SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) at Netroots Nation convention in Philadelphia on July 13, 2019. (Photo: Bastiaan Slabbers/NurPhoto via Getty Images)
'Groundbreaking': Rep. Ilhan Omar Praised for New Resolution Affirming Right to Engage in Boycotts
Minnesota Democrat and co-sponsors, says Jewish Voice for Peace, have shown "unwavering support for human rights, free speech, and the fight for social justice—everywhere"
Jul 17, 2019
Rep. Ilhan Omar drew praise for introducing a resolution on Wednesday affirming the use of boycotts as constitutionally-protected free speech and a tactic for effecting social change.
"This is HISTORIC!" tweeted antiwar group CodePink.
Co-sponsored by Democratic Reps. Rashida Tlaib (Mich.) and John Lewis (Ga.), H.R. 496 says that "governments and nongovernmental organizations alike have sought to criminalize, stigmatize, and delegitimize the use of boycotts in an attempt to stifle constitutionally protected political expression."
Per the text, the resolution:
- affirms that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts in pursuit of civil and human rights at home and abroad, as protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution;
- opposes unconstitutional legislative efforts to limit the use of boycotts to further civil rights at home and abroad; and
- urges Congress, states, and civil rights leaders from all communities to endeavor to preserve the freedom of advocacy for all by opposing anti-boycott resolutions and legislation.
The resolution from Omar--who's faced repeated criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike for noting the power of the Israel lobby--does not mention Israel, Palestine, or the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement known as BDS.
Still, CodePink, in an email to supporters, framed the new measure as "a counterweight" to the bipartisan H.R. 246, a pending measure that seeks to oppose "efforts to delegitimize the state of Israel and the global boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement targeting Israel."
Strikingly, while Lewis is a co-sponsor of H.R. 246, Tlaib and other critics of the anti-BDS proposal have called it "unconstitutional."
Lewis's co-sponsorship of the new H.Res.496, CodePink said in its email, is one "of the most incredible aspects of this resolution." The group noted that he's "a long-time civil rights leader and 32-year-long congressmember known for his strong support for Israel."
As such, the group said, having Rep. Lewis as part of the resolution making clear the right to engage in political boycotts "sends a clear and direct statement that the right to boycott must be protected, regardless of one's position on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. This is a game-changer!"
Jewish Voice for Peace also applauded Omar's new resolution, praising the three House lawmakers for their "unwavering support for human rights, free speech, and the fight for social justice--everywhere."
The BDS National Committee also made the connection to the measure's broad affirmation of the right to boycott and how it affects the BDS activists.
"This groundbreaking resolution will inspire human rights defenders everywhere, including BDS activists for Palestinian rights," said Hind Awwad on behalf of the movement, adding that it provides reassurance "that progressives, including in Congress, are defending freedom of expression and the right of oppressed communities, including Palestinian, to peacefully fight for their rights."
This piece has been updated to correct the spelling of Hind Awwad's name. We regret the error.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rep. Ilhan Omar drew praise for introducing a resolution on Wednesday affirming the use of boycotts as constitutionally-protected free speech and a tactic for effecting social change.
"This is HISTORIC!" tweeted antiwar group CodePink.
Co-sponsored by Democratic Reps. Rashida Tlaib (Mich.) and John Lewis (Ga.), H.R. 496 says that "governments and nongovernmental organizations alike have sought to criminalize, stigmatize, and delegitimize the use of boycotts in an attempt to stifle constitutionally protected political expression."
Per the text, the resolution:
- affirms that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts in pursuit of civil and human rights at home and abroad, as protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution;
- opposes unconstitutional legislative efforts to limit the use of boycotts to further civil rights at home and abroad; and
- urges Congress, states, and civil rights leaders from all communities to endeavor to preserve the freedom of advocacy for all by opposing anti-boycott resolutions and legislation.
The resolution from Omar--who's faced repeated criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike for noting the power of the Israel lobby--does not mention Israel, Palestine, or the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement known as BDS.
