Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), speaks at a press conference while Reps. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Doug Collins (R-Ga.) listen on July 24, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)
Feb 26, 2020
Still in an uproar over comments by Sen. Bernie Sanders praising the literacy program that generations of Cubans have benefited from--one that has provided the nation among the highest literacy rates in the world--Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives announced Thursday their plan to force a vote on a non-binding resolution to condemn those who would praise the goodness of teaching people to read.
According to Politico:
the GOP plans to offer an amendment disapproving of Sanders' recent interview on "60 minutes," during which the Vermont independent lauded Castro's literacy programs and argued it's "unfair to simply say everything [in Cuba] is bad." The language is expected to chastise Sanders for ignoring systematic human rights abuses committed by Castro's communist regime.
Despite right-wing attacks following his comments on Sunday, Sanders did not shy away from what he said about Cuba's social services--including its world-class education and healthcare systems--during Tuesday night's Democratic debate in South Carolina.
"What Barack Obama said was [the Castro government] made great progress on education and health care," Sanders said from the debate stage. "That was Barack Obama."
While Sanders repeated his denunciation of authoritarinism in all its forms, he did not retract his compliments of Cuba's literacy program, even though it was launched under the leadership of former President Fidel Castro, the communist leader of the Cuban Revolution.
During his remarks announcing the GOP resolution on Thursday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Democrats faced with voting for or against it will have a choice: "Do they stand with Bernie or do they stand for freedom?"
Progressive critics have so far treated the effort to smear Sanders over his comments as a pathetic gimmick by nervous right-wing forces increasingly scared of his new front-runner status in the Democratic presidential primary.
\u201cThe GOP fired up to criticize people for having learned how to read.\n\nAt least they are consistent\u201d— Jessica Baker (@Jessica Baker) 1582765383
"I've had it with people speaking for our Cuban-American community and simply using us as a political football to hurt Sanders, an honest and genuine candidate fighting for democracy and better living conditions for all of us," wrote Carlos Calzadilla-Palacio, president of Young Progressives of America and an immigration activist, in a Latino Rebels op-ed Tuesday.
\u201cIt's extremely frustrating hearing political hacks who have no ties to the Cuban-American community attacking Bernie on Cuba and acting as an authority on the subject while pretending to care. \n\nBernie said nothing wrong, President Obama and Jimmy Carter have made similar remarks\u201d— Carlos J Calzadilla (@Carlos J Calzadilla) 1582579372
"This is really just about undermining Sanders after he wiped the floor in a landslide victory in Nevada," Calzadilla-Palacio argued in his op-ed, "where he won 70% of the Latino vote."
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Still in an uproar over comments by Sen. Bernie Sanders praising the literacy program that generations of Cubans have benefited from--one that has provided the nation among the highest literacy rates in the world--Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives announced Thursday their plan to force a vote on a non-binding resolution to condemn those who would praise the goodness of teaching people to read.
According to Politico:
the GOP plans to offer an amendment disapproving of Sanders' recent interview on "60 minutes," during which the Vermont independent lauded Castro's literacy programs and argued it's "unfair to simply say everything [in Cuba] is bad." The language is expected to chastise Sanders for ignoring systematic human rights abuses committed by Castro's communist regime.
Despite right-wing attacks following his comments on Sunday, Sanders did not shy away from what he said about Cuba's social services--including its world-class education and healthcare systems--during Tuesday night's Democratic debate in South Carolina.
"What Barack Obama said was [the Castro government] made great progress on education and health care," Sanders said from the debate stage. "That was Barack Obama."
While Sanders repeated his denunciation of authoritarinism in all its forms, he did not retract his compliments of Cuba's literacy program, even though it was launched under the leadership of former President Fidel Castro, the communist leader of the Cuban Revolution.
During his remarks announcing the GOP resolution on Thursday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Democrats faced with voting for or against it will have a choice: "Do they stand with Bernie or do they stand for freedom?"
Progressive critics have so far treated the effort to smear Sanders over his comments as a pathetic gimmick by nervous right-wing forces increasingly scared of his new front-runner status in the Democratic presidential primary.
\u201cThe GOP fired up to criticize people for having learned how to read.\n\nAt least they are consistent\u201d— Jessica Baker (@Jessica Baker) 1582765383
"I've had it with people speaking for our Cuban-American community and simply using us as a political football to hurt Sanders, an honest and genuine candidate fighting for democracy and better living conditions for all of us," wrote Carlos Calzadilla-Palacio, president of Young Progressives of America and an immigration activist, in a Latino Rebels op-ed Tuesday.
\u201cIt's extremely frustrating hearing political hacks who have no ties to the Cuban-American community attacking Bernie on Cuba and acting as an authority on the subject while pretending to care. \n\nBernie said nothing wrong, President Obama and Jimmy Carter have made similar remarks\u201d— Carlos J Calzadilla (@Carlos J Calzadilla) 1582579372
"This is really just about undermining Sanders after he wiped the floor in a landslide victory in Nevada," Calzadilla-Palacio argued in his op-ed, "where he won 70% of the Latino vote."
Still in an uproar over comments by Sen. Bernie Sanders praising the literacy program that generations of Cubans have benefited from--one that has provided the nation among the highest literacy rates in the world--Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives announced Thursday their plan to force a vote on a non-binding resolution to condemn those who would praise the goodness of teaching people to read.
According to Politico:
the GOP plans to offer an amendment disapproving of Sanders' recent interview on "60 minutes," during which the Vermont independent lauded Castro's literacy programs and argued it's "unfair to simply say everything [in Cuba] is bad." The language is expected to chastise Sanders for ignoring systematic human rights abuses committed by Castro's communist regime.
Despite right-wing attacks following his comments on Sunday, Sanders did not shy away from what he said about Cuba's social services--including its world-class education and healthcare systems--during Tuesday night's Democratic debate in South Carolina.
"What Barack Obama said was [the Castro government] made great progress on education and health care," Sanders said from the debate stage. "That was Barack Obama."
While Sanders repeated his denunciation of authoritarinism in all its forms, he did not retract his compliments of Cuba's literacy program, even though it was launched under the leadership of former President Fidel Castro, the communist leader of the Cuban Revolution.
During his remarks announcing the GOP resolution on Thursday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Democrats faced with voting for or against it will have a choice: "Do they stand with Bernie or do they stand for freedom?"
Progressive critics have so far treated the effort to smear Sanders over his comments as a pathetic gimmick by nervous right-wing forces increasingly scared of his new front-runner status in the Democratic presidential primary.
\u201cThe GOP fired up to criticize people for having learned how to read.\n\nAt least they are consistent\u201d— Jessica Baker (@Jessica Baker) 1582765383
"I've had it with people speaking for our Cuban-American community and simply using us as a political football to hurt Sanders, an honest and genuine candidate fighting for democracy and better living conditions for all of us," wrote Carlos Calzadilla-Palacio, president of Young Progressives of America and an immigration activist, in a Latino Rebels op-ed Tuesday.
\u201cIt's extremely frustrating hearing political hacks who have no ties to the Cuban-American community attacking Bernie on Cuba and acting as an authority on the subject while pretending to care. \n\nBernie said nothing wrong, President Obama and Jimmy Carter have made similar remarks\u201d— Carlos J Calzadilla (@Carlos J Calzadilla) 1582579372
"This is really just about undermining Sanders after he wiped the floor in a landslide victory in Nevada," Calzadilla-Palacio argued in his op-ed, "where he won 70% of the Latino vote."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.