Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) tested positive for the coronavirus, he announced Sunday. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)
With at Least Three Members of US Congress Infected With Coronavirus, Calls for Remote Voting Grow
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health."
With at least three members of Congress as well as the spouse of at least one senator testing positive for the coronavirus which has now spread to more than 41,000 Americans and killed more than 450, lawmakers are pushing their leadership to institute new rules allowing for remote voting.
More than 60 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to House leadership on Monday calling for emergency remote voting.
"Requiring members to vote in person may pose public health risks or even be physically impossible for persons under quarantine," the letter reads. "We need to provide a mechanism through which Congress can act during times of crisis without having to assemble in one place."
The call followed the positive coronavirus tests of at least three lawmakers. Rep. Ben McAdams (D-Utah) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fl.) tested positive last week, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) announced Sunday he had tested positive. Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D-Minn.) husband also revealed Monday he had contracted the coronavirus.
Paul did not self-isolate after getting tested, and crossed paths with other colleagues in the Senate swimming pool while awaiting his results as well as eating with other senators at several lunches.
The news of Paul's diagnosis led Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to self-quarantine. Other lawmakers have also spent weeks in isolation since the coronavirus outbreak reached Capitol Hill earlier this month.
On social media, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) was among those calling on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other congressional leaders to allow remote voting to ensure members of Congress can negotiate and vote on an economic stimulus package and other legislation without risking contracting the coronavirus.
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health," Porter wrote, as Americans across the country are working from home, staying home from school, and closing restaurants and other small businesses to help curb the outbreak.
According to CBS News, a swift rules change is unlikely. The last significant amendment to voting rules in Congress happened in 1973--after three years of debate--to allow electronic voting in the Senate and House chambers.
Some in Congress have suggested passing legislation via voice votes or unanimous consent so that all members don't need to be present and have argued remote voting is not feasible because it could open the door to court challenges to any bills passed remotely.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) slammed some of his colleagues for their reluctance to adapt to the current public health crisis, as millions of Americans have.
"There are a bunch of so-called institutionalists who are resisting remote voting but we could soon lack a quorum due to mandatory self quarantine," Schatz tweeted. "We MUST operate like plenty of American corporations and other organizations and enable voting electronically or by phone."
Other political observers called on members of Congress to view their current dilemma as a catalyst for rethinking how all voting works in the U.S. democratic process.
"If the GOP supports remote voting for members of Congress," ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd tweeted, "then Democrats should insist the same privilege be given to voters in elections through vote at home, vote by mail, etc."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
With at least three members of Congress as well as the spouse of at least one senator testing positive for the coronavirus which has now spread to more than 41,000 Americans and killed more than 450, lawmakers are pushing their leadership to institute new rules allowing for remote voting.
More than 60 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to House leadership on Monday calling for emergency remote voting.
"Requiring members to vote in person may pose public health risks or even be physically impossible for persons under quarantine," the letter reads. "We need to provide a mechanism through which Congress can act during times of crisis without having to assemble in one place."
The call followed the positive coronavirus tests of at least three lawmakers. Rep. Ben McAdams (D-Utah) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fl.) tested positive last week, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) announced Sunday he had tested positive. Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D-Minn.) husband also revealed Monday he had contracted the coronavirus.
Paul did not self-isolate after getting tested, and crossed paths with other colleagues in the Senate swimming pool while awaiting his results as well as eating with other senators at several lunches.
The news of Paul's diagnosis led Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to self-quarantine. Other lawmakers have also spent weeks in isolation since the coronavirus outbreak reached Capitol Hill earlier this month.
On social media, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) was among those calling on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other congressional leaders to allow remote voting to ensure members of Congress can negotiate and vote on an economic stimulus package and other legislation without risking contracting the coronavirus.
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health," Porter wrote, as Americans across the country are working from home, staying home from school, and closing restaurants and other small businesses to help curb the outbreak.
According to CBS News, a swift rules change is unlikely. The last significant amendment to voting rules in Congress happened in 1973--after three years of debate--to allow electronic voting in the Senate and House chambers.
Some in Congress have suggested passing legislation via voice votes or unanimous consent so that all members don't need to be present and have argued remote voting is not feasible because it could open the door to court challenges to any bills passed remotely.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) slammed some of his colleagues for their reluctance to adapt to the current public health crisis, as millions of Americans have.
"There are a bunch of so-called institutionalists who are resisting remote voting but we could soon lack a quorum due to mandatory self quarantine," Schatz tweeted. "We MUST operate like plenty of American corporations and other organizations and enable voting electronically or by phone."
Other political observers called on members of Congress to view their current dilemma as a catalyst for rethinking how all voting works in the U.S. democratic process.
"If the GOP supports remote voting for members of Congress," ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd tweeted, "then Democrats should insist the same privilege be given to voters in elections through vote at home, vote by mail, etc."
With at least three members of Congress as well as the spouse of at least one senator testing positive for the coronavirus which has now spread to more than 41,000 Americans and killed more than 450, lawmakers are pushing their leadership to institute new rules allowing for remote voting.
More than 60 lawmakers from both sides of the aisle sent a letter to House leadership on Monday calling for emergency remote voting.
"Requiring members to vote in person may pose public health risks or even be physically impossible for persons under quarantine," the letter reads. "We need to provide a mechanism through which Congress can act during times of crisis without having to assemble in one place."
The call followed the positive coronavirus tests of at least three lawmakers. Rep. Ben McAdams (D-Utah) and Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fl.) tested positive last week, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) announced Sunday he had tested positive. Sen. Amy Klobuchar's (D-Minn.) husband also revealed Monday he had contracted the coronavirus.
Paul did not self-isolate after getting tested, and crossed paths with other colleagues in the Senate swimming pool while awaiting his results as well as eating with other senators at several lunches.
The news of Paul's diagnosis led Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to self-quarantine. Other lawmakers have also spent weeks in isolation since the coronavirus outbreak reached Capitol Hill earlier this month.
On social media, Rep. Katie Porter (D-Calif.) was among those calling on House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and other congressional leaders to allow remote voting to ensure members of Congress can negotiate and vote on an economic stimulus package and other legislation without risking contracting the coronavirus.
"Congress should be an example, not an exception, on public health," Porter wrote, as Americans across the country are working from home, staying home from school, and closing restaurants and other small businesses to help curb the outbreak.
According to CBS News, a swift rules change is unlikely. The last significant amendment to voting rules in Congress happened in 1973--after three years of debate--to allow electronic voting in the Senate and House chambers.
Some in Congress have suggested passing legislation via voice votes or unanimous consent so that all members don't need to be present and have argued remote voting is not feasible because it could open the door to court challenges to any bills passed remotely.
Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) slammed some of his colleagues for their reluctance to adapt to the current public health crisis, as millions of Americans have.
"There are a bunch of so-called institutionalists who are resisting remote voting but we could soon lack a quorum due to mandatory self quarantine," Schatz tweeted. "We MUST operate like plenty of American corporations and other organizations and enable voting electronically or by phone."
Other political observers called on members of Congress to view their current dilemma as a catalyst for rethinking how all voting works in the U.S. democratic process.
"If the GOP supports remote voting for members of Congress," ABC News political analyst Matthew Dowd tweeted, "then Democrats should insist the same privilege be given to voters in elections through vote at home, vote by mail, etc."