A Wisconsin appeals court overturned a ruling that would have allowed the purge of more than 200,000 from the state voter rolls before the 2020 general election. (Photo: Chuck Burton/Associated Press)
Feb 27, 2020
Voting rights advocates applauded a Wisconsin appeals court ruling Friday which is set to stop a voter purge from going forward--sparing more than 200,000 people from having their names removed from voter lists.
A three-judge panel unanimously rejected a lawsuit filed by conservative law group Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty arguing that the voter purge of about 209,000 should go forward ahead of the 2020 election.
The decision represented "good news for democracy for all," tweeted Mary Kay Henry, president of the SEIU.
\u201cGood news for democracy for all!\nhttps://t.co/TdBNBhLae6\u201d— Mary Kay Henry (@Mary Kay Henry) 1582915592
The voter purge was put on hold last month while the 4th District Court of Appeals considered the case.
As Common Dreams reported in December, voters across Wisconsin were notified last year that their names would be removed from the rolls if they did not confirm their address with the state election commission. The state told residents the purge would not take place until 2021, spurring the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty to attempt to institute the purge before the general election in November.
More than half of the voters who were targeted for the purge lived in districts that Hillary Clinton won in 2016. President Donald Trump carried the state with fewer than 23,000 more votes than Clinton, making the purge of likely Democratic voters even more consequential.
Pro-democracy think tank Demos wrote that the "discriminatory" purge would have "disproportionately [removed] voters of color from the rolls."
\u201c\ud83d\udc40Looks like the discriminatory voter purge won't be happening in #Wisconsin. \n\nOur research showed this purge would disproportionately remove voters of color from the rolls: https://t.co/bv2STeogjg\u201d— Demos (@Demos) 1582915631
In Wisconsin, purged voters can register again later or on Election Day when they show up at the polls, assuming they have the required documentation. However, when the purge was originally approved last year, the state Democratic Party warned the move would prevent eligible voters from voting.
"A win over voter suppression is a win for the people of Wisconsin," tweeted Democratic state Rep. David Crowley in response to Friday's ruling.
The Wisconsin Democratic Party warned Friday that the case would likely be appealed to the state Supreme Court, and called on voters in the state to support Judge Jill Karofsky in the upcoming judicial election on April 7. Karofsky is running against Judge Dan Kelly, who has been endorsed by Trump and was appointed to the court by former Republican Gov. Scott Walker.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8WI Appeals Court blocks the voter purge! \ud83d\udea8\n\nBUT: this means that when purge case is appealed State Supreme Court, Trump-endorsed/Walker-appointed Dan Kelly can cast tie-breaking vote to purge the voters\u2014UNLESS, if timing works, we beat him on April 7. \n\nVote Jill Karofsky! https://t.co/mjzg422mjN\u201d— Ben Wikler (@Ben Wikler) 1582911129
"When purge case is appealed State Supreme Court," state party chair Ben Wikler tweeted, "Dan Kelly can cast tie-breaking vote to purge the voters--UNLESS, if timing works, we beat him on April 7."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Voting rights advocates applauded a Wisconsin appeals court ruling Friday which is set to stop a voter purge from going forward--sparing more than 200,000 people from having their names removed from voter lists.
A three-judge panel unanimously rejected a lawsuit filed by conservative law group Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty arguing that the voter purge of about 209,000 should go forward ahead of the 2020 election.
The decision represented "good news for democracy for all," tweeted Mary Kay Henry, president of the SEIU.
\u201cGood news for democracy for all!\nhttps://t.co/TdBNBhLae6\u201d— Mary Kay Henry (@Mary Kay Henry) 1582915592
The voter purge was put on hold last month while the 4th District Court of Appeals considered the case.
As Common Dreams reported in December, voters across Wisconsin were notified last year that their names would be removed from the rolls if they did not confirm their address with the state election commission. The state told residents the purge would not take place until 2021, spurring the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty to attempt to institute the purge before the general election in November.
More than half of the voters who were targeted for the purge lived in districts that Hillary Clinton won in 2016. President Donald Trump carried the state with fewer than 23,000 more votes than Clinton, making the purge of likely Democratic voters even more consequential.
Pro-democracy think tank Demos wrote that the "discriminatory" purge would have "disproportionately [removed] voters of color from the rolls."
