SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Under the Trump administration, federal immigration agents have detained migrant children in facilities critics have described as "cages." (U.S. Customs and Border Protection)
After Locking Migrant Children in Cages, DHS Chief Tells Congress, 'They're Not Cages'
Asked how a cage in a federal detention center differs from a dog kennel, Kirstjen Nielsen said, "It's larger."
Mar 05, 2019
After months of outrage over the Trump administration detaining migrant children in "cages," Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen insisted to members of Congress on Wednesday, "We don't use cages for children."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist."
--Rep. Bennie Thompson
At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday, Nielsen took questions from Democratic lawmakers enraged over the administration's policies of forcibly separating families to deter future asylum-seekers and locking up migrant children in facilities described as cages by reporters, lawmakers, and immigrant rights advocates.
Since last summer, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained that the U.S. government does not detain migrants in "inhumane fenced cages," despite an abundance of evidence to the contrary. Faced with intense lines of questioning from Democrats on Wednesday, Nielsen stuck to DHS's party line.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the committee's chairman, repeatedly asked Nielsen whether U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an arm of DHS, was "still putting children in cages."
"Sir, we don't use cages for children," Nielsen said. "To my knowledge, CBP never purposely put a child in a cage."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist," declared a visibly frustrated Thompson. The secretary continued to claim, "Sir, they're not cages."
"We're not going to go through the semantics," Thompson told her. "I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages--and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the committee."
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) also grilled Nielsen about federal immigration officials detaining migrant children, asking her how the cages used in detention centers by the Trump administration differed from dog kennels:
WATSON COLEMAN: What does a chain-link fence enclosed into a chamber on a concrete floor represent to you? Is that a cage?
NIELSEN: It's a detention space, ma'am, that you know has existed for decades.
WATSON COLEMAN: Does it differ from the cages you put your dogs in when you let them stay outside? Is it different?
NIELSEN: Yes.
WATSON COLEMAN: In what sense?
NIELSEN: It's larger. It has facilities. It provides room to sit, to stand, to lay down.
WATSON COLEMAN: So did my dog's cage.
Watch:
Critics quickly pushed back against Nielsen's claims, with MSNBC correspondent Jacob Soboroff sharing his report from a facility in Texas last summer:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
childrencustoms and border protection (cbp)human rightsimmigrationkirstjen nielsenrefugeesus department of homeland security
After months of outrage over the Trump administration detaining migrant children in "cages," Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen insisted to members of Congress on Wednesday, "We don't use cages for children."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist."
--Rep. Bennie Thompson
At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday, Nielsen took questions from Democratic lawmakers enraged over the administration's policies of forcibly separating families to deter future asylum-seekers and locking up migrant children in facilities described as cages by reporters, lawmakers, and immigrant rights advocates.
Since last summer, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained that the U.S. government does not detain migrants in "inhumane fenced cages," despite an abundance of evidence to the contrary. Faced with intense lines of questioning from Democrats on Wednesday, Nielsen stuck to DHS's party line.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the committee's chairman, repeatedly asked Nielsen whether U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an arm of DHS, was "still putting children in cages."
"Sir, we don't use cages for children," Nielsen said. "To my knowledge, CBP never purposely put a child in a cage."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist," declared a visibly frustrated Thompson. The secretary continued to claim, "Sir, they're not cages."
"We're not going to go through the semantics," Thompson told her. "I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages--and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the committee."
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) also grilled Nielsen about federal immigration officials detaining migrant children, asking her how the cages used in detention centers by the Trump administration differed from dog kennels:
WATSON COLEMAN: What does a chain-link fence enclosed into a chamber on a concrete floor represent to you? Is that a cage?
NIELSEN: It's a detention space, ma'am, that you know has existed for decades.
WATSON COLEMAN: Does it differ from the cages you put your dogs in when you let them stay outside? Is it different?
NIELSEN: Yes.
WATSON COLEMAN: In what sense?
NIELSEN: It's larger. It has facilities. It provides room to sit, to stand, to lay down.
WATSON COLEMAN: So did my dog's cage.
Watch:
Critics quickly pushed back against Nielsen's claims, with MSNBC correspondent Jacob Soboroff sharing his report from a facility in Texas last summer:
From Your Site Articles
After months of outrage over the Trump administration detaining migrant children in "cages," Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen insisted to members of Congress on Wednesday, "We don't use cages for children."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist."
--Rep. Bennie Thompson
At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday, Nielsen took questions from Democratic lawmakers enraged over the administration's policies of forcibly separating families to deter future asylum-seekers and locking up migrant children in facilities described as cages by reporters, lawmakers, and immigrant rights advocates.
Since last summer, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained that the U.S. government does not detain migrants in "inhumane fenced cages," despite an abundance of evidence to the contrary. Faced with intense lines of questioning from Democrats on Wednesday, Nielsen stuck to DHS's party line.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the committee's chairman, repeatedly asked Nielsen whether U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an arm of DHS, was "still putting children in cages."
"Sir, we don't use cages for children," Nielsen said. "To my knowledge, CBP never purposely put a child in a cage."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist," declared a visibly frustrated Thompson. The secretary continued to claim, "Sir, they're not cages."
"We're not going to go through the semantics," Thompson told her. "I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages--and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the committee."
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) also grilled Nielsen about federal immigration officials detaining migrant children, asking her how the cages used in detention centers by the Trump administration differed from dog kennels:
WATSON COLEMAN: What does a chain-link fence enclosed into a chamber on a concrete floor represent to you? Is that a cage?
NIELSEN: It's a detention space, ma'am, that you know has existed for decades.
WATSON COLEMAN: Does it differ from the cages you put your dogs in when you let them stay outside? Is it different?
NIELSEN: Yes.
WATSON COLEMAN: In what sense?
NIELSEN: It's larger. It has facilities. It provides room to sit, to stand, to lay down.
WATSON COLEMAN: So did my dog's cage.
Watch:
Critics quickly pushed back against Nielsen's claims, with MSNBC correspondent Jacob Soboroff sharing his report from a facility in Texas last summer:
From Your Site Articles
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.