SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) currently has Indivisible's top score on its 2020 scorecard. The group applauded the senator for her commitment to "Day One democracy reforms" and her progressive policy agenda. (Photo: Indivisible)
On Indivisible's 2020 Scorecard, Warren's Commitment to Democracy Reform and Sanders' Policy Platform Win High Marks
Sen. Elizabeth Warren won the highest overall grade on the scorecard, which may be updated as candidates make new commitments to enacting a progressive agenda.
Dec 10, 2019
Sen. Elizabeth Warren was ranked at the top of progressive group Indivisible's Democratic candidate scorecard on Wednesday with a score of 95% and garnered praise from the group for her commitment to enacting bold democracy reforms on Day One of her potential administration.
The Massachusetts Democrat has "both a bold progressive vision for our country and the day-one democracy agenda we need to make that vision a reality," Indivisible wrote.
The group scored the Democratic candidates in three areas:
- Policy Platform
- Day-One Democracy Agenda
- Building Grassroots Power
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was slightly behind Warren with an overall score of 89%, losing some points in the latter two categories. He was given the highest score in the Policy Platform category, with 97% vs. Warren's 94%.
"More than any other candidate, he has proposed the most progressive and transformative set of policies across key policy issues," Indivisible said of Sanders. "In particular, his proposals to combat climate change, to transform our immigration system, and to guarantee universal access to healthcare earned him full credit in those policy sections."
Sanders won perfect scores on his policy proposals for immigration, climate action, healthcare, and economic justice; Warren lost points on immigration for failing to commit to a moratorium on deportations.
Sanders lost points for not committing to ending the Senate filibuster as Warren has. Though the Vermont senator has proposed directing his vice president to help his policy proposals including Medicare for All to pass through the budget reconciliation process--a proposal which Vox called "arguably more radical than simply abolishing the filibuster"--Indivisible determined that allowing the filibuster to stand still "poses a significant barrier to enacting his legislative agenda."
While Sanders has built a coalition of working people--drawing the largest crowd so far in the key state of Iowa last month and becoming the only candidate to draw contributions from one million individual donors--the senator lost points in Indivisible's grassroots power category because he has endorsed only one progressive primary challenger in a House race thus far.
Warren scored a 97% on Building Grassroots Power for her endorsements of both Marie Newman and Jessica Cisneros and her commitment to building a coalition of members of Congress who will help pass her agenda.
Over the past several months, Indivisible distributed questionnaires to the Democratic candidates and asked them to sign its "We Are Indivisible" pledge.
Only candidates who signed the pledge--in which they promised to eventually support the 2020 Democratic nominee--were included in the scorecard, with entrepreneur Andrew Yang and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) among those who were left out of the grading.
The group pointed out that the scorecard is a living document, saying, "These scores will be updated as candidates make new commitments on the issues that matter to Indivisibles."
For example, Sanders' score could rise should he endorse Cisneros, who is challenging conservative Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar in Texas.
Aside from Sanders and Warren, the other two candidates who have consistently polled in the top four in recent weeks--South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg and former Vice President Joe Biden--scored 77% and under 50%, respectively, on Indivisible's questionnaire.
Buttigieg lost several points for holding high-dollar fundraisers, failing to commit to a funding reduction for immigration enforcement agencies, failing to support Medicare for All or a moratorium on fracking, not committing to repealing the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), and a number of other factors.
"A major reason for his overall low score is because he failed to firmly commit to many of the questions in the questionnaire and candidate interview," Indivisible said of the mayor.
Biden scored under 50% in almost all policy areas, with Indivisible saying, "While he supports policies that would make progress in most issue areas, he would not advance transformative change in any of them."
Indivisible co-founder Ezra Levin rejected the notion, pushed by many pundits in the primary season, that Biden is the "most electable candidate," considering his heavy reliance on the support of large donors rather than a grassroots movement and his lack of commitment to democracy reforms.
"I don't think Joe Biden is the most electable candidate," Levin told NPR. "I think he's among the least electable candidates. I think he is going to have a hard time mobilizing communities of color and young people to get out and vote for him. I think that that is going to be a danger if he becomes the nominee."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren was ranked at the top of progressive group Indivisible's Democratic candidate scorecard on Wednesday with a score of 95% and garnered praise from the group for her commitment to enacting bold democracy reforms on Day One of her potential administration.
The Massachusetts Democrat has "both a bold progressive vision for our country and the day-one democracy agenda we need to make that vision a reality," Indivisible wrote.
The group scored the Democratic candidates in three areas:
- Policy Platform
- Day-One Democracy Agenda
- Building Grassroots Power
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was slightly behind Warren with an overall score of 89%, losing some points in the latter two categories. He was given the highest score in the Policy Platform category, with 97% vs. Warren's 94%.
"More than any other candidate, he has proposed the most progressive and transformative set of policies across key policy issues," Indivisible said of Sanders. "In particular, his proposals to combat climate change, to transform our immigration system, and to guarantee universal access to healthcare earned him full credit in those policy sections."
Sanders won perfect scores on his policy proposals for immigration, climate action, healthcare, and economic justice; Warren lost points on immigration for failing to commit to a moratorium on deportations.
Sanders lost points for not committing to ending the Senate filibuster as Warren has. Though the Vermont senator has proposed directing his vice president to help his policy proposals including Medicare for All to pass through the budget reconciliation process--a proposal which Vox called "arguably more radical than simply abolishing the filibuster"--Indivisible determined that allowing the filibuster to stand still "poses a significant barrier to enacting his legislative agenda."
While Sanders has built a coalition of working people--drawing the largest crowd so far in the key state of Iowa last month and becoming the only candidate to draw contributions from one million individual donors--the senator lost points in Indivisible's grassroots power category because he has endorsed only one progressive primary challenger in a House race thus far.
