Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Dear Common Dreams Readers:
Corporations and billionaires have their own media. Shouldn't we? When you “follow the money” that funds our independent journalism, it all leads back to this: people like you. Our supporters are what allows us to produce journalism in the public interest that is beholden only to people, our planet, and the common good. Please support our Mid-Year Campaign so that we always have a newsroom for the people that is funded by the people. Thank you for your support. --Jon Queally, managing editor

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

President Donald Trump speaks at a meeting with business leaders on tax reform at the White House in Washington, D.C. on October 31, 2017. (Photo: Nicholas Kamm/AFP/Getty Images)

Calling Trump's Claim That He Is Above the Law 'Repugnant,' Federal Judge Orders Release of President's Tax Returns

"This is great news for anyone who cares about holding Donald Trump accountable."

Julia Conley

A federal judge in New York Monday expressed disgust at President Donald Trump's argument that as president he is immune from criminal investigations, ruling that such a claim does not shield Trump from being required to publicize his tax returns.

Judge Victor Marrero said that Manhattan prosecutors can move forward with their subpoena for eight years of Trump's personal and corporate tax returns as part of a criminal investigation into the president's reimbursement of his former lawyer, Michael Cohen, for payments to two women in the run-up to the 2016 election.

Trump's argument that he is above the law is "repugnant to the nation's governmental structure and constitutional values," Marrero said.

"This court cannot endorse such a categorical and limitless assertion of presidential immunity from judicial process as being countenanced by the nation's constitutional plan," wrote Marrero. "The expansive notion of constitutional immunity invoked here to shield the president from judicial process would constitute an overreach of executive power."

Marrero's rejection of the president's claim, in addition to the ruling itself, garnered attention on social media.

"Someday I hope we scratch our heads at the claims of presidential immunity as some of the weirdest monarchical thinking that had somehow crept into an American system of law," tweeted progressive law professor Zephyr Teachout.

The president has spent much of his nearly three years in office shielding his tax returns from public view, and went against a four-decade precedent of releasing his tax information while running for office, as other candidates have since 1974 in the name of transparency.

Trump's refusal to publicize his financial data has raised questions, particularly amid reports that the president's longtime creditor, Deutsche Bank, was raided in connection with the Panama Papers money laundering probe and that the president engaged in suspect tax schemes for years before beginning his political career.

The federal ruling in New York came days after reporting revealed that a whistleblower alleged interference with Trump's or Vice President Mike Pence's tax returns at the IRS, which audits both officials' tax information annually.

"Obtaining Trump's tax returns remains vital to determining whether he has manipulated our tax code as much as he has sought to manipulate our democracy," Rep. Lloyd Doggett (D-Texas) said in a statement Friday.

Trump's lawyers said Monday they would appeal Marrero's ruling, and the president won a temporary stay of the decision shortly after it was handed down.

The temporary stay expires on Wednesday, and the president's accounting firm, Mazars USA, has been ordered to begin delivering Trump tax returns to the Manhattan district attorney's office starting at 4:00 pm that day.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.


Abortion Rights Defenders Applaud Judge's Block on Utah 'Trigger Ban'

"Today is a win, but it is only the first step in what will undoubtedly be a long and difficult fight," said one pro-choice advocate.

Brett Wilkins ·

Scores Feared Dead and Wounded as Russian Missiles Hit Ukraine Shopping Center

"People just burned alive," said Ukraine's interior minister, while the head of the Poltava region stated that "it is too early to talk about the final number of the killed."

Brett Wilkins ·

Biodiversity Risks Could Persist for Decades After Global Temperature Peak

One study co-author said the findings "should act as a wake-up call that delaying emissions cuts will mean a temperature overshoot that comes at an astronomical cost to nature and humans that unproven negative emission technologies cannot simply reverse."

Jessica Corbett ·

Amnesty Report Demands Biden Take Action to End Death Penalty

"The world is waiting for the USA to do what almost 100 countries have achieved during this past half-century—total abolition of the death penalty," said the group.

Julia Conley ·

Pointing to 'Recently Obtained Evidence,' Jan. 6 Panel Calls Surprise Tuesday Hearing

The announcement came less than a week after the House panel delayed new hearings until next month, citing a "deluge" of fresh evidence.

Common Dreams staff ·

Common Dreams Logo