Rep. Ilhan Omar, seen here on Feb. 13 during a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing on the political situation in Venezuela. (Screengrab/C-SPAN)
Ilhan Omar Faces Renewed Smears From GOP and Fellow Democrats Over Her Criticism of Israel
"Being opposed to Netanyahu and the occupation is not the same as being anti-Semitic," Omar said Sunday.
A firestorm over comments critical of Israel by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) continued to engulf the Democratic Party and American politics over the weekend.
Omar continues to stand firm in her assertion that criticism of the Israeli occupation does not constitute anti-Semitism. And the blowback she's received from Republicans and Democrats alike sheds light on the absence of questioning over Israel's special treatment in U.S. foreign policy.
The controversy over Omar's criticism of Israel's influence on American politics began on February 11 and hasn't let up since then. Omar endured renewed accusations of anti-Semitism on Friday for remarks made last Wednesday at a Washington bookstore.
"I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is O.K. for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country," Omar reportedly said.
In an opinion piece for the Guardian in February, president of the National Iranian American Council Trita Parsi and historian Stephen Wertheim cautioned against playing into prejudice and racism but noted that "concern about lobbyist influence is legitimate and poised to intensify." Wertheim reconfirmed that position on Sunday.
The Congresswoman posted a Twitter thread Sunday defending herself from attacks over that comment, claiming the criticism was at least primarily based on her opposition to Israeli influence in American politics.
"I have not mischaracterized our relationship with Israel," wrote Omar, "I have questioned it and that has been clear from my end."
Omar pointed out that her willingness to speak out on Israel was generating an avalanche of attacks, primarily from the right, and that those attacks were conflating a perceived otherness to the Congresswoman.
"I am told every day that I am anti-American if I am not pro-Israel," Omar said. "I find that to be problematic and I am not alone."
An African refugee Muslim woman wearing a headscarf, Omar is often subject to right wing attacks, and this past weekend proved no exception. The Congresswoman was a target at the 2019 Conservative Political Action Conference, where provocateurs held a news conference accusing her of traitorous behavior, and in West Virginia, where Omar's election to the House was analogized to 9/11 by state Republicans.
"My Americanness is questioned by the President and the @GOP on a daily basis, yet my colleagues remain silent," said Omar. "I know what it means to be American and no one will ever tell me otherwise."
Attacks on Omar weren't confined to the extremists at CPAC.
New York Times columnist Bret Stephens accused Omar of "classic anti-Semitism" for her alleged "charge of dual loyalty" for American Jews.
Of course, as critics pointed out, Stephens might not be the right messenger for that accusation. While at the Wall Street journal, Stephens once wrote an opinion piece referring to "the disease of the Arab mind"--making him possibly not the best judge of racism on the topic of Israel/Palestine. In an April 2017 interview with Vox, Stephens defended the piece by saying that critics of the column didn't understand his point and were twisting his words.
"I don't think, unless you are actively and willfully trying to twist what I said into something I didn't mean," Stephens said, "that you can read that as in any sense a racist comment or not a fair comment to appear in a major publication."
Right wing Democrats joined the pile on as well. Talking Points Memo writer Josh Marshall tweeted that whether or not Omar's statements came from "misunderstanding or animus," it was hard for him to care at this point. At New York Magazine, Jonathan Chait wrote that "whatever presumption of good faith [Omar] deserved last time should be gone now" (though, as HuffPost reporter Jessica Schulberg pointed out, Chait's column "[misled] readers about the timing of Omar's supposedly anti-Semitic comment").
Some of Omar's fellow Democrats were similarly critical. Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.) criticized Omar on Twitter and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) released a statement calling Omar's statement a "vile anti-Semitic slur."
Other Congressional Democrats, however, showed their support for their fellow member in the face of right wing attacks. Omar "shows us real courage," tweeted Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).
"We got your back," said Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.).
Via Twitter, Omar expressed thanks to supporters on Sunday night and reiterated that her position on Israel was based on policy, not prejudice.
