Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) speaks while introducing the Medicare for All Act of 2019 with Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), and Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) during a news conference on Capitol Hill, on April 9, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Mark Wilson/Getty Images)
'People Don't Like Insurance Companies, They Like Their Doctors': Poll Shows Majority of Voters Support Abolishing Private Insurers If They Can Keep Providers
"Despite what the pharmaceutical and insurance industries will tell you, Medicare for All is the only proposal that gives Americans the freedom to control their own futures," said Sen. Bernie Sanders's 2020 campaign
Bolstering single-payer proponents' argument that Americans like and want to keep their doctors and hospitals, not their private insurance companies, a survey released Tuesday found that the majority of voters support a Medicare for All plan that eliminates private insurers if they can hold on to their healthcare providers.
"These numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don't like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders presidential campaign
Conducted by Morning Consult and Politico after the first Democratic presidential debates, the poll (pdf) found 55 percent of voters back a Medicare for All system that "diminishes the role of private insurers but allows you to keep your doctor and hospital."
According to the survey, 78 percent of Democrats, 56 percent of independents, and 26 percent of Republicans--averaging 55 percent overall--support a Medicare for All plan that phases out private insurance and allows them to keep their doctors and hospitals.
In a statement to Morning Consult, Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) presidential campaign said "[t]hese numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don't like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals."
"Despite what the pharmaceutical and insurance industries will tell you," the campaign said, "Medicare for All is the only proposal that gives Americans the freedom to control their own futures--change jobs, start a family, start a business--and keep their doctor."
As Morning Consult's Yusra Murad noted, the new data shows that voters' concerns about virtually abolishing the private insurance industry "can be mitigated by clarifying that losing private insurers would not affect access to preferred providers."
\u201cMajority Backs \u2018Medicare for All\u2019 Replacing Private Plans, if Preferred Providers Stay https://t.co/Pn9A7dew3f via @ymurad__\u201d— Morning Consult (@Morning Consult) 1562068801
The issue of whether Americans like their private insurance companies arose during the second night of the Democratic presidential debates last Thursday, when Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.)--an opponent of Medicare for All--expressed support for creating a public option while upholding private insurance "for others that want to keep it."
Sanders, the lead sponsor of the Medicare for All Act in the Senate, responded by pointing out that Medicare "is the most popular health insurance program in the country."
"People don't like their private insurance companies," Sanders said. "They like their doctors and hospitals. Under our plan, people can go to any doctor or any hospital they want. We will substantially lower the cost of health care because we stop the greed of the insurance companies."
As the Washington Post's Paul Waldeman noted in a column in April, under Sanders's Medicare for All plan, "You wouldn't have to worry about losing your doctor, because with the possible exception of 'concierge' practices serving the rich, every doctor would accept it; there would be no more networks that don't include the doctors you want to see."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Bolstering single-payer proponents' argument that Americans like and want to keep their doctors and hospitals, not their private insurance companies, a survey released Tuesday found that the majority of voters support a Medicare for All plan that eliminates private insurers if they can hold on to their healthcare providers.
"These numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don't like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders presidential campaign
Conducted by Morning Consult and Politico after the first Democratic presidential debates, the poll (pdf) found 55 percent of voters back a Medicare for All system that "diminishes the role of private insurers but allows you to keep your doctor and hospital."
According to the survey, 78 percent of Democrats, 56 percent of independents, and 26 percent of Republicans--averaging 55 percent overall--support a Medicare for All plan that phases out private insurance and allows them to keep their doctors and hospitals.
In a statement to Morning Consult, Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) presidential campaign said "[t]hese numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don't like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals."
"Despite what the pharmaceutical and insurance industries will tell you," the campaign said, "Medicare for All is the only proposal that gives Americans the freedom to control their own futures--change jobs, start a family, start a business--and keep their doctor."
As Morning Consult's Yusra Murad noted, the new data shows that voters' concerns about virtually abolishing the private insurance industry "can be mitigated by clarifying that losing private insurers would not affect access to preferred providers."
\u201cMajority Backs \u2018Medicare for All\u2019 Replacing Private Plans, if Preferred Providers Stay https://t.co/Pn9A7dew3f via @ymurad__\u201d— Morning Consult (@Morning Consult) 1562068801
The issue of whether Americans like their private insurance companies arose during the second night of the Democratic presidential debates last Thursday, when Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.)--an opponent of Medicare for All--expressed support for creating a public option while upholding private insurance "for others that want to keep it."
Sanders, the lead sponsor of the Medicare for All Act in the Senate, responded by pointing out that Medicare "is the most popular health insurance program in the country."
"People don't like their private insurance companies," Sanders said. "They like their doctors and hospitals. Under our plan, people can go to any doctor or any hospital they want. We will substantially lower the cost of health care because we stop the greed of the insurance companies."
As the Washington Post's Paul Waldeman noted in a column in April, under Sanders's Medicare for All plan, "You wouldn't have to worry about losing your doctor, because with the possible exception of 'concierge' practices serving the rich, every doctor would accept it; there would be no more networks that don't include the doctors you want to see."
Bolstering single-payer proponents' argument that Americans like and want to keep their doctors and hospitals, not their private insurance companies, a survey released Tuesday found that the majority of voters support a Medicare for All plan that eliminates private insurers if they can hold on to their healthcare providers.
"These numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don't like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals."
--Sen. Bernie Sanders presidential campaign
Conducted by Morning Consult and Politico after the first Democratic presidential debates, the poll (pdf) found 55 percent of voters back a Medicare for All system that "diminishes the role of private insurers but allows you to keep your doctor and hospital."
According to the survey, 78 percent of Democrats, 56 percent of independents, and 26 percent of Republicans--averaging 55 percent overall--support a Medicare for All plan that phases out private insurance and allows them to keep their doctors and hospitals.
In a statement to Morning Consult, Sen. Bernie Sanders's (I-Vt.) presidential campaign said "[t]hese numbers only affirm what the senator has said many times: people don't like insurance companies, they like their doctors and their hospitals."
"Despite what the pharmaceutical and insurance industries will tell you," the campaign said, "Medicare for All is the only proposal that gives Americans the freedom to control their own futures--change jobs, start a family, start a business--and keep their doctor."
As Morning Consult's Yusra Murad noted, the new data shows that voters' concerns about virtually abolishing the private insurance industry "can be mitigated by clarifying that losing private insurers would not affect access to preferred providers."
\u201cMajority Backs \u2018Medicare for All\u2019 Replacing Private Plans, if Preferred Providers Stay https://t.co/Pn9A7dew3f via @ymurad__\u201d— Morning Consult (@Morning Consult) 1562068801
The issue of whether Americans like their private insurance companies arose during the second night of the Democratic presidential debates last Thursday, when Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.)--an opponent of Medicare for All--expressed support for creating a public option while upholding private insurance "for others that want to keep it."
Sanders, the lead sponsor of the Medicare for All Act in the Senate, responded by pointing out that Medicare "is the most popular health insurance program in the country."
"People don't like their private insurance companies," Sanders said. "They like their doctors and hospitals. Under our plan, people can go to any doctor or any hospital they want. We will substantially lower the cost of health care because we stop the greed of the insurance companies."
As the Washington Post's Paul Waldeman noted in a column in April, under Sanders's Medicare for All plan, "You wouldn't have to worry about losing your doctor, because with the possible exception of 'concierge' practices serving the rich, every doctor would accept it; there would be no more networks that don't include the doctors you want to see."