SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
President of Iraq Barham Ahmed Salih attends an audience with Pope Francis at the Apostolic Palace on November 24, 2018 in Vatican City, Vatican. (Photo: Franco Origlia/Getty Images)
Trump Says He Wants US Troops in Iraq to "Watch Iran." Iraqis' Response: Get Out
"Trump did not ask us to keep U.S. troops to watch Iran," says Iraqi president. "He didn't ask permission from Congress either," says one observer.
Feb 03, 2019
Baghdad is firing back on Monday with calls to potentially boot U.S. troops out of Iraq in response to President Donald Trump's comments that he wants to keep them there to "watch Iran."
Speaking to CBS's "Face the Nation" in an interview that aired Sunday, Trump said he wants the continued military presence
because I want to be able to watch Iran. We have an unbelievable and expensive military base built in Iraq. It's perfectly situated for looking at all over different parts of the troubled Middle East rather than pulling up. And this is what a lot of people don't understand. We're going to keep watching and we're going to keep seeing and if there's trouble, if somebody is looking to do nuclear weapons or other things, we're going to know it before they do.
But U.S. troops have no right to do that, said Iraqi President Barham Salih, adding that Trump's comments were "surprising."
"Trump did not ask us to keep U.S. troops to watch Iran," Salih said at a forum in Baghdad. The agreement between Washington and Baghdad is for the troops to combat terrorism, he said, and doing otherwise would be "unacceptable."
"The Iraqi constitution rejects the use of Iraq as a base for hitting or attacking a neighboring country," he said.
"The U.S. is a major power ... but do not pursue your own policy priorities, we live here," he stated, and added, "It is of fundamental interest for Iraq to have good relations with Iran" and its other neighbors.
According to NPR, Trump's comments also sparked the ire of Iraq's main militias, who said they could push for a vote in parliament to kick out U.S. troops. The outlet also noted a "growing sentiment" held by Iraqis that U.S. troops should go.
In addition, Agence France-Pressse reports:
Sabah al-Saadi, a member of parliament in the bloc led by influential anti-American Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr, has proposed a bill demanding a U.S. pullout.
Trump's latest remarks had made passing such a law "a national duty."
Deputy speaker of parliament Hassan Karim al-Kaabi, also close to Sadr, said they were a "new provocation," weeks after the U.S. president sparked outrage in Iraq by visiting U.S. troops at Ain al-Asad without meeting a single Iraqi official.
Former Iraq Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi chimed in as well, writing on Twitter: "Iraqi sovereignty must be respected. Its interests should not be compromised. Iraq should not be used as a spring board to attack its neighbors. We are not proxies in conflicts outside the interests of our nation."
Other U.S. based foreign policy observers weighed in as well:
\u201cHe didn't ask permission from Congress either.\u201d— Matt Duss (@Matt Duss) 1549296078
\u201cTrump says he'll keep US troops in Iraq in order to watch Iran nuclear program (!!)\n\nSo instead of having inspectors INSIDE the Iranian program - as provided by the #IranDeal - Trump prefers watching it from miles away, across the border in Iraq.\n\n#Winning\nhttps://t.co/nEuMigcwHh\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1549210969
\u201cThe neocons didn't invade Iraq to establish a democracy, but to establish a client state. Till this day, they can't reconcile with the fact that Iraq has a will of its own.\n\nTrump did not ask permission to 'watch Iran,' Iraqi president says\n https://t.co/aUV7WUf621\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1549287776
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Baghdad is firing back on Monday with calls to potentially boot U.S. troops out of Iraq in response to President Donald Trump's comments that he wants to keep them there to "watch Iran."
Speaking to CBS's "Face the Nation" in an interview that aired Sunday, Trump said he wants the continued military presence
because I want to be able to watch Iran. We have an unbelievable and expensive military base built in Iraq. It's perfectly situated for looking at all over different parts of the troubled Middle East rather than pulling up. And this is what a lot of people don't understand. We're going to keep watching and we're going to keep seeing and if there's trouble, if somebody is looking to do nuclear weapons or other things, we're going to know it before they do.
