SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"It's a little bit sad," said Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, "the EPA is the biggest cheerleader and defender of glyphosate." (Photo: AFP/Getty Images)
Playing Role of Pesticide 'Cheerleader,' EPA Rebukes Calif. With Ban on Warning Labels for Roundup
"It's the Environmental Protection Agency, not the pesticide protection agency."
Aug 12, 2019
President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency was accused of being a pesticide "cheerleader" last week after the agency said it would not approval labels that say that glyphosate--the active ingredient in Roundup and other weedkillers--is known to cause cancer.
In a statement released Thursday announcing the move, the EPA dug in on its assertion that glyphosate does not cause cancer, though critics have said that is "an industry-friendly conclusion that's simply not based on the best available science."
The new guidance takes aim at California's 2017 move, in adherence with its Proposition 65, to add glyphosate to its list of chemicals known to cause cancer and require warning labels. The state cited the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer 2015 assessment that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans."
The EPA, however, said those labels provided consumers with false information.
"We will not allow California's flawed program to dictate federal policy," said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler in the statement.
The EPA also sent a letter to manufactures on Aug. 7 saying that "pesticide products bearing the Proposition 65 warning statement due to the presence of glyphosate are misbranded" under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
The letter, signed by Michael Goodis, head of EPA's registration division in its Office of Pesticide Programs, said EPA would not approve labeling with that warning, and that "EPA requests the submission of draft amended labeling that removes such language within ninety days of the date of this letter."
Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, suggested the EPA wasn't living up to its own name.
"It's a little bit sad the EPA is the biggest cheerleader and defender of glyphosate," Hartl told The Associated Press. "It's the Environmental Protection Agency, not the pesticide protection agency."
California and the IARC weren't alone in seeing a link between glyphosate and cancer.
Three U.S. juries have found Roundup responsible for plaintiffs' cancers, ordering Monsanto, which was acquired by the German pharmaceutical giant Bayer last year, to pay out tens of millions of dollars to victims.
Legal battles continue for the company. It's appealing the verdicts, but thousands of other people are suing the company for similar damages.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency was accused of being a pesticide "cheerleader" last week after the agency said it would not approval labels that say that glyphosate--the active ingredient in Roundup and other weedkillers--is known to cause cancer.
In a statement released Thursday announcing the move, the EPA dug in on its assertion that glyphosate does not cause cancer, though critics have said that is "an industry-friendly conclusion that's simply not based on the best available science."
The new guidance takes aim at California's 2017 move, in adherence with its Proposition 65, to add glyphosate to its list of chemicals known to cause cancer and require warning labels. The state cited the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer 2015 assessment that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans."
The EPA, however, said those labels provided consumers with false information.
"We will not allow California's flawed program to dictate federal policy," said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler in the statement.
The EPA also sent a letter to manufactures on Aug. 7 saying that "pesticide products bearing the Proposition 65 warning statement due to the presence of glyphosate are misbranded" under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
The letter, signed by Michael Goodis, head of EPA's registration division in its Office of Pesticide Programs, said EPA would not approve labeling with that warning, and that "EPA requests the submission of draft amended labeling that removes such language within ninety days of the date of this letter."
Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, suggested the EPA wasn't living up to its own name.
"It's a little bit sad the EPA is the biggest cheerleader and defender of glyphosate," Hartl told The Associated Press. "It's the Environmental Protection Agency, not the pesticide protection agency."
California and the IARC weren't alone in seeing a link between glyphosate and cancer.
Three U.S. juries have found Roundup responsible for plaintiffs' cancers, ordering Monsanto, which was acquired by the German pharmaceutical giant Bayer last year, to pay out tens of millions of dollars to victims.
Legal battles continue for the company. It's appealing the verdicts, but thousands of other people are suing the company for similar damages.
President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency was accused of being a pesticide "cheerleader" last week after the agency said it would not approval labels that say that glyphosate--the active ingredient in Roundup and other weedkillers--is known to cause cancer.
In a statement released Thursday announcing the move, the EPA dug in on its assertion that glyphosate does not cause cancer, though critics have said that is "an industry-friendly conclusion that's simply not based on the best available science."
The new guidance takes aim at California's 2017 move, in adherence with its Proposition 65, to add glyphosate to its list of chemicals known to cause cancer and require warning labels. The state cited the World Health Organization's International Agency for Research on Cancer 2015 assessment that glyphosate is "probably carcinogenic to humans."
The EPA, however, said those labels provided consumers with false information.
"We will not allow California's flawed program to dictate federal policy," said EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler in the statement.
The EPA also sent a letter to manufactures on Aug. 7 saying that "pesticide products bearing the Proposition 65 warning statement due to the presence of glyphosate are misbranded" under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA).
The letter, signed by Michael Goodis, head of EPA's registration division in its Office of Pesticide Programs, said EPA would not approve labeling with that warning, and that "EPA requests the submission of draft amended labeling that removes such language within ninety days of the date of this letter."
Brett Hartl, government affairs director for the Center for Biological Diversity, suggested the EPA wasn't living up to its own name.
"It's a little bit sad the EPA is the biggest cheerleader and defender of glyphosate," Hartl told The Associated Press. "It's the Environmental Protection Agency, not the pesticide protection agency."
California and the IARC weren't alone in seeing a link between glyphosate and cancer.
Three U.S. juries have found Roundup responsible for plaintiffs' cancers, ordering Monsanto, which was acquired by the German pharmaceutical giant Bayer last year, to pay out tens of millions of dollars to victims.
Legal battles continue for the company. It's appealing the verdicts, but thousands of other people are suing the company for similar damages.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.