Still, CodePink, in an email to supporters, framed the new measure as "a counterweight" to the bipartisan H.R. 246, a pending measure that seeks to oppose "efforts to delegitimize the state of Israel and the global boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement targeting Israel."
Strikingly, while Lewis is a co-sponsor of H.R. 246, Tlaib and other critics of the anti-BDS proposal have called it "unconstitutional."
Lewis's co-sponsorship of the new H.Res.496, CodePink said in its email, is one "of the most incredible aspects of this resolution." The group noted that he's "a long-time civil rights leader and 32-year-long congressmember known for his strong support for Israel."
As such, the group said, having Rep. Lewis as part of the resolution making clear the right to engage in political boycotts "sends a clear and direct statement that the right to boycott must be protected, regardless of one's position on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. This is a game-changer!"
Jewish Voice for Peace also applauded Omar's new resolution, praising the three House lawmakers for their "unwavering support for human rights, free speech, and the fight for social justice--everywhere."
The BDS National Committee also made the connection to the measure's broad affirmation of the right to boycott and how it affects the BDS activists.
"This groundbreaking resolution will inspire human rights defenders everywhere, including BDS activists for Palestinian rights," said Hind Awwad on behalf of the movement, adding that it provides reassurance "that progressives, including in Congress, are defending freedom of expression and the right of oppressed communities, including Palestinian, to peacefully fight for their rights."
This piece has been updated to correct the spelling of Hind Awwad's name. We regret the error.
Rep. Ilhan Omar drew praise for introducing a resolution on Wednesday affirming the use of boycotts as constitutionally-protected free speech and a tactic for effecting social change.
"This is HISTORIC!" tweeted antiwar group CodePink.
Co-sponsored by Democratic Reps. Rashida Tlaib (Mich.) and John Lewis (Ga.), H.R. 496 says that "governments and nongovernmental organizations alike have sought to criminalize, stigmatize, and delegitimize the use of boycotts in an attempt to stifle constitutionally protected political expression."
Per the text, the resolution:
- affirms that all Americans have the right to participate in boycotts in pursuit of civil and human rights at home and abroad, as protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution;
- opposes unconstitutional legislative efforts to limit the use of boycotts to further civil rights at home and abroad; and
- urges Congress, states, and civil rights leaders from all communities to endeavor to preserve the freedom of advocacy for all by opposing anti-boycott resolutions and legislation.
The resolution from Omar--who's faced repeated criticism from Democrats and Republicans alike for noting the power of the Israel lobby--does not mention Israel, Palestine, or the boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement known as BDS.
Still, CodePink, in an email to supporters, framed the new measure as "a counterweight" to the bipartisan H.R. 246, a pending measure that seeks to oppose "efforts to delegitimize the state of Israel and the global boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement targeting Israel."
Strikingly, while Lewis is a co-sponsor of H.R. 246, Tlaib and other critics of the anti-BDS proposal have called it "unconstitutional."
Lewis's co-sponsorship of the new H.Res.496, CodePink said in its email, is one "of the most incredible aspects of this resolution." The group noted that he's "a long-time civil rights leader and 32-year-long congressmember known for his strong support for Israel."
As such, the group said, having Rep. Lewis as part of the resolution making clear the right to engage in political boycotts "sends a clear and direct statement that the right to boycott must be protected, regardless of one's position on the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. This is a game-changer!"
Jewish Voice for Peace also applauded Omar's new resolution, praising the three House lawmakers for their "unwavering support for human rights, free speech, and the fight for social justice--everywhere."
The BDS National Committee also made the connection to the measure's broad affirmation of the right to boycott and how it affects the BDS activists.
"This groundbreaking resolution will inspire human rights defenders everywhere, including BDS activists for Palestinian rights," said Hind Awwad on behalf of the movement, adding that it provides reassurance "that progressives, including in Congress, are defending freedom of expression and the right of oppressed communities, including Palestinian, to peacefully fight for their rights."
This piece has been updated to correct the spelling of Hind Awwad's name. We regret the error.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.