool in a game of congressional chicken.
"House could have jammed the Senate with a genuinely good bill," tweeted Beutler. "Instead it's happening the other way around. And there are still no remote voting procedures in place."
Observers called for senators to remain in Washington not only to work on helping the public but also to limit the spread of the disease.
"Not only should neither chamber adjourn for the foreseeable future, no lawmaker should be leaving D.C., either," said New Republic writer Matt Ford. "Scattering them across the country mid-pandemic is a recipe for disaster."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among a number of progressives angered by news Wednesday that the Senate intends to take a long recess--reportedly until April 20--while the coronavirus crisis roils the country and threatens the lives and economic well-being of millions of Americans.
"This is completely dangerous and unacceptable," the freshmen Democrat from New York tweeted.
\u201cThe Senate might ADJOURN FOR A MONTH after this bill?\n\nThis is completely dangerous and unacceptable. We HAVE to be able to respond to people\u2019s needs.\n\nPeople don\u2019t have this time. Even IF the Senate can even return on the 20th (big IF) that may not be enough time to solve May.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1585154976
Brooklyn-based activist Linda Sarsour also took to Twitter to express her disgust with the lawmakers' decision.
"We have a crisis of leadership in this country," said Sarsour. "They are giving up and we are not even at peak yet with the virus. Leaving the America people out to dry."
The news of the Senate's intention to break for almost a month during the ongoing crisis comes as the upper chamber prepares to vote on a $2 trillion legislative package that critics say is a giveaway to the rich and large corporations. Because the Senate has no remote voting procedures in place, there will be no further legislative action to relieve the American people from the crisis until April 20 and the Senate bill will have to be voted on in the House.
Crooked Media editor-in-chief Brian Beutler noted how Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is using the recess as a tool in a game of congressional chicken.
"House could have jammed the Senate with a genuinely good bill," tweeted Beutler. "Instead it's happening the other way around. And there are still no remote voting procedures in place."
Observers called for senators to remain in Washington not only to work on helping the public but also to limit the spread of the disease.
"Not only should neither chamber adjourn for the foreseeable future, no lawmaker should be leaving D.C., either," said New Republic writer Matt Ford. "Scattering them across the country mid-pandemic is a recipe for disaster."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was among a number of progressives angered by news Wednesday that the Senate intends to take a long recess--reportedly until April 20--while the coronavirus crisis roils the country and threatens the lives and economic well-being of millions of Americans.
"This is completely dangerous and unacceptable," the freshmen Democrat from New York tweeted.
\u201cThe Senate might ADJOURN FOR A MONTH after this bill?\n\nThis is completely dangerous and unacceptable. We HAVE to be able to respond to people\u2019s needs.\n\nPeople don\u2019t have this time. Even IF the Senate can even return on the 20th (big IF) that may not be enough time to solve May.\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1585154976
Brooklyn-based activist Linda Sarsour also took to Twitter to express her disgust with the lawmakers' decision.
"We have a crisis of leadership in this country," said Sarsour. "They are giving up and we are not even at peak yet with the virus. Leaving the America people out to dry."
The news of the Senate's intention to break for almost a month during the ongoing crisis comes as the upper chamber prepares to vote on a $2 trillion legislative package that critics say is a giveaway to the rich and large corporations. Because the Senate has no remote voting procedures in place, there will be no further legislative action to relieve the American people from the crisis until April 20 and the Senate bill will have to be voted on in the House.
Crooked Media editor-in-chief Brian Beutler noted how Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) is using the recess as a tool in a game of congressional chicken.
"House could have jammed the Senate with a genuinely good bill," tweeted Beutler. "Instead it's happening the other way around. And there are still no remote voting procedures in place."
Observers called for senators to remain in Washington not only to work on helping the public but also to limit the spread of the disease.
"Not only should neither chamber adjourn for the foreseeable future, no lawmaker should be leaving D.C., either," said New Republic writer Matt Ford. "Scattering them across the country mid-pandemic is a recipe for disaster."