Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Former national security advisor John Bolton listens to President Donald Trump talk to reporters during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington on Feb. 12.

Former national security advisor John Bolton listens to President Donald Trump talk to reporters during a cabinet meeting at the White House in Washington on Feb. 12. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Progressives 'Overjoyed' as John Bolton Leaves White House

"Best news of this past few weeks, if not longer!!!!"

Eoin Higgins

This is an updating story

John Bolton, the fiery nationalist who served as President Donald Trump's national security advisor, was fired Tuesday due to disagreements over Iran, North Korea, and Afghanistan. 

In a statement, the Council on Islamic American Relations celebrated the decision and said the group hoped for a more reasoned and rational replacement. 

"CAIR always welcomes the firing of notorious Islamophobic hate mongers like John Bolton, a man who has strong ties to anti-Muslim extremists and organizations," the group said. "Let's hope Trump's next National Security Adviser isn't a white supremacist or anti-Muslim bigot."

The dismissal opens the door for peace, National Iranian American Council president Jamal Abdi said in a statement.

"The timing of this move is fortuitous given recent French efforts to facilitate dialogue between the U.S. and Iran," said Abdi. "Bolton was a major obstacle to any resumption of diplomacy and, now that he has been dismissed, the Trump administration should take proactive steps to enable dialogue and a diplomatic resolution with Iran."

Bolton, a notorious warhawk whose extreme views made him virtually unconfirmable in any position in the Trump administration, was appointed by the president on April 9, 2018. Before serving in the Trump administration, Bolton was then-President George W. Bush administration's representative to the U.N.—a position he got through recess appointment as, again, he would not have been confirmed by the Senate due to his views.  

As ACLU Human Rights Project director Jamil Dakwar pointed out in a statement, Bolton's extreme views weren't an issue before now. 

"John Bolton threatened International Criminal Court judges and prosecutors for investigating the United States' war crimes in Afghanistan," said Dakwar. "He celebrated when victims of torture were denied the opportunity to hold their torturers accountable. He abdicated on our country's responsibility to its international human rights commitments. None of this was apparently disagreeable enough to the president."

According to The New York Times, Bolton had become increasingly sidelined in the administration:

His departure comes as Mr. Trump is pursuing diplomatic openings with two of the United States' most intractable enemies, efforts that have troubled hard-liners in the administration, like Mr. Bolton, who view North Korea and Iran as profoundly untrustworthy.

The president made the announcement Tuesday via his Twitter account. 

"I informed John Bolton last night that his services are no longer needed at the White House," Trump tweeted. "I disagreed strongly with many of his suggestions, as did others in the administration."

Yet Bolton, in a tweet, said that he offered to resign, a point the former official repeated in texts to news anchors covering the unfolding drama. 

"I offered to resign last night," Bolton tweeted, "and President Trump said, 'Let's talk about it tomorrow.'"

Bolton reaffirmed that version of events in a text to Fox News host Brian Kilmeade. 

No matter how it happened, the news that the hawkish Bolton was out of the White House and away from the president's ear was welcomed by anti-war advocates. 

"I'm overjoyed," tweeted CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin. 

 Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft co-founder Trita Parsi rejoiced in the announcement, tweeting that the "chance of diplomacy went up" in the wake of Bolton's firing. 

"Best news of this past few weeks, if not longer!!!!" said Parsi. 

Paul Kawika Martin, the senior director for policy and political affairs at Peace Action, said that the choice to fire Bolton was one of the few Trump decisions that were acceptable. 

"There's a few decisions of Trump's that I agree with: diplomacy with NorthKorea, end the Afghanistan War, and there's no place for someone like John Bolton anywhere near a president," said Martin.

Some Twitter users, like @UweBollocks, opined on the internal White House drama that could have precipitated Bolton's dismissal. 

"Just keep thinking of Trump telling Bolton to shave his sideburns until he finally had to let him go," @UweBollocks tweeted.

The Young Turks reporter Emma Vigeland imagined the scene as Bolton left 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. 

"John Bolton wipes tears out of his matted mustache, lovingly stroking the framed illustration of dead Iranians he kept in his office as he packs it away into a singular cardboard filing box," Vigeland said.

While Bolton's future is unclear, a number of cynical observers made the prediction that the longtime right-wing advocate would continue to fail upward. 

"Can't wait for John Bolton's transition to cable and inevitable book deal," said journalist Walker Bragman. 

That was a point echoed by Daily Beast editor-in-chief Noah Shachtman. In a tweet, Shachtman referred to the impulse by the country's so-called "liberal" cable news network to feature anyone on the right who disagrees with the president. 

"Four words," said Shachtman. "MSNBC contributor John Bolton."

Even if he doesn't make it on as a contributor, Splinter deputy editor Jack Mirkinson said, Bolton will likely be the subject of positive coverage at the channel going forward.

"Someone on 'Morning Joe' will be pushing for Bolton to primary Trump by morning," said Mirkinson. 

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

New Legal Campaign Aims to Protect People and Nature From Polluters' 'Irreparable Damage'

"States must listen to communities' demands to recognize the human right to a healthy environment and better regulate businesses with respect to the impacts of their operations."

Jessica Corbett ·

'You Tell Me What We Should Cut': Sanders Not Budging on $3.5 Trillion

"Poll after poll tells me, and tells you, that what we are trying to do is enormously popular."

Jake Johnson ·

Civil Rights Leaders Decry Senate's Failure to Pass Police Reform Bill

"We will continue to fight and advocate for legislation worthy of George Floyd's name," vowed the heads of seven advocacy groups.

Brett Wilkins ·

Biden Set to Admit Even Fewer Refugees Than Trump's Record Low

The "paltry" number of those admitted so far would be well below the 62,500 ceiling President Joe Biden had set for the current fiscal year.

Andrea Germanos ·

In 'Landmark' Decision, EPA Finalizes Rule Cutting Use of Super-Pollutant HFCs

The regulation will drastically curb the use of "the most potent super-pollutants known to mankind at the moment," one climate campaigner said.

Julia Conley ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo