SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Customs and Border Protection agents prepare to question a motorist at a checkpoint along Highway 94 outside of October 17, 2007 in Campo, California. Many states far from the border are having to confront illegal immigration issues like never before as the flow of migrants in search of work spreads to the far corners of the United States. (Photo by Sandy Huffaker/Getty Images)
Attorneys and Reporters Interrogated at Border About Political Beliefs In 'Outrageous' Violation of Rights
"This is intimidation and violates the Constitution."
Mar 19, 2019
Rights advocates are issuing fresh warnings of intimidation and repressive tactics in the wake of new reporting about U.S. border patrol agents detaining and interrogating journalists and immigration lawyers, including questions about their political beliefs.
NBC News reported Monday that at least one journalist and four immigration lawyers were stopped at Customs and Border Protection (CBP) stations near the border in Texas and Arizona in an apparent attempt to identify individuals in the area who oppose the Trump administration.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the border to target and punish activists critical of its policies, lawyers providing legal representation, or journalists simply doing their jobs. Whether near the border or not, it's a First Amendment violation and there's nothing complicated about that." --Esha Bhandari, ACLU
Taylor Levy and Hector Ruiz, who were working at the border to provide legal assistance to asylum seekers, were not included on CBP's list of 59 reporters, organizers, and perceived "instigators" in the San Diego area--but both were stopped at the border in recent months and subjected to questioning and forced to hand over their cell phones to agents.
"I was treated like a criminal," Ruiz told NBC of his experience being stopped by a group of agents as he was crossing the border near Juarez, Mexico.
Ruiz was asked about his political beliefs during a four-hour detention at a CBP station which continuted until he agreed to allow the agents to look through his cell phone contacts.
"They asked me what my opinion was on the administration, just generally. And how we are doing economically," Ruiz told NBC.
Weeks later, Levy was stopped in her car when she was attempting to cross into El Paso. She was held for two hours in a station and told that she would be arrested if she didn't answer the CBP agents' questions.
The reports of the agency's conduct were denounced as "intimidation" on social media.
\u201cMore lawyers, reporters stopped and questioned at border by U.S. officials. This is intimidation and violates the Constitution. #TrumpAuthoritarianism https://t.co/ZLXolpcM08\u201d— Alexandra Halaby (@Alexandra Halaby) 1552941061
\u201cThese accounts that @CBP is targeting or detaining U.S. Citizens that are immigration lawyers, journalists, & advocates at the border is alarming. @CBP owes Congress answers on these practices that raise constitutional flags.\nhttps://t.co/rzRdgESdAR\u201d— Congressional Hispanic Caucus (@Congressional Hispanic Caucus) 1552958400
\u201cHere are stories from more immigration lawyers and journalists targeted for questioning at the U.S. border with Mexico.\n\nMonitoring journalists and advocates for their views is outrageous, and potentially unlawful: https://t.co/huvKRJPa8y\u201d— Amnesty International USA (@Amnesty International USA) 1552949821
As Common Dreams reported last year, a change in the Immigration and Nationality Act more that 70 years ago resulted in a 100-mile zone near all U.S. borders--where 200 million people live--in which Americans officially do not have constitutional rights protecing them from warrantless searches and demands by CBP agents.
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held up the rule over the objections of the ACLU and other rights groups. The ruling has resulted in incidents like Levy's and Ruiz's detentions, as well as those of a documentary filmmaker and two other lawyers.
Esha Bhandari, an attorney with the ACLU, rejected the notion that the CBP can legally seize reporters' and lawyers' phones and detain them without cause within the 100-mile zone.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the border to target and punish activists critical of its policies, lawyers providing legal representation, or journalists simply doing their jobs. Whether near the border or not, it's a First Amendment violation and there's nothing complicated about that," Bhandari told NBC.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
customs and border protection (cbp)human rightsimmigrationjournalismmediatrumpismus department of homeland security
Rights advocates are issuing fresh warnings of intimidation and repressive tactics in the wake of new reporting about U.S. border patrol agents detaining and interrogating journalists and immigration lawyers, including questions about their political beliefs.
NBC News reported Monday that at least one journalist and four immigration lawyers were stopped at Customs and Border Protection (CBP) stations near the border in Texas and Arizona in an apparent attempt to identify individuals in the area who oppose the Trump administration.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the border to target and punish activists critical of its policies, lawyers providing legal representation, or journalists simply doing their jobs. Whether near the border or not, it's a First Amendment violation and there's nothing complicated about that." --Esha Bhandari, ACLU
Taylor Levy and Hector Ruiz, who were working at the border to provide legal assistance to asylum seekers, were not included on CBP's list of 59 reporters, organizers, and perceived "instigators" in the San Diego area--but both were stopped at the border in recent months and subjected to questioning and forced to hand over their cell phones to agents.
"I was treated like a criminal," Ruiz told NBC of his experience being stopped by a group of agents as he was crossing the border near Juarez, Mexico.
Ruiz was asked about his political beliefs during a four-hour detention at a CBP station which continuted until he agreed to allow the agents to look through his cell phone contacts.
"They asked me what my opinion was on the administration, just generally. And how we are doing economically," Ruiz told NBC.
