A protester stands outside the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission hearing on Enbridge's Line 3 in downtown St. Paul. (Photo: Lorie Shaull/flickr/cc)
Jun 03, 2019
Enbridge's Line 3 was dealt a setback by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Monday while a trio of water protectors sustained strong resistance to the project by locking themselves to machinery to block work on the proposed oil pipeline.
The three-judge panel, with one of the judges objecting, reversed the approval that the state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) gave last year to the Calgary-based company's environmental impact statement, calling it "inadequate because it didn't address the potential impact of an oil spill into the Lake Superior watershed."
Advocacy group Environment Minnesota celebrated the development on Twitter, writing, "This is such great news."
The decision means the statement goes back to PUC, as the Star Tribunereported.
As Common Dreams previously reported,
The Line 3 project, which Calgary-based Enbridge says is its largest ever, would replace a cracked and corroded crude oil pipeline installed in the 1960s with a 1,031-mile pipeline that would run from Canada's Alberta tar sands to a Wisconsin shipping hub. If constructed, it would cut through Native American reservations and treaty lands in Northern Minnesota, jeopardizing fresh water resources and wild rice beds that local Indigenous peoples consider their "primary economic, nutritional, and cultural resource."
Such impacts brought three pipeline foes to an active construction site for the proposed pipeline in Park Rapids, Minnesota, where they locked themselves to logging equipment.
According to the Minnesota-based and native-led organization Honor the Earth: "Great River Energy is bulldozing through the wetlands and forests to build powerlines for the Line 3 tar sands pipeline. Enbridge has no water crossing permits, but it works on."
"Great River Energy specifies in its Army Corps application that it is building the electric transmission line to power Enbridge's pipeline unbuilt pump station," organizers added in a press statement.
\u201cBREAKING: 3 water protectors lock to equipment at an Enbridge worksite in MN! Great River Energy is bulldozing through the wetlands and forests to build powerlines for the Line 3 tar sands pipeline. Enbridge has no water crossing permits, but it works on. #EnbridgeLies #StopLine3\u201d— tara houska \u1516\u1433\u140c\u1474 (@tara houska \u1516\u1433\u140c\u1474) 1559579869
Organizers posted video of the action, which was supported by the Ginew Collective, Northfield Against Line 3, and others, on Facebook:
As of this writing, the three activists were still at the site and locked to the machinery, and work was still shut down.
\u201cWater Protectors, Mollie, Francis and Jonas, are still locked to machinery to stop Line 3. After over 4 hrs they\u2019ve shut down work on the site for the day! Give generously to their bail fund: https://t.co/gK16PiDsq8\u201d— Resist Line 3 (@Resist Line 3) 1559592078
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Enbridge's Line 3 was dealt a setback by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Monday while a trio of water protectors sustained strong resistance to the project by locking themselves to machinery to block work on the proposed oil pipeline.
The three-judge panel, with one of the judges objecting, reversed the approval that the state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) gave last year to the Calgary-based company's environmental impact statement, calling it "inadequate because it didn't address the potential impact of an oil spill into the Lake Superior watershed."
Advocacy group Environment Minnesota celebrated the development on Twitter, writing, "This is such great news."
The decision means the statement goes back to PUC, as the Star Tribunereported.
As Common Dreams previously reported,
The Line 3 project, which Calgary-based Enbridge says is its largest ever, would replace a cracked and corroded crude oil pipeline installed in the 1960s with a 1,031-mile pipeline that would run from Canada's Alberta tar sands to a Wisconsin shipping hub. If constructed, it would cut through Native American reservations and treaty lands in Northern Minnesota, jeopardizing fresh water resources and wild rice beds that local Indigenous peoples consider their "primary economic, nutritional, and cultural resource."
Such impacts brought three pipeline foes to an active construction site for the proposed pipeline in Park Rapids, Minnesota, where they locked themselves to logging equipment.
