SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), speaks at a press conference while Reps. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) and Doug Collins (R-Ga.) listen on July 24, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wroblewski/Getty Images)
GOP Plotting Resolution to Condemn... Teaching Children and Adults to Read
"I've had it with people speaking for our Cuban-American community and simply using us as a political football to hurt Sanders," said one critic of the recent smear effort.
Feb 26, 2020
Still in an uproar over comments by Sen. Bernie Sanders praising the literacy program that generations of Cubans have benefited from--one that has provided the nation among the highest literacy rates in the world-- Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives announced Thursday their plan to force a vote on a non-binding resolution to condemn those who would praise the goodness of teaching people to read.
According to Politico:
the GOP plans to offer an amendment disapproving of Sanders' recent interview on "60 minutes," during which the Vermont independent lauded Castro's literacy programs and argued it's "unfair to simply say everything [in Cuba] is bad." The language is expected to chastise Sanders for ignoring systematic human rights abuses committed by Castro's communist regime.
Despite right-wing attacks following his comments on Sunday, Sanders did not shy away from what he said about Cuba's social services--including its world-class education and healthcare systems--during Tuesday night's Democratic debate in South Carolina.
"What Barack Obama said was [the Castro government] made great progress on education and health care," Sanders said from the debate stage. "That was Barack Obama."
While Sanders repeated his denunciation of authoritarinism in all its forms, he did not retract his compliments of Cuba's literacy program, even though it was launched under the leadership of former President Fidel Castro, the communist leader of the Cuban Revolution.
During his remarks announcing the GOP resolution on Thursday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Democrats faced with voting for or against it will have a choice: "Do they stand with Bernie or do they stand for freedom?"
Progressive critics have so far treated the effort to smear Sanders over his comments as a pathetic gimmick by nervous right-wing forces increasingly scared of his new front-runner status in the Democratic presidential primary.
"I've had it with people speaking for our Cuban-American community and simply using us as a political football to hurt Sanders, an honest and genuine candidate fighting for democracy and better living conditions for all of us," wrote Carlos Calzadilla-Palacio, president of Young Progressives of America and an immigration activist, in a Latino Rebels op-ed Tuesday.
"This is really just about undermining Sanders after he wiped the floor in a landslide victory in Nevada," Calzadilla-Palacio argued in his op-ed, "where he won 70% of the Latino vote."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Still in an uproar over comments by Sen. Bernie Sanders praising the literacy program that generations of Cubans have benefited from--one that has provided the nation among the highest literacy rates in the world-- Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives announced Thursday their plan to force a vote on a non-binding resolution to condemn those who would praise the goodness of teaching people to read.
According to Politico:
the GOP plans to offer an amendment disapproving of Sanders' recent interview on "60 minutes," during which the Vermont independent lauded Castro's literacy programs and argued it's "unfair to simply say everything [in Cuba] is bad." The language is expected to chastise Sanders for ignoring systematic human rights abuses committed by Castro's communist regime.
Despite right-wing attacks following his comments on Sunday, Sanders did not shy away from what he said about Cuba's social services--including its world-class education and healthcare systems--during Tuesday night's Democratic debate in South Carolina.
"What Barack Obama said was [the Castro government] made great progress on education and health care," Sanders said from the debate stage. "That was Barack Obama."
While Sanders repeated his denunciation of authoritarinism in all its forms, he did not retract his compliments of Cuba's literacy program, even though it was launched under the leadership of former President Fidel Castro, the communist leader of the Cuban Revolution.
During his remarks announcing the GOP resolution on Thursday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Democrats faced with voting for or against it will have a choice: "Do they stand with Bernie or do they stand for freedom?"
Progressive critics have so far treated the effort to smear Sanders over his comments as a pathetic gimmick by nervous right-wing forces increasingly scared of his new front-runner status in the Democratic presidential primary.
"I've had it with people speaking for our Cuban-American community and simply using us as a political football to hurt Sanders, an honest and genuine candidate fighting for democracy and better living conditions for all of us," wrote Carlos Calzadilla-Palacio, president of Young Progressives of America and an immigration activist, in a Latino Rebels op-ed Tuesday.
"This is really just about undermining Sanders after he wiped the floor in a landslide victory in Nevada," Calzadilla-Palacio argued in his op-ed, "where he won 70% of the Latino vote."
Still in an uproar over comments by Sen. Bernie Sanders praising the literacy program that generations of Cubans have benefited from--one that has provided the nation among the highest literacy rates in the world-- Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives announced Thursday their plan to force a vote on a non-binding resolution to condemn those who would praise the goodness of teaching people to read.
According to Politico:
the GOP plans to offer an amendment disapproving of Sanders' recent interview on "60 minutes," during which the Vermont independent lauded Castro's literacy programs and argued it's "unfair to simply say everything [in Cuba] is bad." The language is expected to chastise Sanders for ignoring systematic human rights abuses committed by Castro's communist regime.
Despite right-wing attacks following his comments on Sunday, Sanders did not shy away from what he said about Cuba's social services--including its world-class education and healthcare systems--during Tuesday night's Democratic debate in South Carolina.
"What Barack Obama said was [the Castro government] made great progress on education and health care," Sanders said from the debate stage. "That was Barack Obama."
While Sanders repeated his denunciation of authoritarinism in all its forms, he did not retract his compliments of Cuba's literacy program, even though it was launched under the leadership of former President Fidel Castro, the communist leader of the Cuban Revolution.
During his remarks announcing the GOP resolution on Thursday, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy said Democrats faced with voting for or against it will have a choice: "Do they stand with Bernie or do they stand for freedom?"
Progressive critics have so far treated the effort to smear Sanders over his comments as a pathetic gimmick by nervous right-wing forces increasingly scared of his new front-runner status in the Democratic presidential primary.
"I've had it with people speaking for our Cuban-American community and simply using us as a political football to hurt Sanders, an honest and genuine candidate fighting for democracy and better living conditions for all of us," wrote Carlos Calzadilla-Palacio, president of Young Progressives of America and an immigration activist, in a Latino Rebels op-ed Tuesday.
"This is really just about undermining Sanders after he wiped the floor in a landslide victory in Nevada," Calzadilla-Palacio argued in his op-ed, "where he won 70% of the Latino vote."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.