"Being opposed to Netanyahu and the occupation is not the same as being anti-Semitic," Omar wrote. "I am grateful to the many Jewish allies who have spoken out and said the same."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A firestorm over comments critical of Israel by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) continued to engulf the Democratic Party and American politics over the weekend.
Omar continues to stand firm in her assertion that criticism of the Israeli occupation does not constitute anti-Semitism. And the blowback she's received from Republicans and Democrats alike sheds light on the absence of questioning over Israel's special treatment in U.S. foreign policy.
The controversy over Omar's criticism of Israel's influence on American politics began on February 11 and hasn't let up since then. Omar endured renewed accusations of anti-Semitism on Friday for remarks made last Wednesday at a Washington bookstore.
"I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is O.K. for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country," Omar reportedly said.
In an opinion piece for the Guardian in February, president of the National Iranian American Council Trita Parsi and historian Stephen Wertheim cautioned against playing into prejudice and racism but noted that "concern about lobbyist influence is legitimate and poised to intensify." Wertheim reconfirmed that position on Sunday.
The Congresswoman posted a Twitter thread Sunday defending herself from attacks over that comment, claiming the criticism was at least primarily based on her opposition to Israeli influence in American politics.
"I have not mischaracterized our relationship with Israel," wrote Omar, "I have questioned it and that has been clear from my end."
Omar pointed out that her willingness to speak out on Israel was generating an avalanche of attacks, primarily from the right, and that those attacks were conflating a perceived otherness to the Congresswoman.
"I am told every day that I am anti-American if I am not pro-Israel," Omar said. "I find that to be problematic and I am not alone."
An African refugee Muslim woman wearing a headscarf, Omar is often subject to right wing attacks, and this past weekend proved no exception. The Congresswoman was a target at the 2019 Conservative Political Action Conference, where provocateurs held a news conference accusing her of traitorous behavior, and in West Virginia, where Omar's election to the House was analogized to 9/11 by state Republicans.
"My Americanness is questioned by the President and the @GOP on a daily basis, yet my colleagues remain silent," said Omar. "I know what it means to be American and no one will ever tell me otherwise."
Attacks on Omar weren't confined to the extremists at CPAC.
New York Times columnist Bret Stephens accused Omar of "classic anti-Semitism" for her alleged "charge of dual loyalty" for American Jews.
Of course, as critics pointed out, Stephens might not be the right messenger for that accusation. While at the Wall Street journal, Stephens once wrote an opinion piece referring to "the disease of the Arab mind"--making him possibly not the best judge of racism on the topic of Israel/Palestine. In an April 2017 interview with Vox, Stephens defended the piece by saying that critics of the column didn't understand his point and were twisting his words.
"I don't think, unless you are actively and willfully trying to twist what I said into something I didn't mean," Stephens said, "that you can read that as in any sense a racist comment or not a fair comment to appear in a major publication."
Right wing Democrats joined the pile on as well. Talking Points Memo writer Josh Marshall tweeted that whether or not Omar's statements came from "misunderstanding or animus," it was hard for him to care at this point. At New York Magazine, Jonathan Chait wrote that "whatever presumption of good faith [Omar] deserved last time should be gone now" (though, as HuffPost reporter Jessica Schulberg pointed out, Chait's column "[misled] readers about the timing of Omar's supposedly anti-Semitic comment").
Some of Omar's fellow Democrats were similarly critical. Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.) criticized Omar on Twitter and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) released a statement calling Omar's statement a "vile anti-Semitic slur."
Other Congressional Democrats, however, showed their support for their fellow member in the face of right wing attacks. Omar "shows us real courage," tweeted Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).
"We got your back," said Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.).
Via Twitter, Omar expressed thanks to supporters on Sunday night and reiterated that her position on Israel was based on policy, not prejudice.
