To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.

×
Free Press Advocates Decry 'Unprecedented' and 'Unjustified' Restrictions on Reporter Access to Trump Impeachment Trial

Under rules proposed by the Senate Rules Committee, journalists on Capitol Hill may have restricted access to President Donald Trump's impeachment trial. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Free Press Advocates Decry 'Unprecedented' and 'Unjustified' Restrictions on Reporter Access to Trump Impeachment Trial

"Americans expect and deserve a fully transparent impeachment trial... For the Senate to produce anything less would be a show of GOP contempt for the American people."

Journalists, lawmakers, and free press advocates are condemning the Senate's proposed rules for reporters as President Donald Trump's impeachment trial gets underway--restrictions which critics say will limit in "unprecedented" ways the media's ability to cover the proceedings.

As Capitol Hill journalists learned this week of the proposed rules, many took to social media to express outrage.

"Pretty much an outrage," tweeted New York Times reporter Carl Hulse. "Either Senate Republican leadership has no interest in recording history or perhaps they just want to play down the coming events altogether."

The rules, proposed by the Sergeant-at-Arms and the Senate Rules Committee, stipulate that reporters would be confined to a single small pen on the second floor of the Senate during Trump's trial. During normal Senate business--and even major events--journalists have traditionally been permitted to approach senators in Capitol Hill hallways and outside the Senate chamber.

Restricting correspondents to a single area will significantly reduce their access to lawmakers during the historic proceedings, reporters said.

Journalists may also be subjected to additional security screening and their movement around the Capitol may be restricted.

"Every other occasion, including SOTUs, we have been able to balance the equities of lawmakers and media without metal detectors or reporter pens," tweeted Mike DeBonis, a congressional reporter for the Washington Post. "Completely unclear why this should be any different."

The Standing Committee of Correspondents, which represents and advocates for journalists on Capitol Hill, reportedly suggested several less restrictive rules to the Sergeant-at-Arms and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), chairman of the Rules Committee--but Sarah D. Wire, who leads the Standing Committee, said the proposals were flatly rejected.

The Standing Committee wrote to leaders including Blunt, Rules Committee Ranking Member Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday.

"Capitol Hill is one of the most accessible places in Washington, but the proposed restrictions exceed those put in place during the State of the Union, Inauguration Day, or even during the Clinton impeachment trial 20 years ago," reads the letter.

Journalists on Capitol HIll have the support of PEN America, the national freedom of expression organization.

The proposed rules will "establish unprecedented limitations on the Congressional press corps," the group said in a statement on Wednesday.

"Moments of national crisis require credible and consistent reporting. Instead, Capitol Police and the sergeant-at-arms are jeopardizing press freedom and the public's right to know," said Thomas O. Melia, the group's Washington director. "These measures would obstruct the work of journalists covering the Senate. They constitute an unacceptable effort to block the free flow of information at a time when that information is necessary to the functioning of our democracy."

"Officials should reject these types of inappropriate limitations," he added.

Klobuchar joined several senators on both sides of the aisle in decrying the proposed restrictions.

Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana called the proposed rules a "huge mistake."

As Common Dreams reported in 2017, Capitol Police and the Sergeant-at-Arms previously cracked down on reporters' access to protests on Capitol Hill as Republicans were ramping up their effort to repeal key provisions of the Affordable Care Act, with officers ordering at least one journalist to delete photos from his phone.

Common Cause called the Republican-led Senate leadership's proposed rules "completely unjustified."

"Americans expect and deserve a fully transparent impeachment trial that examines all the facts, utilizes all pertinent evidence, and hears from witnesses," said Karen Hobert Flynn, president of the group. "For the Senate to produce anything less would be a show of GOP contempt for our justice system, and it would be a show of GOP contempt for the American people."

Join Us: News for people demanding a better world


Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.

We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference.

Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
common causeimpeachmentjournalismmediatrumpismus senate

Journalists, lawmakers, and free press advocates are condemning the Senate's proposed rules for reporters as President Donald Trump's impeachment trial gets underway--restrictions which critics say will limit in "unprecedented" ways the media's ability to cover the proceedings.

As Capitol Hill journalists learned this week of the proposed rules, many took to social media to express outrage.

"Pretty much an outrage," tweeted New York Times reporter Carl Hulse. "Either Senate Republican leadership has no interest in recording history or perhaps they just want to play down the coming events altogether."

The rules, proposed by the Sergeant-at-Arms and the Senate Rules Committee, stipulate that reporters would be confined to a single small pen on the second floor of the Senate during Trump's trial. During normal Senate business--and even major events--journalists have traditionally been permitted to approach senators in Capitol Hill hallways and outside the Senate chamber.

Restricting correspondents to a single area will significantly reduce their access to lawmakers during the historic proceedings, reporters said.

Journalists may also be subjected to additional security screening and their movement around the Capitol may be restricted.

"Every other occasion, including SOTUs, we have been able to balance the equities of lawmakers and media without metal detectors or reporter pens," tweeted Mike DeBonis, a congressional reporter for the Washington Post. "Completely unclear why this should be any different."

