SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Demonstrators hold signs at a rally to mark the 70th anniversary of the Social Security Act on Aug. 11, 2005 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
41 Senators Urge Trump Administration to End 'Cruel and Dangerous' Effort to Cut Social Security Disability Benefits
"It is alarming that the agency appears more concerned with devoting limited resources toward making it harder for people with disabilities to receive essential benefits."
Jan 27, 2020
Ahead of a public comment period ending Friday, dozens of U.S. senators came together Tuesday in a letter opposing a Trump administration proposal that could cut off hundreds of thousands of people from an estimated $2.6 billion in Social Security disability benefits over a decade.
"This proposed rule appears to simply be another transparent attempt from the Trump administration to make it more difficult for Americans to access essential supports and benefits."
--41 senators
Alex Lawson, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works, told Common Dreams last month that the proposed rule change "is the Trump administration's most brazen attack on Social Security yet."
The rule, published in the Federal Register by the Social Security Administration (SSA) in November 2019, would force people to more frequently complete continuing disability reviews (CDR) to keep their benefits.
The senators wrote in their letter (pdf) to SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul Tuesday that "the proposed rule would dramatically increase the number of CDRs the agency conducts every year and burden millions of Americans with disabilities with more frequent, unjustified reviews of their eligibility for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits."
"At a time when leadership from SSA is sorely needed to further reduce unacceptably long disability application wait times and eliminate the disability backlog," declared the letter, "it is alarming that the agency appears more concerned with devoting limited resources toward making it harder for people with disabilities to receive essential benefits."
The letter accused the SSA of failing to justify the need for the specific changes, or fully examine the consequences, pointing out that the published proposal "does not even provide a cursory estimate of the number of people who will lose access to benefits earlier than they would have otherwise as a result of this rule."
"This proposed rule appears to simply be another transparent attempt from the Trump administration to make it more difficult for Americans to access essential supports and benefits," the letter concluded, urging SSA to withdraw it "immediately."
The four members of the upper chamber who are competing in a crowded field for the Democratic Party's 2020 presidential nomination--Sens. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--are all among the 41 signatories.
Democratic Sens. Bob Casey (Penn.) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio), two of the lawmakers who led the letter effort, spoke at a live-streamed #NoSocialSecurityCuts event Tuesday that also featured remarks from advocates for people with disabilities.
Casey said that those in government should wake up each morning and ask themselves at least one fundamental question: "Will I spend today advancing the cause of justice or not?" This proposed rule change, he continued, "is wrong. It's a mistake. It is certainly not in the interest of justice, and it's certainly adverse to the interests of people with disabilities."
Brown, who described the Trump administration's proposal as "simply mean-spirited," referenced President Donald Trump's comments last week--while attending the World Economic Forum's annual summit for the global elite--about pushing for further cuts to social programs.
Trump's remarks at Davos were also highlighted by Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Penn.), who joined the senators and activists speaking out Tuesday against the proposed rule change.
"It is wrong, it is cruel, and it is not in keeping with my vision and our vision of a just society," said Boyle.
"The administration is failing in a frontal attack, which would be passing legislation, so they're attempting an end run, using the rulemaking process and the powers of the executive to nip away and take kind of death by a thousand cuts of the Social Security program," the congressman added, "because that is the second act in a two-act plan to reduce the size of government and give away that money in tax cuts to the very wealthy."
Boyle attended the event on behalf of the more than 100 lawmakers in the House who have joined a separate letter he is leading to oppose the SSA rule, which is expected to be released in the coming days. The adminsitration's proposal also has been met with significant opposition from the public.
Over 114,000 people have submitted comments through a letter campaign sponsored by Social Security Works and other organizations opposed to the rule, and more than 10,000 have done so through a similar campaign by the Alliance for Retired Americans.
"This proposal is cruel and dangerous," Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, said in a statement Tuesday. "Social Security disability benefits are earned over years of hard work--just like retirement benefits. We should make it easier for people to claim the benefits they need and are eligible for, not harder."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Ahead of a public comment period ending Friday, dozens of U.S. senators came together Tuesday in a letter opposing a Trump administration proposal that could cut off hundreds of thousands of people from an estimated $2.6 billion in Social Security disability benefits over a decade.
"This proposed rule appears to simply be another transparent attempt from the Trump administration to make it more difficult for Americans to access essential supports and benefits."
--41 senators
Alex Lawson, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works, told Common Dreams last month that the proposed rule change "is the Trump administration's most brazen attack on Social Security yet."
The rule, published in the Federal Register by the Social Security Administration (SSA) in November 2019, would force people to more frequently complete continuing disability reviews (CDR) to keep their benefits.
The senators wrote in their letter (pdf) to SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul Tuesday that "the proposed rule would dramatically increase the number of CDRs the agency conducts every year and burden millions of Americans with disabilities with more frequent, unjustified reviews of their eligibility for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits."
"At a time when leadership from SSA is sorely needed to further reduce unacceptably long disability application wait times and eliminate the disability backlog," declared the letter, "it is alarming that the agency appears more concerned with devoting limited resources toward making it harder for people with disabilities to receive essential benefits."
The letter accused the SSA of failing to justify the need for the specific changes, or fully examine the consequences, pointing out that the published proposal "does not even provide a cursory estimate of the number of people who will lose access to benefits earlier than they would have otherwise as a result of this rule."
"This proposed rule appears to simply be another transparent attempt from the Trump administration to make it more difficult for Americans to access essential supports and benefits," the letter concluded, urging SSA to withdraw it "immediately."
The four members of the upper chamber who are competing in a crowded field for the Democratic Party's 2020 presidential nomination--Sens. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--are all among the 41 signatories.