Warren scored a 97% on Building Grassroots Power for her endorsements of both Marie Newman and Jessica Cisneros and her commitment to building a coalition of members of Congress who will help pass her agenda.
Over the past several months, Indivisible distributed questionnaires to the Democratic candidates and asked them to sign its "We Are Indivisible" pledge.
Only candidates who signed the pledge--in which they promised to eventually support the 2020 Democratic nominee--were included in the scorecard, with entrepreneur Andrew Yang and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) among those who were left out of the grading.
The group pointed out that the scorecard is a living document, saying, "These scores will be updated as candidates make new commitments on the issues that matter to Indivisibles."
For example, Sanders' score could rise should he endorse Cisneros, who is challenging conservative Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar in Texas.
Aside from Sanders and Warren, the other two candidates who have consistently polled in the top four in recent weeks--South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg and former Vice President Joe Biden--scored 77% and under 50%, respectively, on Indivisible's questionnaire.
Buttigieg lost several points for holding high-dollar fundraisers, failing to commit to a funding reduction for immigration enforcement agencies, failing to support Medicare for All or a moratorium on fracking, not committing to repealing the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), and a number of other factors.
"A major reason for his overall low score is because he failed to firmly commit to many of the questions in the questionnaire and candidate interview," Indivisible said of the mayor.
Biden scored under 50% in almost all policy areas, with Indivisible saying, "While he supports policies that would make progress in most issue areas, he would not advance transformative change in any of them."
Indivisible co-founder Ezra Levin rejected the notion, pushed by many pundits in the primary season, that Biden is the "most electable candidate," considering his heavy reliance on the support of large donors rather than a grassroots movement and his lack of commitment to democracy reforms.
"I don't think Joe Biden is the most electable candidate," Levin told NPR. "I think he's among the least electable candidates. I think he is going to have a hard time mobilizing communities of color and young people to get out and vote for him. I think that that is going to be a danger if he becomes the nominee."
Sen. Elizabeth Warren was ranked at the top of progressive group Indivisible's Democratic candidate scorecard on Wednesday with a score of 95% and garnered praise from the group for her commitment to enacting bold democracy reforms on Day One of her potential administration.
The Massachusetts Democrat has "both a bold progressive vision for our country and the day-one democracy agenda we need to make that vision a reality," Indivisible wrote.
The group scored the Democratic candidates in three areas:
- Policy Platform
- Day-One Democracy Agenda
- Building Grassroots Power
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) was slightly behind Warren with an overall score of 89%, losing some points in the latter two categories. He was given the highest score in the Policy Platform category, with 97% vs. Warren's 94%.
"More than any other candidate, he has proposed the most progressive and transformative set of policies across key policy issues," Indivisible said of Sanders. "In particular, his proposals to combat climate change, to transform our immigration system, and to guarantee universal access to healthcare earned him full credit in those policy sections."
Sanders won perfect scores on his policy proposals for immigration, climate action, healthcare, and economic justice; Warren lost points on immigration for failing to commit to a moratorium on deportations.
Sanders lost points for not committing to ending the Senate filibuster as Warren has. Though the Vermont senator has proposed directing his vice president to help his policy proposals including Medicare for All to pass through the budget reconciliation process--a proposal which Vox called "arguably more radical than simply abolishing the filibuster"--Indivisible determined that allowing the filibuster to stand still "poses a significant barrier to enacting his legislative agenda."
While Sanders has built a coalition of working people--drawing the largest crowd so far in the key state of Iowa last month and becoming the only candidate to draw contributions from one million individual donors--the senator lost points in Indivisible's grassroots power category because he has endorsed only one progressive primary challenger in a House race thus far.
Warren scored a 97% on Building Grassroots Power for her endorsements of both Marie Newman and Jessica Cisneros and her commitment to building a coalition of members of Congress who will help pass her agenda.
Over the past several months, Indivisible distributed questionnaires to the Democratic candidates and asked them to sign its "We Are Indivisible" pledge.
Only candidates who signed the pledge--in which they promised to eventually support the 2020 Democratic nominee--were included in the scorecard, with entrepreneur Andrew Yang and Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) among those who were left out of the grading.
The group pointed out that the scorecard is a living document, saying, "These scores will be updated as candidates make new commitments on the issues that matter to Indivisibles."
For example, Sanders' score could rise should he endorse Cisneros, who is challenging conservative Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar in Texas.
Aside from Sanders and Warren, the other two candidates who have consistently polled in the top four in recent weeks--South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg and former Vice President Joe Biden--scored 77% and under 50%, respectively, on Indivisible's questionnaire.
Buttigieg lost several points for holding high-dollar fundraisers, failing to commit to a funding reduction for immigration enforcement agencies, failing to support Medicare for All or a moratorium on fracking, not committing to repealing the Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), and a number of other factors.
"A major reason for his overall low score is because he failed to firmly commit to many of the questions in the questionnaire and candidate interview," Indivisible said of the mayor.
Biden scored under 50% in almost all policy areas, with Indivisible saying, "While he supports policies that would make progress in most issue areas, he would not advance transformative change in any of them."
Indivisible co-founder Ezra Levin rejected the notion, pushed by many pundits in the primary season, that Biden is the "most electable candidate," considering his heavy reliance on the support of large donors rather than a grassroots movement and his lack of commitment to democracy reforms.
"I don't think Joe Biden is the most electable candidate," Levin told NPR. "I think he's among the least electable candidates. I think he is going to have a hard time mobilizing communities of color and young people to get out and vote for him. I think that that is going to be a danger if he becomes the nominee."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.