\u201c\ud83d\udc40Looks like the discriminatory voter purge won't be happening in #Wisconsin. \n\nOur research showed this purge would disproportionately remove voters of color from the rolls: https://t.co/bv2STeogjg\u201d— Demos (@Demos) 1582915631
In Wisconsin, purged voters can register again later or on Election Day when they show up at the polls, assuming they have the required documentation. However, when the purge was originally approved last year, the state Democratic Party warned the move would prevent eligible voters from voting.
"A win over voter suppression is a win for the people of Wisconsin," tweeted Democratic state Rep. David Crowley in response to Friday's ruling.
The Wisconsin Democratic Party warned Friday that the case would likely be appealed to the state Supreme Court, and called on voters in the state to support Judge Jill Karofsky in the upcoming judicial election on April 7. Karofsky is running against Judge Dan Kelly, who has been endorsed by Trump and was appointed to the court by former Republican Gov. Scott Walker.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8WI Appeals Court blocks the voter purge! \ud83d\udea8\n\nBUT: this means that when purge case is appealed State Supreme Court, Trump-endorsed/Walker-appointed Dan Kelly can cast tie-breaking vote to purge the voters\u2014UNLESS, if timing works, we beat him on April 7. \n\nVote Jill Karofsky! https://t.co/mjzg422mjN\u201d— Ben Wikler (@Ben Wikler) 1582911129
"When purge case is appealed State Supreme Court," state party chair Ben Wikler tweeted, "Dan Kelly can cast tie-breaking vote to purge the voters--UNLESS, if timing works, we beat him on April 7."
Voting rights advocates applauded a Wisconsin appeals court ruling Friday which is set to stop a voter purge from going forward--sparing more than 200,000 people from having their names removed from voter lists.
A three-judge panel unanimously rejected a lawsuit filed by conservative law group Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty arguing that the voter purge of about 209,000 should go forward ahead of the 2020 election.
The decision represented "good news for democracy for all," tweeted Mary Kay Henry, president of the SEIU.
\u201cGood news for democracy for all!\nhttps://t.co/TdBNBhLae6\u201d— Mary Kay Henry (@Mary Kay Henry) 1582915592
The voter purge was put on hold last month while the 4th District Court of Appeals considered the case.
As Common Dreams reported in December, voters across Wisconsin were notified last year that their names would be removed from the rolls if they did not confirm their address with the state election commission. The state told residents the purge would not take place until 2021, spurring the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty to attempt to institute the purge before the general election in November.
More than half of the voters who were targeted for the purge lived in districts that Hillary Clinton won in 2016. President Donald Trump carried the state with fewer than 23,000 more votes than Clinton, making the purge of likely Democratic voters even more consequential.
Pro-democracy think tank Demos wrote that the "discriminatory" purge would have "disproportionately [removed] voters of color from the rolls."
\u201c\ud83d\udc40Looks like the discriminatory voter purge won't be happening in #Wisconsin. \n\nOur research showed this purge would disproportionately remove voters of color from the rolls: https://t.co/bv2STeogjg\u201d— Demos (@Demos) 1582915631
In Wisconsin, purged voters can register again later or on Election Day when they show up at the polls, assuming they have the required documentation. However, when the purge was originally approved last year, the state Democratic Party warned the move would prevent eligible voters from voting.
"A win over voter suppression is a win for the people of Wisconsin," tweeted Democratic state Rep. David Crowley in response to Friday's ruling.
The Wisconsin Democratic Party warned Friday that the case would likely be appealed to the state Supreme Court, and called on voters in the state to support Judge Jill Karofsky in the upcoming judicial election on April 7. Karofsky is running against Judge Dan Kelly, who has been endorsed by Trump and was appointed to the court by former Republican Gov. Scott Walker.
\u201c\ud83d\udea8WI Appeals Court blocks the voter purge! \ud83d\udea8\n\nBUT: this means that when purge case is appealed State Supreme Court, Trump-endorsed/Walker-appointed Dan Kelly can cast tie-breaking vote to purge the voters\u2014UNLESS, if timing works, we beat him on April 7. \n\nVote Jill Karofsky! https://t.co/mjzg422mjN\u201d— Ben Wikler (@Ben Wikler) 1582911129
"When purge case is appealed State Supreme Court," state party chair Ben Wikler tweeted, "Dan Kelly can cast tie-breaking vote to purge the voters--UNLESS, if timing works, we beat him on April 7."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.