SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A small group of activists rally against the Republican healthcare agenda outside of the Metropolitan Republican Club, July 5, 2017 in New York City. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Outrage as Tennessee Moves Forward With Trump-Favored Proposal to Slash Medicaid
The plan, if enacted, threatens to unleash a "radical change to the medical safety net for the nation's poorest citizens."
Sep 18, 2019
A social justice advocacy group shot back on Tuesday after Tennessee unveiled a plan to switch the state's Medicaid program into a block grant program.
"A block grant is a Medicaid cut in disguise, and Tennessee should not be fooled," said the Tennessee Justice Center.
The state released details of the proposal (pdf) Tuesday.
Any overhaul of TennCare would need the approval of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The Trump administration--to the ire of healthcare and anti-poverty advocates--has been gunning for states to make such a switch.
"If Tennessee garners federal approval on a policy to cut Medicaid funds--and survives the subsequent lawsuits it'd surely face--it would encourage other conservative states to do the same," reported Axios. "This would be a radical change to the medical safety net for the nation's poorest citizens."
As The Associated Press reported, "Currently, the federal government pays a percentage of each state's Medicaid costs, no matter how much they rise in any given year. For Tennessee, that means receiving approximately $7.5 billion in federal money for its $12.1 billion Medicaid program, or 65 percent."
CNN laid out how things could change for the state under the proposal:
The proposal from Tennessee--which has not expanded Medicaid--doesn't follow the typical block-grant idea, which would offer a lump sum payment to a state. It's seeking to exclude expenses related to outpatient prescription drugs, home- and community-based long-term care, uncompensated care payments to hospitals and several other costs. These would continue to be funded under the current formula.
The block grant funding would rise if enrollment in Tennessee's program, called TennCare, increases in the future--addressing a major concern that the safety net couldn't expand in times of economic downturns. Plus, the annual increase in funding would be based on Congressional Budget Office projections for Medicaid growth, which is more generous than inflation.
Another provision: If the state spends less than the block grant amount, it gets to keep 50 percent of the federal share of those savings.
Though it may differ from a typical block grant plan, critics say there's still plenty of reason for concern.
Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute's Center for Children and Families (DCCF), outlined some of the concerns in a Twitter thread:
Edwin Park, a research professor with CCF, added his concerns:
Following reports in January that the Trump administration was moving to make it easier for states to switch to block grants for Medicaid, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, said that CMS had no authority to make those change--a point he reiterated on Wednesday.
"This is illegal," tweeted Pallone, "and the Trump Administration does not have the authority to do this."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A social justice advocacy group shot back on Tuesday after Tennessee unveiled a plan to switch the state's Medicaid program into a block grant program.
"A block grant is a Medicaid cut in disguise, and Tennessee should not be fooled," said the Tennessee Justice Center.
The state released details of the proposal (pdf) Tuesday.
Any overhaul of TennCare would need the approval of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The Trump administration--to the ire of healthcare and anti-poverty advocates--has been gunning for states to make such a switch.
"If Tennessee garners federal approval on a policy to cut Medicaid funds--and survives the subsequent lawsuits it'd surely face--it would encourage other conservative states to do the same," reported Axios. "This would be a radical change to the medical safety net for the nation's poorest citizens."
As The Associated Press reported, "Currently, the federal government pays a percentage of each state's Medicaid costs, no matter how much they rise in any given year. For Tennessee, that means receiving approximately $7.5 billion in federal money for its $12.1 billion Medicaid program, or 65 percent."
CNN laid out how things could change for the state under the proposal:
The proposal from Tennessee--which has not expanded Medicaid--doesn't follow the typical block-grant idea, which would offer a lump sum payment to a state. It's seeking to exclude expenses related to outpatient prescription drugs, home- and community-based long-term care, uncompensated care payments to hospitals and several other costs. These would continue to be funded under the current formula.
The block grant funding would rise if enrollment in Tennessee's program, called TennCare, increases in the future--addressing a major concern that the safety net couldn't expand in times of economic downturns. Plus, the annual increase in funding would be based on Congressional Budget Office projections for Medicaid growth, which is more generous than inflation.
Another provision: If the state spends less than the block grant amount, it gets to keep 50 percent of the federal share of those savings.
Though it may differ from a typical block grant plan, critics say there's still plenty of reason for concern.
Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute's Center for Children and Families (DCCF), outlined some of the concerns in a Twitter thread:
Edwin Park, a research professor with CCF, added his concerns:
Following reports in January that the Trump administration was moving to make it easier for states to switch to block grants for Medicaid, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, said that CMS had no authority to make those change--a point he reiterated on Wednesday.
"This is illegal," tweeted Pallone, "and the Trump Administration does not have the authority to do this."
A social justice advocacy group shot back on Tuesday after Tennessee unveiled a plan to switch the state's Medicaid program into a block grant program.
"A block grant is a Medicaid cut in disguise, and Tennessee should not be fooled," said the Tennessee Justice Center.
The state released details of the proposal (pdf) Tuesday.
Any overhaul of TennCare would need the approval of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The Trump administration--to the ire of healthcare and anti-poverty advocates--has been gunning for states to make such a switch.
"If Tennessee garners federal approval on a policy to cut Medicaid funds--and survives the subsequent lawsuits it'd surely face--it would encourage other conservative states to do the same," reported Axios. "This would be a radical change to the medical safety net for the nation's poorest citizens."
As The Associated Press reported, "Currently, the federal government pays a percentage of each state's Medicaid costs, no matter how much they rise in any given year. For Tennessee, that means receiving approximately $7.5 billion in federal money for its $12.1 billion Medicaid program, or 65 percent."
CNN laid out how things could change for the state under the proposal:
The proposal from Tennessee--which has not expanded Medicaid--doesn't follow the typical block-grant idea, which would offer a lump sum payment to a state. It's seeking to exclude expenses related to outpatient prescription drugs, home- and community-based long-term care, uncompensated care payments to hospitals and several other costs. These would continue to be funded under the current formula.
The block grant funding would rise if enrollment in Tennessee's program, called TennCare, increases in the future--addressing a major concern that the safety net couldn't expand in times of economic downturns. Plus, the annual increase in funding would be based on Congressional Budget Office projections for Medicaid growth, which is more generous than inflation.
Another provision: If the state spends less than the block grant amount, it gets to keep 50 percent of the federal share of those savings.
Though it may differ from a typical block grant plan, critics say there's still plenty of reason for concern.
Joan Alker, executive director of the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute's Center for Children and Families (DCCF), outlined some of the concerns in a Twitter thread:
Edwin Park, a research professor with CCF, added his concerns:
Following reports in January that the Trump administration was moving to make it easier for states to switch to block grants for Medicaid, Rep. Frank Pallone (D-N.J.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over Medicaid, said that CMS had no authority to make those change--a point he reiterated on Wednesday.
"This is illegal," tweeted Pallone, "and the Trump Administration does not have the authority to do this."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.