SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
An Exxon sign in Framingham, MA. (Photo: Brian Katt, Wikimedia Commons)
Following Monsanto, Exxon Could Be Next US Corporation to Face EU Lobby Ban
"Big Oil is the new Big Tobacco."
Mar 22, 2019
ExxonMobil could soon join Monsanto as one of the only two companies not allowed to lobby European Union lawmakers.
The oil giant, one of the world's largest energy companies, was a no-show at a climate change denial hearing in Brussels Thursday, prompting the action.
In a statement, ExxonMobil said that it was unable to attend because of "ongoing climate change-related litigation in the U.S."
That wasn't good enough for Molly Scott Cato, a Green Party member of the European Parliament. In a statement, Green said a company which had spent millions on climate denial and then ducked responsibility for its actions didn't deserve the right to promote itself in the EU.
"We cannot allow the lobbyists from such corporations free access to the corridors of the European parliament," said Cato. "We must remove their badges immediately."
ExxonMobil spent over EUR35 million on lobbying efforts in the EU since 2010. If the vote goes against the energy giant, it would lose that right in the European Parliament.
Agribusiness and chemical conglomerate Monsanto lost EU lobbying rights in 2017 after the company refused to attend a hearing on the safety of the chemical glyphosate in the weedkiller RoundUp and Monsanto's role in attempting to manipulate the regulatory process around the product.
"Those who ignore the rules of democracy also lose their rights as a lobbyist in the European parliament," Green party president Philippe Lamberts said at the time.
In a letter to the committee announcing its refusal to attend Thursday's hearing, ExxonMobil said that it was certain a review of the facts would exonerate the company from accusations that it secretly knew the dangers of carbon emissions for decades while continuing to fund and promote climate denialism.
"We are confident that a neutral review of the facts will refute the allegations made by the company's critics that are distortions of ExxonMobil's nearly 40-year history of climate research," the company wrote.
\u201cIn ExxonMobil's letter declining to attend the EU hearing, the company emphasizes the importance of tackling climate: "There are few challenges more important than meeting the world's growing demand for energy while reducing environmental impacts and the risks of climate change."\u201d— Energy In Depth (@Energy In Depth) 1553165413
Internal documents provided to the hearing by Harvard University research fellow Geoffrey Supran told a different story--that ExxonMobil knew of the damage its product was causing the planet since at least 1977 but pushed forward with promoting climate change denialism anyway.
"It is the overwhelming consensus of experts studying the history of fossil fuel funding that companies, including ExxonMobil, have orchestrated, funded and perpetuated climate misinformation to mislead the public and politicians, and stifle action," Supran said. "Unfortunately, they largely succeeded."
Advocates for climate responsibility celebrated the move against ExxonMobil.
\u201cI just testified as an expert witness to EU Parliament about ExxonMobil's decades of climate denial + delay. Between being the first major hearing of its kind, a leaked Exxon memo, & the rising prospect of Exxon being banned from EU lobbying, it was an interesting day. THREAD\u201d— Geoffrey Supran (@Geoffrey Supran) 1553261130
"Big Oil is the new Big Tobacco," said environmentalist Bill McKibben.
\u201cBig Oil is the new Big Tobacco--and the EU may actually strip Exxon of its lobbying privileges. Thanks to @GeoffreySupran for his testimony! https://t.co/oOt7p9x7P3\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1553262045
Sinn Fein member Lynn Boylan pointed out that the company has spent millions on a movement to stop or slow climate action.
\u201cExxon has spent over \u20ac35 million since 2010 in lobbying EU institutions to delay & weaken essential climate action. They also rely on a number of major trade associations to lobby on its behalf......oh yeah & they support carbon tax! Think about it.... https://t.co/dBtzZbFyFZ\u201d— Lynn Boylan \ud83c\udf77\ud83d\udcd6\ud83d\udc3e (@Lynn Boylan \ud83c\udf77\ud83d\udcd6\ud83d\udc3e) 1553194429
Watch Supran's testimony here:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
ExxonMobil could soon join Monsanto as one of the only two companies not allowed to lobby European Union lawmakers.
The oil giant, one of the world's largest energy companies, was a no-show at a climate change denial hearing in Brussels Thursday, prompting the action.
In a statement, ExxonMobil said that it was unable to attend because of "ongoing climate change-related litigation in the U.S."
That wasn't good enough for Molly Scott Cato, a Green Party member of the European Parliament. In a statement, Green said a company which had spent millions on climate denial and then ducked responsibility for its actions didn't deserve the right to promote itself in the EU.
"We cannot allow the lobbyists from such corporations free access to the corridors of the European parliament," said Cato. "We must remove their badges immediately."
ExxonMobil spent over EUR35 million on lobbying efforts in the EU since 2010. If the vote goes against the energy giant, it would lose that right in the European Parliament.
Agribusiness and chemical conglomerate Monsanto lost EU lobbying rights in 2017 after the company refused to attend a hearing on the safety of the chemical glyphosate in the weedkiller RoundUp and Monsanto's role in attempting to manipulate the regulatory process around the product.
"Those who ignore the rules of democracy also lose their rights as a lobbyist in the European parliament," Green party president Philippe Lamberts said at the time.
In a letter to the committee announcing its refusal to attend Thursday's hearing, ExxonMobil said that it was certain a review of the facts would exonerate the company from accusations that it secretly knew the dangers of carbon emissions for decades while continuing to fund and promote climate denialism.
"We are confident that a neutral review of the facts will refute the allegations made by the company's critics that are distortions of ExxonMobil's nearly 40-year history of climate research," the company wrote.
\u201cIn ExxonMobil's letter declining to attend the EU hearing, the company emphasizes the importance of tackling climate: "There are few challenges more important than meeting the world's growing demand for energy while reducing environmental impacts and the risks of climate change."\u201d— Energy In Depth (@Energy In Depth) 1553165413
Internal documents provided to the hearing by Harvard University research fellow Geoffrey Supran told a different story--that ExxonMobil knew of the damage its product was causing the planet since at least 1977 but pushed forward with promoting climate change denialism anyway.
"It is the overwhelming consensus of experts studying the history of fossil fuel funding that companies, including ExxonMobil, have orchestrated, funded and perpetuated climate misinformation to mislead the public and politicians, and stifle action," Supran said. "Unfortunately, they largely succeeded."
Advocates for climate responsibility celebrated the move against ExxonMobil.
\u201cI just testified as an expert witness to EU Parliament about ExxonMobil's decades of climate denial + delay. Between being the first major hearing of its kind, a leaked Exxon memo, & the rising prospect of Exxon being banned from EU lobbying, it was an interesting day. THREAD\u201d— Geoffrey Supran (@Geoffrey Supran) 1553261130
"Big Oil is the new Big Tobacco," said environmentalist Bill McKibben.
\u201cBig Oil is the new Big Tobacco--and the EU may actually strip Exxon of its lobbying privileges. Thanks to @GeoffreySupran for his testimony! https://t.co/oOt7p9x7P3\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1553262045
Sinn Fein member Lynn Boylan pointed out that the company has spent millions on a movement to stop or slow climate action.
\u201cExxon has spent over \u20ac35 million since 2010 in lobbying EU institutions to delay & weaken essential climate action. They also rely on a number of major trade associations to lobby on its behalf......oh yeah & they support carbon tax! Think about it.... https://t.co/dBtzZbFyFZ\u201d— Lynn Boylan \ud83c\udf77\ud83d\udcd6\ud83d\udc3e (@Lynn Boylan \ud83c\udf77\ud83d\udcd6\ud83d\udc3e) 1553194429
Watch Supran's testimony here:
ExxonMobil could soon join Monsanto as one of the only two companies not allowed to lobby European Union lawmakers.
The oil giant, one of the world's largest energy companies, was a no-show at a climate change denial hearing in Brussels Thursday, prompting the action.
In a statement, ExxonMobil said that it was unable to attend because of "ongoing climate change-related litigation in the U.S."
That wasn't good enough for Molly Scott Cato, a Green Party member of the European Parliament. In a statement, Green said a company which had spent millions on climate denial and then ducked responsibility for its actions didn't deserve the right to promote itself in the EU.
"We cannot allow the lobbyists from such corporations free access to the corridors of the European parliament," said Cato. "We must remove their badges immediately."
ExxonMobil spent over EUR35 million on lobbying efforts in the EU since 2010. If the vote goes against the energy giant, it would lose that right in the European Parliament.
Agribusiness and chemical conglomerate Monsanto lost EU lobbying rights in 2017 after the company refused to attend a hearing on the safety of the chemical glyphosate in the weedkiller RoundUp and Monsanto's role in attempting to manipulate the regulatory process around the product.
"Those who ignore the rules of democracy also lose their rights as a lobbyist in the European parliament," Green party president Philippe Lamberts said at the time.
In a letter to the committee announcing its refusal to attend Thursday's hearing, ExxonMobil said that it was certain a review of the facts would exonerate the company from accusations that it secretly knew the dangers of carbon emissions for decades while continuing to fund and promote climate denialism.
"We are confident that a neutral review of the facts will refute the allegations made by the company's critics that are distortions of ExxonMobil's nearly 40-year history of climate research," the company wrote.
\u201cIn ExxonMobil's letter declining to attend the EU hearing, the company emphasizes the importance of tackling climate: "There are few challenges more important than meeting the world's growing demand for energy while reducing environmental impacts and the risks of climate change."\u201d— Energy In Depth (@Energy In Depth) 1553165413
Internal documents provided to the hearing by Harvard University research fellow Geoffrey Supran told a different story--that ExxonMobil knew of the damage its product was causing the planet since at least 1977 but pushed forward with promoting climate change denialism anyway.
"It is the overwhelming consensus of experts studying the history of fossil fuel funding that companies, including ExxonMobil, have orchestrated, funded and perpetuated climate misinformation to mislead the public and politicians, and stifle action," Supran said. "Unfortunately, they largely succeeded."
Advocates for climate responsibility celebrated the move against ExxonMobil.
\u201cI just testified as an expert witness to EU Parliament about ExxonMobil's decades of climate denial + delay. Between being the first major hearing of its kind, a leaked Exxon memo, & the rising prospect of Exxon being banned from EU lobbying, it was an interesting day. THREAD\u201d— Geoffrey Supran (@Geoffrey Supran) 1553261130
"Big Oil is the new Big Tobacco," said environmentalist Bill McKibben.
\u201cBig Oil is the new Big Tobacco--and the EU may actually strip Exxon of its lobbying privileges. Thanks to @GeoffreySupran for his testimony! https://t.co/oOt7p9x7P3\u201d— Bill McKibben (@Bill McKibben) 1553262045
Sinn Fein member Lynn Boylan pointed out that the company has spent millions on a movement to stop or slow climate action.
\u201cExxon has spent over \u20ac35 million since 2010 in lobbying EU institutions to delay & weaken essential climate action. They also rely on a number of major trade associations to lobby on its behalf......oh yeah & they support carbon tax! Think about it.... https://t.co/dBtzZbFyFZ\u201d— Lynn Boylan \ud83c\udf77\ud83d\udcd6\ud83d\udc3e (@Lynn Boylan \ud83c\udf77\ud83d\udcd6\ud83d\udc3e) 1553194429
Watch Supran's testimony here:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.