"Being opposed to Netanyahu and the occupation is not the same as being anti-Semitic," Omar wrote. "I am grateful to the many Jewish allies who have spoken out and said the same."
A firestorm over comments critical of Israel by Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) continued to engulf the Democratic Party and American politics over the weekend.
Omar continues to stand firm in her assertion that criticism of the Israeli occupation does not constitute anti-Semitism. And the blowback she's received from Republicans and Democrats alike sheds light on the absence of questioning over Israel's special treatment in U.S. foreign policy.
The controversy over Omar's criticism of Israel's influence on American politics began on February 11 and hasn't let up since then. Omar endured renewed accusations of anti-Semitism on Friday for remarks made last Wednesday at a Washington bookstore.
"I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says it is O.K. for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country," Omar reportedly said.
In an opinion piece for the Guardian in February, president of the National Iranian American Council Trita Parsi and historian Stephen Wertheim cautioned against playing into prejudice and racism but noted that "concern about lobbyist influence is legitimate and poised to intensify." Wertheim reconfirmed that position on Sunday.
The Congresswoman posted a Twitter thread Sunday defending herself from attacks over that comment, claiming the criticism was at least primarily based on her opposition to Israeli influence in American politics.
"I have not mischaracterized our relationship with Israel," wrote Omar, "I have questioned it and that has been clear from my end."
Omar pointed out that her willingness to speak out on Israel was generating an avalanche of attacks, primarily from the right, and that those attacks were conflating a perceived otherness to the Congresswoman.
"I am told every day that I am anti-American if I am not pro-Israel," Omar said. "I find that to be problematic and I am not alone."
An African refugee Muslim woman wearing a headscarf, Omar is often subject to right wing attacks, and this past weekend proved no exception. The Congresswoman was a target at the 2019 Conservative Political Action Conference, where provocateurs held a news conference accusing her of traitorous behavior, and in West Virginia, where Omar's election to the House was analogized to 9/11 by state Republicans.
"My Americanness is questioned by the President and the @GOP on a daily basis, yet my colleagues remain silent," said Omar. "I know what it means to be American and no one will ever tell me otherwise."
Attacks on Omar weren't confined to the extremists at CPAC.
New York Times columnist Bret Stephens accused Omar of "classic anti-Semitism" for her alleged "charge of dual loyalty" for American Jews.
Of course, as critics pointed out, Stephens might not be the right messenger for that accusation. While at the Wall Street journal, Stephens once wrote an opinion piece referring to "the disease of the Arab mind"--making him possibly not the best judge of racism on the topic of Israel/Palestine. In an April 2017 interview with Vox, Stephens defended the piece by saying that critics of the column didn't understand his point and were twisting his words.
"I don't think, unless you are actively and willfully trying to twist what I said into something I didn't mean," Stephens said, "that you can read that as in any sense a racist comment or not a fair comment to appear in a major publication."
Right wing Democrats joined the pile on as well. Talking Points Memo writer Josh Marshall tweeted that whether or not Omar's statements came from "misunderstanding or animus," it was hard for him to care at this point. At New York Magazine, Jonathan Chait wrote that "whatever presumption of good faith [Omar] deserved last time should be gone now" (though, as HuffPost reporter Jessica Schulberg pointed out, Chait's column "[misled] readers about the timing of Omar's supposedly anti-Semitic comment").
Some of Omar's fellow Democrats were similarly critical. Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-Fla.) criticized Omar on Twitter and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) released a statement calling Omar's statement a "vile anti-Semitic slur."
Other Congressional Democrats, however, showed their support for their fellow member in the face of right wing attacks. Omar "shows us real courage," tweeted Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.).
"We got your back," said Rep. Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.).
Via Twitter, Omar expressed thanks to supporters on Sunday night and reiterated that her position on Israel was based on policy, not prejudice.
"Being opposed to Netanyahu and the occupation is not the same as being anti-Semitic," Omar wrote. "I am grateful to the many Jewish allies who have spoken out and said the same."