The Standing Committee of Correspondents, which represents and advocates for journalists on Capitol Hill, reportedly suggested several less restrictive rules to the Sergeant-at-Arms and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), chairman of the Rules Committee--but Sarah D. Wire, who leads the Standing Committee, said the proposals were flatly rejected.

The Standing Committee wrote to leaders including Blunt, Rules Committee Ranking Member Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday.

"Capitol Hill is one of the most accessible places in Washington, but the proposed restrictions exceed those put in place during the State of the Union, Inauguration Day, or even during the Clinton impeachment trial 20 years ago," reads the letter.

Journalists on Capitol HIll have the support of PEN America, the national freedom of expression organization.

The proposed rules will "establish unprecedented limitations on the Congressional press corps," the group said in a statement on Wednesday.

"Moments of national crisis require credible and consistent reporting. Instead, Capitol Police and the sergeant-at-arms are jeopardizing press freedom and the public's right to know," said Thomas O. Melia, the group's Washington director. "These measures would obstruct the work of journalists covering the Senate. They constitute an unacceptable effort to block the free flow of information at a time when that information is necessary to the functioning of our democracy."

"Officials should reject these types of inappropriate limitations," he added.

Klobuchar joined several senators on both sides of the aisle in decrying the proposed restrictions.

Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana called the proposed rules a "huge mistake."

As Common Dreams reported in 2017, Capitol Police and the Sergeant-at-Arms previously cracked down on reporters' access to protests on Capitol Hill as Republicans were ramping up their effort to repeal key provisions of the Affordable Care Act, with officers ordering at least one journalist to delete photos from his phone.

Common Cause called the Republican-led Senate leadership's proposed rules "completely unjustified."

"Americans expect and deserve a fully transparent impeachment trial that examines all the facts, utilizes all pertinent evidence, and hears from witnesses," said Karen Hobert Flynn, president of the group. "For the Senate to produce anything less would be a show of GOP contempt for our justice system, and it would be a show of GOP contempt for the American people."

Journalists, lawmakers, and free press advocates are condemning the Senate's proposed rules for reporters as President Donald Trump's impeachment trial gets underway--restrictions which critics say will limit in "unprecedented" ways the media's ability to cover the proceedings.

As Capitol Hill journalists learned this week of the proposed rules, many took to social media to express outrage.

"Pretty much an outrage," tweeted New York Times reporter Carl Hulse. "Either Senate Republican leadership has no interest in recording history or perhaps they just want to play down the coming events altogether."

The rules, proposed by the Sergeant-at-Arms and the Senate Rules Committee, stipulate that reporters would be confined to a single small pen on the second floor of the Senate during Trump's trial. During normal Senate business--and even major events--journalists have traditionally been permitted to approach senators in Capitol Hill hallways and outside the Senate chamber.

Restricting correspondents to a single area will significantly reduce their access to lawmakers during the historic proceedings, reporters said.

Journalists may also be subjected to additional security screening and their movement around the Capitol may be restricted.

"Every other occasion, including SOTUs, we have been able to balance the equities of lawmakers and media without metal detectors or reporter pens," tweeted Mike DeBonis, a congressional reporter for the Washington Post. "Completely unclear why this should be any different."

The Standing Committee of Correspondents, which represents and advocates for journalists on Capitol Hill, reportedly suggested several less restrictive rules to the Sergeant-at-Arms and Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), chairman of the Rules Committee--but Sarah D. Wire, who leads the Standing Committee, said the proposals were flatly rejected.

The Standing Committee wrote to leaders including Blunt, Rules Committee Ranking Member Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) on Wednesday.

"Capitol Hill is one of the most accessible places in Washington, but the proposed restrictions exceed those put in place during the State of the Union, Inauguration Day, or even during the Clinton impeachment trial 20 years ago," reads the letter.

Journalists on Capitol HIll have the support of PEN America, the national freedom of expression organization.

The proposed rules will "establish unprecedented limitations on the Congressional press corps," the group said in a statement on Wednesday.

"Moments of national crisis require credible and consistent reporting. Instead, Capitol Police and the sergeant-at-arms are jeopardizing press freedom and the public's right to know," said Thomas O. Melia, the group's Washington director. "These measures would obstruct the work of journalists covering the Senate. They constitute an unacceptable effort to block the free flow of information at a time when that information is necessary to the functioning of our democracy."

"Officials should reject these types of inappropriate limitations," he added.

Klobuchar joined several senators on both sides of the aisle in decrying the proposed restrictions.

Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana called the proposed rules a "huge mistake."

As Common Dreams reported in 2017, Capitol Police and the Sergeant-at-Arms previously cracked down on reporters' access to protests on Capitol Hill as Republicans were ramping up their effort to repeal key provisions of the Affordable Care Act, with officers ordering at least one journalist to delete photos from his phone.

Common Cause called the Republican-led Senate leadership's proposed rules "completely unjustified."

"Americans expect and deserve a fully transparent impeachment trial that examines all the facts, utilizes all pertinent evidence, and hears from witnesses," said Karen Hobert Flynn, president of the group. "For the Senate to produce anything less would be a show of GOP contempt for our justice system, and it would be a show of GOP contempt for the American people."

common causeimpeachmentjournalismmediatrumpismus senate