Weeks later, Levy was stopped in her car when she was attempting to cross into El Paso. She was held for two hours in a station and told that she would be arrested if she didn't answer the CBP agents' questions.
The reports of the agency's conduct were denounced as "intimidation" on social media.
\u201cMore lawyers, reporters stopped and questioned at border by U.S. officials. This is intimidation and violates the Constitution. #TrumpAuthoritarianism https://t.co/ZLXolpcM08\u201d— Alexandra Halaby (@Alexandra Halaby) 1552941061
\u201cThese accounts that @CBP is targeting or detaining U.S. Citizens that are immigration lawyers, journalists, & advocates at the border is alarming. @CBP owes Congress answers on these practices that raise constitutional flags.\nhttps://t.co/rzRdgESdAR\u201d— Congressional Hispanic Caucus (@Congressional Hispanic Caucus) 1552958400
\u201cHere are stories from more immigration lawyers and journalists targeted for questioning at the U.S. border with Mexico.\n\nMonitoring journalists and advocates for their views is outrageous, and potentially unlawful: https://t.co/huvKRJPa8y\u201d— Amnesty International USA (@Amnesty International USA) 1552949821
As Common Dreams reported last year, a change in the Immigration and Nationality Act more that 70 years ago resulted in a 100-mile zone near all U.S. borders--where 200 million people live--in which Americans officially do not have constitutional rights protecing them from warrantless searches and demands by CBP agents.
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held up the rule over the objections of the ACLU and other rights groups. The ruling has resulted in incidents like Levy's and Ruiz's detentions, as well as those of a documentary filmmaker and two other lawyers.
Esha Bhandari, an attorney with the ACLU, rejected the notion that the CBP can legally seize reporters' and lawyers' phones and detain them without cause within the 100-mile zone.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the border to target and punish activists critical of its policies, lawyers providing legal representation, or journalists simply doing their jobs. Whether near the border or not, it's a First Amendment violation and there's nothing complicated about that," Bhandari told NBC.
Rights advocates are issuing fresh warnings of intimidation and repressive tactics in the wake of new reporting about U.S. border patrol agents detaining and interrogating journalists and immigration lawyers, including questions about their political beliefs.
NBC News reported Monday that at least one journalist and four immigration lawyers were stopped at Customs and Border Protection (CBP) stations near the border in Texas and Arizona in an apparent attempt to identify individuals in the area who oppose the Trump administration.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the border to target and punish activists critical of its policies, lawyers providing legal representation, or journalists simply doing their jobs. Whether near the border or not, it's a First Amendment violation and there's nothing complicated about that." --Esha Bhandari, ACLU
Taylor Levy and Hector Ruiz, who were working at the border to provide legal assistance to asylum seekers, were not included on CBP's list of 59 reporters, organizers, and perceived "instigators" in the San Diego area--but both were stopped at the border in recent months and subjected to questioning and forced to hand over their cell phones to agents.
"I was treated like a criminal," Ruiz told NBC of his experience being stopped by a group of agents as he was crossing the border near Juarez, Mexico.
Ruiz was asked about his political beliefs during a four-hour detention at a CBP station which continuted until he agreed to allow the agents to look through his cell phone contacts.
"They asked me what my opinion was on the administration, just generally. And how we are doing economically," Ruiz told NBC.
Weeks later, Levy was stopped in her car when she was attempting to cross into El Paso. She was held for two hours in a station and told that she would be arrested if she didn't answer the CBP agents' questions.
The reports of the agency's conduct were denounced as "intimidation" on social media.
\u201cMore lawyers, reporters stopped and questioned at border by U.S. officials. This is intimidation and violates the Constitution. #TrumpAuthoritarianism https://t.co/ZLXolpcM08\u201d— Alexandra Halaby (@Alexandra Halaby) 1552941061
\u201cThese accounts that @CBP is targeting or detaining U.S. Citizens that are immigration lawyers, journalists, & advocates at the border is alarming. @CBP owes Congress answers on these practices that raise constitutional flags.\nhttps://t.co/rzRdgESdAR\u201d— Congressional Hispanic Caucus (@Congressional Hispanic Caucus) 1552958400
\u201cHere are stories from more immigration lawyers and journalists targeted for questioning at the U.S. border with Mexico.\n\nMonitoring journalists and advocates for their views is outrageous, and potentially unlawful: https://t.co/huvKRJPa8y\u201d— Amnesty International USA (@Amnesty International USA) 1552949821
As Common Dreams reported last year, a change in the Immigration and Nationality Act more that 70 years ago resulted in a 100-mile zone near all U.S. borders--where 200 million people live--in which Americans officially do not have constitutional rights protecing them from warrantless searches and demands by CBP agents.
The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly held up the rule over the objections of the ACLU and other rights groups. The ruling has resulted in incidents like Levy's and Ruiz's detentions, as well as those of a documentary filmmaker and two other lawyers.
Esha Bhandari, an attorney with the ACLU, rejected the notion that the CBP can legally seize reporters' and lawyers' phones and detain them without cause within the 100-mile zone.
"The government cannot use the pretext of the border to target and punish activists critical of its policies, lawyers providing legal representation, or journalists simply doing their jobs. Whether near the border or not, it's a First Amendment violation and there's nothing complicated about that," Bhandari told NBC.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.