NSA Has Halted Mass Domestic Spying Program First Exposed by Snowden in 2013: GOP Aide

The National Security Agency (NSA) has ended a major domestic spying program, according to a top GOP congressional aide. (Graphic: EFF/Flickr/cc)

NSA Has Halted Mass Domestic Spying Program First Exposed by Snowden in 2013: GOP Aide

"It's time for this mass surveillance program to end permanently," say civil liberties advocates

The U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) has reportedly halted a widely criticized domestic mass surveillance program involving Americans' phone records first exposed by whistleblower Edward Snowden.

The revelation came from Luke Murry, the national security adviser to the House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), on The Lawfare Podcast. His remarks were picked up the the New York Times and quickly spark national attention.

The now-shuttered program that analyzed metadata from phone records--which shows who called or texted whom, and when, but not what is said--replaced a once-secret operation established under Section 215 of the Patriot Act, which Snowden, an ex-intelligence contractor, exposed in 2013.

Murry said that under the Trump administration, the agency "actually hasn't been using it for the past six months because of problems with way in which that information was collected." He added, "I'm not actually certain that the administration will want to start that back up given where they've been six months."

Technical problems with data collection, acknowledged by NSA last summer, forced the agency to purge hundreds of millions of phone and text metadata records collected from American telecommunications companies over three years after realizing that its database included files the NSA was not authorized to receive.

Murry's revelation, as the Timesnoted, comes at an important moment in the fight for privacy:

Congress ended and replaced the program disclosed by Mr. Snowden with the USA Freedom Act of 2015, which will expire in December. Security and privacy advocates have been gearing up for a legislative battle over whether to extend or revise the program--and with what changes, if any.

Daniel Schuman, policy director of the advocacy group Demand Progress, told the Times Murry's disclosure that the program hasn't been used for months "changes the entire landscape of the debate," especially since "the sky hasn't fallen" in its absence.

As he put it: "If there is an ongoing program, even if we all have doubts about it, that's a very different political matter than if the program has actually stopped... Then the question becomes, 'Why restart it?' rather than whether to turn it off."

The NSA, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the National Security Council are remaining tight-lipped about future plans for the program. McCarthy's spokesperson, meanwhile, said that Murry "was not speaking on behalf of administration policy or what Congress intends to do on this issue."

Murry's prediction that the Trump administration won't push for Congress to renew the spying program was cautiously welcomed by privacy advocates. "It's time for this mass surveillance program to end permanently," tweeted the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF).

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) concurred:

The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald was one of the first journalists to work with Snowden to expose the U.S. government's mass spying efforts that began under former President George W. Bush after the 9/11 terrorist attacks and continued under former President Barack Obama. In a Twitter thread late Monday, Greenwald pointed out that Obama and his Director of National Intelligence, James Clapper, had claimed the program was essential to national security.

Given that the program reportedly hasn't thwarted any terrorist attacks and the Trump administration has operated without it for the past six months, he called the situation a "good reminder of how governments lie."

Greenwald, who is also an attorney, further reiterated that "the mass collection of Americans' communications records--done in secrecy, with no democratic or Congressional approval--was a grave violation of the Constitution."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.