In the U.S. Senate trial of President Donald Trump Thursday evening, Chief U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Roberts read a question from Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) regarding whether the absense of witnesses and evidence in the trial "contributes to the loss of legitimacy" of the chief justice. (Photo: C-Span/screenshot)
In 'Legacy-Defining' Moment, Roberts Forced to Read Warren's Question About His Legitimacy at Impeachment Trial
Some Democrats have called on the chief justice to override the GOP's refusal to call witnesses.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was forced Thursday night to publicly reckon with the impact that Senate Republicans' management of the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump is likely having on his legacy and the high court's future legitimacy.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) submitted a question to the House impeachment managers, which was read by the chief justice, targeting the actions taken by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his party to block efforts to subpoena witnesses.
"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government," Roberts read, "does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, or Constitution?"
\u201cWOW. Chief Justice John Roberts just had to read aloud Sen. Elizabeth Warren's question...about whether he loses credibility for presiding over a trial without witnesses or evidence. https://t.co/vG08pjmhZH\u201d— Heather Monahan (@Heather Monahan) 1580424642
The question created a "legacy-defining" moment for Roberts, tweeted Leah Greenberg, co-founder of the grassroots political action group Indivisible.
\u201c.@ewarren just created a legacy-defining moment for John Roberts. AND it was hilarious. I am dead.\u201d— Leah Greenberg (@Leah Greenberg) 1580427796
Some Democrats have called on Roberts, in his capacity as the official presiding over the impeachment trial, override the Republican Party and order documents to be subpoenaed and witnesses to appear at the proceedings, in the interest of having a fair hearing.
Roberts may be forced to break a tie vote on Friday. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is the last remaining Republican who has not stated whether she will join Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and all 47 Democrats in voting to call witnesses. If Murkowski votes in favor of witnesses it would split the chamber 50-50.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is leading the Democratic impeachment managers in arguing the case against Trump, addressed Warren's question.
While hesitating to endorse Warren's suggestion that Roberts is abdicating his duty as the nation's senior-most judge by allowing a trial to proceed without witnesses, Schiff allowed that the proceedings have reflected "adversely" on the U.S. Congress and the nation's democratic ideals.
"I think that will feed cynicism about this institution," Schiff said. "We can't even get a fair trial. We can't even get a fair shake for the American people... Yes, senator, if they don't get that fair trial it will just further the cynicism that is corrosive to this institution and to our democracy."
On social media, some posited that Roberts's expression directly after reading the question betrayed the chief justice's view of how the trial has harmed his legitimacy and legacy.
"Yup," tweeted journalist David Roberts.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was forced Thursday night to publicly reckon with the impact that Senate Republicans' management of the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump is likely having on his legacy and the high court's future legitimacy.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) submitted a question to the House impeachment managers, which was read by the chief justice, targeting the actions taken by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his party to block efforts to subpoena witnesses.
"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government," Roberts read, "does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, or Constitution?"
\u201cWOW. Chief Justice John Roberts just had to read aloud Sen. Elizabeth Warren's question...about whether he loses credibility for presiding over a trial without witnesses or evidence. https://t.co/vG08pjmhZH\u201d— Heather Monahan (@Heather Monahan) 1580424642
The question created a "legacy-defining" moment for Roberts, tweeted Leah Greenberg, co-founder of the grassroots political action group Indivisible.
\u201c.@ewarren just created a legacy-defining moment for John Roberts. AND it was hilarious. I am dead.\u201d— Leah Greenberg (@Leah Greenberg) 1580427796
Some Democrats have called on Roberts, in his capacity as the official presiding over the impeachment trial, override the Republican Party and order documents to be subpoenaed and witnesses to appear at the proceedings, in the interest of having a fair hearing.
Roberts may be forced to break a tie vote on Friday. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is the last remaining Republican who has not stated whether she will join Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and all 47 Democrats in voting to call witnesses. If Murkowski votes in favor of witnesses it would split the chamber 50-50.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is leading the Democratic impeachment managers in arguing the case against Trump, addressed Warren's question.
While hesitating to endorse Warren's suggestion that Roberts is abdicating his duty as the nation's senior-most judge by allowing a trial to proceed without witnesses, Schiff allowed that the proceedings have reflected "adversely" on the U.S. Congress and the nation's democratic ideals.
"I think that will feed cynicism about this institution," Schiff said. "We can't even get a fair trial. We can't even get a fair shake for the American people... Yes, senator, if they don't get that fair trial it will just further the cynicism that is corrosive to this institution and to our democracy."
On social media, some posited that Roberts's expression directly after reading the question betrayed the chief justice's view of how the trial has harmed his legitimacy and legacy.
"Yup," tweeted journalist David Roberts.
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts was forced Thursday night to publicly reckon with the impact that Senate Republicans' management of the impeachment trial of President Donald Trump is likely having on his legacy and the high court's future legitimacy.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) submitted a question to the House impeachment managers, which was read by the chief justice, targeting the actions taken by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and his party to block efforts to subpoena witnesses.
"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government," Roberts read, "does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, or Constitution?"
\u201cWOW. Chief Justice John Roberts just had to read aloud Sen. Elizabeth Warren's question...about whether he loses credibility for presiding over a trial without witnesses or evidence. https://t.co/vG08pjmhZH\u201d— Heather Monahan (@Heather Monahan) 1580424642
The question created a "legacy-defining" moment for Roberts, tweeted Leah Greenberg, co-founder of the grassroots political action group Indivisible.
\u201c.@ewarren just created a legacy-defining moment for John Roberts. AND it was hilarious. I am dead.\u201d— Leah Greenberg (@Leah Greenberg) 1580427796
Some Democrats have called on Roberts, in his capacity as the official presiding over the impeachment trial, override the Republican Party and order documents to be subpoenaed and witnesses to appear at the proceedings, in the interest of having a fair hearing.
Roberts may be forced to break a tie vote on Friday. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) is the last remaining Republican who has not stated whether she will join Sens. Mitt Romney (R-Utah), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and all 47 Democrats in voting to call witnesses. If Murkowski votes in favor of witnesses it would split the chamber 50-50.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who is leading the Democratic impeachment managers in arguing the case against Trump, addressed Warren's question.
While hesitating to endorse Warren's suggestion that Roberts is abdicating his duty as the nation's senior-most judge by allowing a trial to proceed without witnesses, Schiff allowed that the proceedings have reflected "adversely" on the U.S. Congress and the nation's democratic ideals.
"I think that will feed cynicism about this institution," Schiff said. "We can't even get a fair trial. We can't even get a fair shake for the American people... Yes, senator, if they don't get that fair trial it will just further the cynicism that is corrosive to this institution and to our democracy."
On social media, some posited that Roberts's expression directly after reading the question betrayed the chief justice's view of how the trial has harmed his legitimacy and legacy.
"Yup," tweeted journalist David Roberts.