According to the Minnesota-based and native-led organization Honor the Earth: "Great River Energy is bulldozing through the wetlands and forests to build powerlines for the Line 3 tar sands pipeline. Enbridge has no water crossing permits, but it works on."
"Great River Energy specifies in its Army Corps application that it is building the electric transmission line to power Enbridge's pipeline unbuilt pump station," organizers added in a press statement.
\u201cBREAKING: 3 water protectors lock to equipment at an Enbridge worksite in MN! Great River Energy is bulldozing through the wetlands and forests to build powerlines for the Line 3 tar sands pipeline. Enbridge has no water crossing permits, but it works on. #EnbridgeLies #StopLine3\u201d— tara houska \u1516\u1433\u140c\u1474 (@tara houska \u1516\u1433\u140c\u1474) 1559579869
Organizers posted video of the action, which was supported by the Ginew Collective, Northfield Against Line 3, and others, on Facebook:
As of this writing, the three activists were still at the site and locked to the machinery, and work was still shut down.
\u201cWater Protectors, Mollie, Francis and Jonas, are still locked to machinery to stop Line 3. After over 4 hrs they\u2019ve shut down work on the site for the day! Give generously to their bail fund: https://t.co/gK16PiDsq8\u201d— Resist Line 3 (@Resist Line 3) 1559592078
Enbridge's Line 3 was dealt a setback by the Minnesota Court of Appeals on Monday while a trio of water protectors sustained strong resistance to the project by locking themselves to machinery to block work on the proposed oil pipeline.
The three-judge panel, with one of the judges objecting, reversed the approval that the state Public Utilities Commission (PUC) gave last year to the Calgary-based company's environmental impact statement, calling it "inadequate because it didn't address the potential impact of an oil spill into the Lake Superior watershed."
Advocacy group Environment Minnesota celebrated the development on Twitter, writing, "This is such great news."
The decision means the statement goes back to PUC, as the Star Tribunereported.
As Common Dreams previously reported,
The Line 3 project, which Calgary-based Enbridge says is its largest ever, would replace a cracked and corroded crude oil pipeline installed in the 1960s with a 1,031-mile pipeline that would run from Canada's Alberta tar sands to a Wisconsin shipping hub. If constructed, it would cut through Native American reservations and treaty lands in Northern Minnesota, jeopardizing fresh water resources and wild rice beds that local Indigenous peoples consider their "primary economic, nutritional, and cultural resource."
Such impacts brought three pipeline foes to an active construction site for the proposed pipeline in Park Rapids, Minnesota, where they locked themselves to logging equipment.
According to the Minnesota-based and native-led organization Honor the Earth: "Great River Energy is bulldozing through the wetlands and forests to build powerlines for the Line 3 tar sands pipeline. Enbridge has no water crossing permits, but it works on."
"Great River Energy specifies in its Army Corps application that it is building the electric transmission line to power Enbridge's pipeline unbuilt pump station," organizers added in a press statement.
\u201cBREAKING: 3 water protectors lock to equipment at an Enbridge worksite in MN! Great River Energy is bulldozing through the wetlands and forests to build powerlines for the Line 3 tar sands pipeline. Enbridge has no water crossing permits, but it works on. #EnbridgeLies #StopLine3\u201d— tara houska \u1516\u1433\u140c\u1474 (@tara houska \u1516\u1433\u140c\u1474) 1559579869
Organizers posted video of the action, which was supported by the Ginew Collective, Northfield Against Line 3, and others, on Facebook:
As of this writing, the three activists were still at the site and locked to the machinery, and work was still shut down.
\u201cWater Protectors, Mollie, Francis and Jonas, are still locked to machinery to stop Line 3. After over 4 hrs they\u2019ve shut down work on the site for the day! Give generously to their bail fund: https://t.co/gK16PiDsq8\u201d— Resist Line 3 (@Resist Line 3) 1559592078
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.