As "murky" intelligence reports swirl and the White House works overtime to establish its narrative with evidence-free warnings of a supposedly growing Iranian threat, foreign policy experts and analysts are attempting to set the record straight by establishing precisely who is responsible for the dangerously high tensions in the Middle East that could spark a catastrophic war.
"The current crisis atmosphere in U.S.-Iranian relations, in which the risk of open warfare appears greater than it has been in years, is solely and unequivocally due to the policies and actions of the Trump administration."
The unequivocal answer, according to former CIA Middle East analyst Paul Pillar, is the Trump administration.
"The current crisis atmosphere in U.S.-Iranian relations, in which the risk of open warfare appears greater than it has been in years, is solely and unequivocally due to the policies and actions of the Trump administration," Pillar wrote in a Thursday column for Lobe Log.
"To point this out does not mean that actions of the Iranian regime have not come to be part of the crisis atmosphere as well," Pillar added. "It instead means that such an atmosphere would never have existed in the first place if the administration had not turned its obsession with Iran into the relentless campaign of hostility."
Pillar's assessment of the growing threat of yet another U.S.-led war in the Middle East seemed to be bolstered by a Wall Street Journal report late Thursday, which suggested that intelligence collected by the American government shows "Iran's leaders believe the U.S. planned to attack them, prompting preparation by Tehran for possible counterstrikes."
"That view of the intelligence," the Journal reported, "could help explain why Iranian forces and their allies took action that was seen as threatening to U.S. forces in Iraq and elsewhere, prompting a U.S. military buildup in the Persian Gulf region and a drawdown of U.S. diplomats in Iraq."
"There you have it," Farnaz Fassihi, a senior writer for the Journal, tweeted in response to the new reporting. "Trump action provokes Iran reaction provokes U.S. reaction and suddenly march to another quagmire catastrophic war."
— Farnaz Fassihi (@farnazfassihi) May 17, 2019
This timeline of events—which was echoed by reporting from The Daily Beast Thursday—flatly contradicts the Trump administration's insistence that Iranian aggression prompted the United States' recent militaristic actions and threats, the most prominent of which have been issued by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and national security adviser John Bolton.
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, told The Daily Beast that the intelligence he has reviewed, which he characterized as "murky," has led him to believe "that most of the activities that the Iranians are undertaking are in response to our very aggressive posture in the region."
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Progressive independent media doesn’t exist without support from its readers.
There’s no way around it. No ads. No billionaires. Just the people who believe in this mission and our work.
If you believe the survival of independent media is vital to do the kind of watchdog journalism that a healthy democracy requires, please step forward with a donation to non-profit Common Dreams today:
Based on the latest reporting on the intelligence community's findings, Washington Post Middle East correspondent Louisa Loveluck outlined the series of events that led to the dangerously high tensions of the present moment:
So according to @WSJ, US-Iran tensions spiked as follows:
1. Hawkish US officials intensify pressure on Iran.
2. Iran fears attack.
3. Iran prepares counter-strikes.
4. US gets spooked, raises threat level.
5. Trump demurs: wants talks, not war.https://t.co/RNyrzamfyr
— Louisa Loveluck (@leloveluck) May 17, 2019
Anti-war voices and analysts have been warning that the Trump administration could attempt to start a war with Iran at least since the president decided in March of last year to hire Bolton—the man who in 2015 penned a New York Times op-ed headlined "To Stop Iran's Bomb, Bomb Iran"—as his national security adviser.
Less than two months later, Trump violated the Iran nuclear accord by unilaterally withdrawing the U.S. from the agreement.
"This is how the Iran war started," Trita Parsi, founder of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), tweeted at the time.
Now, fearing that their ominous predictions are dangerously close to coming true, anti-war advocacy groups and members of Congress are moving to prevent what would be a devastating military conflict.
"Time is running out," warns a NIAC petition. "Iraq-war architect John Bolton and his cabal of hawks are doing everything in their power to stoke a war with Iran. Our community must act now to prevent history from repeating itself."
This is a turning point: we can either stay quiet, or we can stand up now and demand #NoWarWithIran. Will you join our pro-peace movement with @rezaaslan? https://t.co/y8RX9SthFu pic.twitter.com/nZdyyiqaf7
— NIAC Action (@NIACAction) May 15, 2019
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a 2020 presidential candidate, circulated a petition of his own on Thursday, urging Congress to pass legislation to forestall the possibility of war with Iran.
"If we turn our backs on a non-violent solution in favor of more military conflict, that we will find ourselves in perpetual warfare," Sanders wrote in an email to supporters. "Mark my words. A war in Iran would make the Iraq war look like a walk in the park. It will be an unmitigated disaster. So Congress must intervene and utilize its constitutional authority—before it's too late."