SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Activists rally against the GOP healthcare plan outside of the Metropolitan Republican Club, July 5, 2017 in New York City. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Progressives responded with a mixture of alarm and ridicule to news that President Donald Trump is planning later this week to sign an executive order to "protect" Medicare, a government-run program, from "socialist destruction."
The Washington Post reported that the executive order, which Trump is set to unveil Thursday during a trip to Florida, is part of a concerted attack on the push for Medicare for All, a proposal championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and backed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
\u201cYes, only Trump save MEDICARE, a government-run health care program, from socialism\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1569782982
\u201cNot only did Trump\u2019s own budget make deep cuts to Medicare, but can someone explain to me how a socialist program can be saved from socialism?\u201d— Brian Tyler Cohen (@Brian Tyler Cohen) 1569783351
Observers said Trump's planned executive order is reminiscent of the infamous "keep your government hands off my Medicare" line that was shouted at a Republican lawmaker during a town hall in 2009, in the heat of the fight over the Affordable Care Act.
"I understand why people like Trump and [Vice President Joe] Biden try to scare old people about Medicare for All. Scaring old people is time-tested!" HuffPost reporter Jeffrey Young tweeted Sunday. "But the idea that giving government healthcare to everyone somehow means taking it from people who already have government healthcare is just absurd."
\u201cKEEP THE GOVERNMENT'S HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE!!1!\u201d— Jeffrey Young (@Jeffrey Young) 1569794994
Others recounted Republicans' vehement opposition to the creation of Medicare in response to Trump's fearmongering executive order:
\u201cRepublicans ca. 1965: MEDICARE IS SOCIALISM!!! It must be stopped.\n\nRepublicans ca. 2019: Only we can protect your Medicare from the evil socialists who want to take it away from you.\u201d— Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social (@Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social) 1569786530
\u201cFor those unfamiliar with the 1960s anti-Medicare argument, here it is put mellifluously by Ronald Reagan. https://t.co/u4ZG8mv95F\u201d— Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social (@Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social) 1569786530
While the full details of the executive order have not yet been released to the public, the Post reported that the order could call for further privatization of Medicare by expanding "plans offered through Medicare Advantage."
Progressives warned that, as with Republican calls to "save" Social Security, Trump's executive order could mean attempted cuts to the crucial program, which covers tens of millions of elderly Americans and people with disabilities.
"Donald Trump plans to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid," tweeted People for Bernie.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Progressives responded with a mixture of alarm and ridicule to news that President Donald Trump is planning later this week to sign an executive order to "protect" Medicare, a government-run program, from "socialist destruction."
The Washington Post reported that the executive order, which Trump is set to unveil Thursday during a trip to Florida, is part of a concerted attack on the push for Medicare for All, a proposal championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and backed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
\u201cYes, only Trump save MEDICARE, a government-run health care program, from socialism\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1569782982
\u201cNot only did Trump\u2019s own budget make deep cuts to Medicare, but can someone explain to me how a socialist program can be saved from socialism?\u201d— Brian Tyler Cohen (@Brian Tyler Cohen) 1569783351
Observers said Trump's planned executive order is reminiscent of the infamous "keep your government hands off my Medicare" line that was shouted at a Republican lawmaker during a town hall in 2009, in the heat of the fight over the Affordable Care Act.
"I understand why people like Trump and [Vice President Joe] Biden try to scare old people about Medicare for All. Scaring old people is time-tested!" HuffPost reporter Jeffrey Young tweeted Sunday. "But the idea that giving government healthcare to everyone somehow means taking it from people who already have government healthcare is just absurd."
\u201cKEEP THE GOVERNMENT'S HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE!!1!\u201d— Jeffrey Young (@Jeffrey Young) 1569794994
Others recounted Republicans' vehement opposition to the creation of Medicare in response to Trump's fearmongering executive order:
\u201cRepublicans ca. 1965: MEDICARE IS SOCIALISM!!! It must be stopped.\n\nRepublicans ca. 2019: Only we can protect your Medicare from the evil socialists who want to take it away from you.\u201d— Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social (@Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social) 1569786530
\u201cFor those unfamiliar with the 1960s anti-Medicare argument, here it is put mellifluously by Ronald Reagan. https://t.co/u4ZG8mv95F\u201d— Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social (@Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social) 1569786530
While the full details of the executive order have not yet been released to the public, the Post reported that the order could call for further privatization of Medicare by expanding "plans offered through Medicare Advantage."
Progressives warned that, as with Republican calls to "save" Social Security, Trump's executive order could mean attempted cuts to the crucial program, which covers tens of millions of elderly Americans and people with disabilities.
"Donald Trump plans to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid," tweeted People for Bernie.
Progressives responded with a mixture of alarm and ridicule to news that President Donald Trump is planning later this week to sign an executive order to "protect" Medicare, a government-run program, from "socialist destruction."
The Washington Post reported that the executive order, which Trump is set to unveil Thursday during a trip to Florida, is part of a concerted attack on the push for Medicare for All, a proposal championed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and backed by Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.).
\u201cYes, only Trump save MEDICARE, a government-run health care program, from socialism\u201d— Judd Legum (@Judd Legum) 1569782982
\u201cNot only did Trump\u2019s own budget make deep cuts to Medicare, but can someone explain to me how a socialist program can be saved from socialism?\u201d— Brian Tyler Cohen (@Brian Tyler Cohen) 1569783351
Observers said Trump's planned executive order is reminiscent of the infamous "keep your government hands off my Medicare" line that was shouted at a Republican lawmaker during a town hall in 2009, in the heat of the fight over the Affordable Care Act.
"I understand why people like Trump and [Vice President Joe] Biden try to scare old people about Medicare for All. Scaring old people is time-tested!" HuffPost reporter Jeffrey Young tweeted Sunday. "But the idea that giving government healthcare to everyone somehow means taking it from people who already have government healthcare is just absurd."
\u201cKEEP THE GOVERNMENT'S HANDS OFF MY MEDICARE!!1!\u201d— Jeffrey Young (@Jeffrey Young) 1569794994
Others recounted Republicans' vehement opposition to the creation of Medicare in response to Trump's fearmongering executive order:
\u201cRepublicans ca. 1965: MEDICARE IS SOCIALISM!!! It must be stopped.\n\nRepublicans ca. 2019: Only we can protect your Medicare from the evil socialists who want to take it away from you.\u201d— Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social (@Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social) 1569786530
\u201cFor those unfamiliar with the 1960s anti-Medicare argument, here it is put mellifluously by Ronald Reagan. https://t.co/u4ZG8mv95F\u201d— Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social (@Seth Cotlar also at sethcotlar@mastodon.social) 1569786530
While the full details of the executive order have not yet been released to the public, the Post reported that the order could call for further privatization of Medicare by expanding "plans offered through Medicare Advantage."
Progressives warned that, as with Republican calls to "save" Social Security, Trump's executive order could mean attempted cuts to the crucial program, which covers tens of millions of elderly Americans and people with disabilities.
"Donald Trump plans to cut Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid," tweeted People for Bernie.