SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Former White House counsel Don McGahn listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a Cabinet meeting at the White House on Aug. 16. (Photo: Andrew Harnik/AP)
'The President's Obstruction Continues': White House Reportedly Asked Key Witness to Say Trump Didn't Obstruct Justice
"The White House knows Trump hasn't been 'totally exonerated.' They asked McGahn to lie because they know there's overwhelming evidence of obstruction."
May 11, 2019
At President Donald Trump's request, White House officials reportedly asked Don McGahn--the president's former counsel and a key witness in the Mueller report--to say publicly that Trump never obstructed justice.
According to the New York Times, which cited two anonymous individuals briefed on the request, the White House asked McGahn to make a public statement on obstruction "at least twice in the past month"--once before the Mueller report was released to the public and once after.
"Mr. Trump asked White House officials to make the request to Mr. McGahn," the Times reported on Friday. "Mr. McGahn declined. His reluctance angered the president, who believed that Mr. McGahn showed disloyalty by telling investigators for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, about Mr. Trump's attempts to maintain control over the Russia investigation."
The Times report continued:
The president's lawyers are particularly concerned about two episodes that Mr. McGahn detailed to prosecutors. In one, Mr. Trump asked him to fire the special counsel but backed off after Mr. McGahn refused. After that episode was revealed, the president asked Mr. McGahn to create a White House document falsely rebutting his account. Mr. McGahn declined to go along but told Mr. Mueller about the encounters.
The Wall Street Journal also reported late Friday that McGahn "rebuffed" a request from White House officials to issue a statement declaring that Trump did not obstruct justice.
Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), suggested on Twitter that the White House's reported requests to McGahn may amount to obstruction of justice in themselves:
The Times report comes as McGahn is facing a subpoena from Democrats to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on the special counsel's findings.
The Trump White House has instructed McGahn to refuse to comply with Democrats' subpoena, and House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) has threatened to hold McGahn in contempt.
"This is why it is critical for Mr. McGahn to come before our committee and answer questions for the American people," Nadler tweeted following the Times report. "The president cannot keep McGahn from testifying."
The Mueller report details numerous instances in which Trump potentially committed obstruction of justice, though Mueller did not reach a conclusion on the question.
Following the release of Mueller's findings, Attorney General William Barr--who has been accused of acting as the president's personal lawyer as he refuses to comply with congressional oversight--decided not to charge Trump with obstruction of justice.
"The White House knows Trump hasn't been 'totally exonerated,'" progressive advocacy group Stand Up America wrote in a series of tweets in response to the Times report. "They asked McGahn to lie because they know there's overwhelming evidence of obstruction. "
"The evidence is so strong that if Trump were not president," the group added, "he'd be heading to prison."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
At President Donald Trump's request, White House officials reportedly asked Don McGahn--the president's former counsel and a key witness in the Mueller report--to say publicly that Trump never obstructed justice.
According to the New York Times, which cited two anonymous individuals briefed on the request, the White House asked McGahn to make a public statement on obstruction "at least twice in the past month"--once before the Mueller report was released to the public and once after.
"Mr. Trump asked White House officials to make the request to Mr. McGahn," the Times reported on Friday. "Mr. McGahn declined. His reluctance angered the president, who believed that Mr. McGahn showed disloyalty by telling investigators for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, about Mr. Trump's attempts to maintain control over the Russia investigation."
The Times report continued:
The president's lawyers are particularly concerned about two episodes that Mr. McGahn detailed to prosecutors. In one, Mr. Trump asked him to fire the special counsel but backed off after Mr. McGahn refused. After that episode was revealed, the president asked Mr. McGahn to create a White House document falsely rebutting his account. Mr. McGahn declined to go along but told Mr. Mueller about the encounters.
The Wall Street Journal also reported late Friday that McGahn "rebuffed" a request from White House officials to issue a statement declaring that Trump did not obstruct justice.
Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), suggested on Twitter that the White House's reported requests to McGahn may amount to obstruction of justice in themselves:
The Times report comes as McGahn is facing a subpoena from Democrats to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on the special counsel's findings.
The Trump White House has instructed McGahn to refuse to comply with Democrats' subpoena, and House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) has threatened to hold McGahn in contempt.
"This is why it is critical for Mr. McGahn to come before our committee and answer questions for the American people," Nadler tweeted following the Times report. "The president cannot keep McGahn from testifying."
The Mueller report details numerous instances in which Trump potentially committed obstruction of justice, though Mueller did not reach a conclusion on the question.
Following the release of Mueller's findings, Attorney General William Barr--who has been accused of acting as the president's personal lawyer as he refuses to comply with congressional oversight--decided not to charge Trump with obstruction of justice.
"The White House knows Trump hasn't been 'totally exonerated,'" progressive advocacy group Stand Up America wrote in a series of tweets in response to the Times report. "They asked McGahn to lie because they know there's overwhelming evidence of obstruction. "
"The evidence is so strong that if Trump were not president," the group added, "he'd be heading to prison."
At President Donald Trump's request, White House officials reportedly asked Don McGahn--the president's former counsel and a key witness in the Mueller report--to say publicly that Trump never obstructed justice.
According to the New York Times, which cited two anonymous individuals briefed on the request, the White House asked McGahn to make a public statement on obstruction "at least twice in the past month"--once before the Mueller report was released to the public and once after.
"Mr. Trump asked White House officials to make the request to Mr. McGahn," the Times reported on Friday. "Mr. McGahn declined. His reluctance angered the president, who believed that Mr. McGahn showed disloyalty by telling investigators for the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, about Mr. Trump's attempts to maintain control over the Russia investigation."
The Times report continued:
The president's lawyers are particularly concerned about two episodes that Mr. McGahn detailed to prosecutors. In one, Mr. Trump asked him to fire the special counsel but backed off after Mr. McGahn refused. After that episode was revealed, the president asked Mr. McGahn to create a White House document falsely rebutting his account. Mr. McGahn declined to go along but told Mr. Mueller about the encounters.
The Wall Street Journal also reported late Friday that McGahn "rebuffed" a request from White House officials to issue a statement declaring that Trump did not obstruct justice.
Noah Bookbinder, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), suggested on Twitter that the White House's reported requests to McGahn may amount to obstruction of justice in themselves:
The Times report comes as McGahn is facing a subpoena from Democrats to testify before the House Judiciary Committee on the special counsel's findings.
The Trump White House has instructed McGahn to refuse to comply with Democrats' subpoena, and House Judiciary Committee chairman Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) has threatened to hold McGahn in contempt.
"This is why it is critical for Mr. McGahn to come before our committee and answer questions for the American people," Nadler tweeted following the Times report. "The president cannot keep McGahn from testifying."
The Mueller report details numerous instances in which Trump potentially committed obstruction of justice, though Mueller did not reach a conclusion on the question.
Following the release of Mueller's findings, Attorney General William Barr--who has been accused of acting as the president's personal lawyer as he refuses to comply with congressional oversight--decided not to charge Trump with obstruction of justice.
"The White House knows Trump hasn't been 'totally exonerated,'" progressive advocacy group Stand Up America wrote in a series of tweets in response to the Times report. "They asked McGahn to lie because they know there's overwhelming evidence of obstruction. "
"The evidence is so strong that if Trump were not president," the group added, "he'd be heading to prison."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.