Mar 05, 2019
After months of outrage over the Trump administration detaining migrant children in "cages," Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen insisted to members of Congress on Wednesday, "We don't use cages for children."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist."
--Rep. Bennie Thompson
At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday, Nielsen took questions from Democratic lawmakers enraged over the administration's policies of forcibly separating families to deter future asylum-seekers and locking up migrant children in facilities described as cages by reporters, lawmakers, and immigrant rights advocates.
Since last summer, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained that the U.S. government does not detain migrants in "inhumane fenced cages," despite an abundance of evidence to the contrary. Faced with intense lines of questioning from Democrats on Wednesday, Nielsen stuck to DHS's party line.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the committee's chairman, repeatedly asked Nielsen whether U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an arm of DHS, was "still putting children in cages."
"Sir, we don't use cages for children," Nielsen said. "To my knowledge, CBP never purposely put a child in a cage."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist," declared a visibly frustrated Thompson. The secretary continued to claim, "Sir, they're not cages."
"We're not going to go through the semantics," Thompson told her. "I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages--and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the committee."
\u201cRep. Bennie Thompson: "We're not going to go through the semantics... I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages \u2013 and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the Committee." https://t.co/xLSgpvpV4L\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1551892145
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) also grilled Nielsen about federal immigration officials detaining migrant children, asking her how the cages used in detention centers by the Trump administration differed from dog kennels:
WATSON COLEMAN: What does a chain-link fence enclosed into a chamber on a concrete floor represent to you? Is that a cage?
NIELSEN: It's a detention space, ma'am, that you know has existed for decades.
WATSON COLEMAN: Does it differ from the cages you put your dogs in when you let them stay outside? Is it different?
NIELSEN: Yes.
WATSON COLEMAN: In what sense?
NIELSEN: It's larger. It has facilities. It provides room to sit, to stand, to lay down.
WATSON COLEMAN: So did my dog's cage.
Watch:
Critics quickly pushed back against Nielsen's claims, with MSNBC correspondent Jacob Soboroff sharing his report from a facility in Texas last summer:
\u201cNielsen just said cages inside Border Patrol processing facilities are different from animal kennels. \n\nThey are not. \n\nAnd I said that immediately after seeing separated kids in them when I joined @kasie on the air this summer.\u201d— Jacob Soboroff (@Jacob Soboroff) 1551891694
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
childrencustoms and border protection (cbp)human rightsimmigrationkirstjen nielsenrefugeesus department of homeland security
After months of outrage over the Trump administration detaining migrant children in "cages," Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen insisted to members of Congress on Wednesday, "We don't use cages for children."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist."
--Rep. Bennie Thompson
At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday, Nielsen took questions from Democratic lawmakers enraged over the administration's policies of forcibly separating families to deter future asylum-seekers and locking up migrant children in facilities described as cages by reporters, lawmakers, and immigrant rights advocates.
Since last summer, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained that the U.S. government does not detain migrants in "inhumane fenced cages," despite an abundance of evidence to the contrary. Faced with intense lines of questioning from Democrats on Wednesday, Nielsen stuck to DHS's party line.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the committee's chairman, repeatedly asked Nielsen whether U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an arm of DHS, was "still putting children in cages."
"Sir, we don't use cages for children," Nielsen said. "To my knowledge, CBP never purposely put a child in a cage."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist," declared a visibly frustrated Thompson. The secretary continued to claim, "Sir, they're not cages."
"We're not going to go through the semantics," Thompson told her. "I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages--and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the committee."
\u201cRep. Bennie Thompson: "We're not going to go through the semantics... I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages \u2013 and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the Committee." https://t.co/xLSgpvpV4L\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1551892145
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) also grilled Nielsen about federal immigration officials detaining migrant children, asking her how the cages used in detention centers by the Trump administration differed from dog kennels:
WATSON COLEMAN: What does a chain-link fence enclosed into a chamber on a concrete floor represent to you? Is that a cage?
NIELSEN: It's a detention space, ma'am, that you know has existed for decades.
WATSON COLEMAN: Does it differ from the cages you put your dogs in when you let them stay outside? Is it different?
NIELSEN: Yes.
WATSON COLEMAN: In what sense?
NIELSEN: It's larger. It has facilities. It provides room to sit, to stand, to lay down.
WATSON COLEMAN: So did my dog's cage.
Watch:
Critics quickly pushed back against Nielsen's claims, with MSNBC correspondent Jacob Soboroff sharing his report from a facility in Texas last summer:
\u201cNielsen just said cages inside Border Patrol processing facilities are different from animal kennels. \n\nThey are not. \n\nAnd I said that immediately after seeing separated kids in them when I joined @kasie on the air this summer.\u201d— Jacob Soboroff (@Jacob Soboroff) 1551891694
After months of outrage over the Trump administration detaining migrant children in "cages," Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen insisted to members of Congress on Wednesday, "We don't use cages for children."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist."
--Rep. Bennie Thompson
At a House Homeland Security Committee hearing on Wednesday, Nielsen took questions from Democratic lawmakers enraged over the administration's policies of forcibly separating families to deter future asylum-seekers and locking up migrant children in facilities described as cages by reporters, lawmakers, and immigrant rights advocates.
Since last summer, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has maintained that the U.S. government does not detain migrants in "inhumane fenced cages," despite an abundance of evidence to the contrary. Faced with intense lines of questioning from Democrats on Wednesday, Nielsen stuck to DHS's party line.
Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), the committee's chairman, repeatedly asked Nielsen whether U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), an arm of DHS, was "still putting children in cages."
"Sir, we don't use cages for children," Nielsen said. "To my knowledge, CBP never purposely put a child in a cage."
"I've seen the cages. I just want you to admit that the cages exist," declared a visibly frustrated Thompson. The secretary continued to claim, "Sir, they're not cages."
"We're not going to go through the semantics," Thompson told her. "I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages--and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the committee."
\u201cRep. Bennie Thompson: "We're not going to go through the semantics... I saw the cyclone fences that were made as cages \u2013 and you did too. All you have to do is admit it. If it's a bad policy, then change it. But don't mislead the Committee." https://t.co/xLSgpvpV4L\u201d— ABC News (@ABC News) 1551892145
Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman (D-N.J.) also grilled Nielsen about federal immigration officials detaining migrant children, asking her how the cages used in detention centers by the Trump administration differed from dog kennels:
WATSON COLEMAN: What does a chain-link fence enclosed into a chamber on a concrete floor represent to you? Is that a cage?
NIELSEN: It's a detention space, ma'am, that you know has existed for decades.
WATSON COLEMAN: Does it differ from the cages you put your dogs in when you let them stay outside? Is it different?
NIELSEN: Yes.
WATSON COLEMAN: In what sense?
NIELSEN: It's larger. It has facilities. It provides room to sit, to stand, to lay down.
WATSON COLEMAN: So did my dog's cage.
Watch:
Critics quickly pushed back against Nielsen's claims, with MSNBC correspondent Jacob Soboroff sharing his report from a facility in Texas last summer:
\u201cNielsen just said cages inside Border Patrol processing facilities are different from animal kennels. \n\nThey are not. \n\nAnd I said that immediately after seeing separated kids in them when I joined @kasie on the air this summer.\u201d— Jacob Soboroff (@Jacob Soboroff) 1551891694
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.