Democratic Sens. Bob Casey (Penn.) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio), two of the lawmakers who led the letter effort, spoke at a live-streamed #NoSocialSecurityCuts event Tuesday that also featured remarks from advocates for people with disabilities.
Casey said that those in government should wake up each morning and ask themselves at least one fundamental question: "Will I spend today advancing the cause of justice or not?" This proposed rule change, he continued, "is wrong. It's a mistake. It is certainly not in the interest of justice, and it's certainly adverse to the interests of people with disabilities."
Brown, who described the Trump administration's proposal as "simply mean-spirited," referenced President Donald Trump's comments last week--while attending the World Economic Forum's annual summit for the global elite--about pushing for further cuts to social programs.
Trump's remarks at Davos were also highlighted by Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Penn.), who joined the senators and activists speaking out Tuesday against the proposed rule change.
"It is wrong, it is cruel, and it is not in keeping with my vision and our vision of a just society," said Boyle.
"The administration is failing in a frontal attack, which would be passing legislation, so they're attempting an end run, using the rulemaking process and the powers of the executive to nip away and take kind of death by a thousand cuts of the Social Security program," the congressman added, "because that is the second act in a two-act plan to reduce the size of government and give away that money in tax cuts to the very wealthy."
Boyle attended the event on behalf of the more than 100 lawmakers in the House who have joined a separate letter he is leading to oppose the SSA rule, which is expected to be released in the coming days. The adminsitration's proposal also has been met with significant opposition from the public.
Over 114,000 people have submitted comments through a letter campaign sponsored by Social Security Works and other organizations opposed to the rule, and more than 10,000 have done so through a similar campaign by the Alliance for Retired Americans.
"This proposal is cruel and dangerous," Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, said in a statement Tuesday. "Social Security disability benefits are earned over years of hard work--just like retirement benefits. We should make it easier for people to claim the benefits they need and are eligible for, not harder."
Ahead of a public comment period ending Friday, dozens of U.S. senators came together Tuesday in a letter opposing a Trump administration proposal that could cut off hundreds of thousands of people from an estimated $2.6 billion in Social Security disability benefits over a decade.
"This proposed rule appears to simply be another transparent attempt from the Trump administration to make it more difficult for Americans to access essential supports and benefits."
--41 senators
Alex Lawson, executive director of the progressive advocacy group Social Security Works, told Common Dreams last month that the proposed rule change "is the Trump administration's most brazen attack on Social Security yet."
The rule, published in the Federal Register by the Social Security Administration (SSA) in November 2019, would force people to more frequently complete continuing disability reviews (CDR) to keep their benefits.
The senators wrote in their letter (pdf) to SSA Commissioner Andrew M. Saul Tuesday that "the proposed rule would dramatically increase the number of CDRs the agency conducts every year and burden millions of Americans with disabilities with more frequent, unjustified reviews of their eligibility for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits."
"At a time when leadership from SSA is sorely needed to further reduce unacceptably long disability application wait times and eliminate the disability backlog," declared the letter, "it is alarming that the agency appears more concerned with devoting limited resources toward making it harder for people with disabilities to receive essential benefits."
The letter accused the SSA of failing to justify the need for the specific changes, or fully examine the consequences, pointing out that the published proposal "does not even provide a cursory estimate of the number of people who will lose access to benefits earlier than they would have otherwise as a result of this rule."
"This proposed rule appears to simply be another transparent attempt from the Trump administration to make it more difficult for Americans to access essential supports and benefits," the letter concluded, urging SSA to withdraw it "immediately."
The four members of the upper chamber who are competing in a crowded field for the Democratic Party's 2020 presidential nomination--Sens. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.)--are all among the 41 signatories.
Democratic Sens. Bob Casey (Penn.) and Sherrod Brown (Ohio), two of the lawmakers who led the letter effort, spoke at a live-streamed #NoSocialSecurityCuts event Tuesday that also featured remarks from advocates for people with disabilities.
Casey said that those in government should wake up each morning and ask themselves at least one fundamental question: "Will I spend today advancing the cause of justice or not?" This proposed rule change, he continued, "is wrong. It's a mistake. It is certainly not in the interest of justice, and it's certainly adverse to the interests of people with disabilities."
Brown, who described the Trump administration's proposal as "simply mean-spirited," referenced President Donald Trump's comments last week--while attending the World Economic Forum's annual summit for the global elite--about pushing for further cuts to social programs.
Trump's remarks at Davos were also highlighted by Rep. Brendan Boyle (D-Penn.), who joined the senators and activists speaking out Tuesday against the proposed rule change.
"It is wrong, it is cruel, and it is not in keeping with my vision and our vision of a just society," said Boyle.
"The administration is failing in a frontal attack, which would be passing legislation, so they're attempting an end run, using the rulemaking process and the powers of the executive to nip away and take kind of death by a thousand cuts of the Social Security program," the congressman added, "because that is the second act in a two-act plan to reduce the size of government and give away that money in tax cuts to the very wealthy."
Boyle attended the event on behalf of the more than 100 lawmakers in the House who have joined a separate letter he is leading to oppose the SSA rule, which is expected to be released in the coming days. The adminsitration's proposal also has been met with significant opposition from the public.
Over 114,000 people have submitted comments through a letter campaign sponsored by Social Security Works and other organizations opposed to the rule, and more than 10,000 have done so through a similar campaign by the Alliance for Retired Americans.
"This proposal is cruel and dangerous," Richard Fiesta, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, said in a statement Tuesday. "Social Security disability benefits are earned over years of hard work--just like retirement benefits. We should make it easier for people to claim the benefits they need and are eligible for, not harder."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.