But U.S. troops have no right to do that, said Iraqi President Barham Salih, adding that Trump's comments were "surprising."
"Trump did not ask us to keep U.S. troops to watch Iran," Salih said at a forum in Baghdad. The agreement between Washington and Baghdad is for the troops to combat terrorism, he said, and doing otherwise would be "unacceptable."
"The Iraqi constitution rejects the use of Iraq as a base for hitting or attacking a neighboring country," he said.
"The U.S. is a major power ... but do not pursue your own policy priorities, we live here," he stated, and added, "It is of fundamental interest for Iraq to have good relations with Iran" and its other neighbors.
According to NPR, Trump's comments also sparked the ire of Iraq's main militias, who said they could push for a vote in parliament to kick out U.S. troops. The outlet also noted a "growing sentiment" held by Iraqis that U.S. troops should go.
In addition, Agence France-Pressse reports:
Sabah al-Saadi, a member of parliament in the bloc led by influential anti-American Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr, has proposed a bill demanding a U.S. pullout.
Trump's latest remarks had made passing such a law "a national duty."
Deputy speaker of parliament Hassan Karim al-Kaabi, also close to Sadr, said they were a "new provocation," weeks after the U.S. president sparked outrage in Iraq by visiting U.S. troops at Ain al-Asad without meeting a single Iraqi official.
Former Iraq Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi chimed in as well, writing on Twitter: "Iraqi sovereignty must be respected. Its interests should not be compromised. Iraq should not be used as a spring board to attack its neighbors. We are not proxies in conflicts outside the interests of our nation."
Other U.S. based foreign policy observers weighed in as well:
\u201cHe didn't ask permission from Congress either.\u201d— Matt Duss (@Matt Duss) 1549296078
\u201cTrump says he'll keep US troops in Iraq in order to watch Iran nuclear program (!!)\n\nSo instead of having inspectors INSIDE the Iranian program - as provided by the #IranDeal - Trump prefers watching it from miles away, across the border in Iraq.\n\n#Winning\nhttps://t.co/nEuMigcwHh\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1549210969
\u201cThe neocons didn't invade Iraq to establish a democracy, but to establish a client state. Till this day, they can't reconcile with the fact that Iraq has a will of its own.\n\nTrump did not ask permission to 'watch Iran,' Iraqi president says\n https://t.co/aUV7WUf621\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1549287776
Baghdad is firing back on Monday with calls to potentially boot U.S. troops out of Iraq in response to President Donald Trump's comments that he wants to keep them there to "watch Iran."
Speaking to CBS's "Face the Nation" in an interview that aired Sunday, Trump said he wants the continued military presence
because I want to be able to watch Iran. We have an unbelievable and expensive military base built in Iraq. It's perfectly situated for looking at all over different parts of the troubled Middle East rather than pulling up. And this is what a lot of people don't understand. We're going to keep watching and we're going to keep seeing and if there's trouble, if somebody is looking to do nuclear weapons or other things, we're going to know it before they do.
But U.S. troops have no right to do that, said Iraqi President Barham Salih, adding that Trump's comments were "surprising."
"Trump did not ask us to keep U.S. troops to watch Iran," Salih said at a forum in Baghdad. The agreement between Washington and Baghdad is for the troops to combat terrorism, he said, and doing otherwise would be "unacceptable."
"The Iraqi constitution rejects the use of Iraq as a base for hitting or attacking a neighboring country," he said.
"The U.S. is a major power ... but do not pursue your own policy priorities, we live here," he stated, and added, "It is of fundamental interest for Iraq to have good relations with Iran" and its other neighbors.
According to NPR, Trump's comments also sparked the ire of Iraq's main militias, who said they could push for a vote in parliament to kick out U.S. troops. The outlet also noted a "growing sentiment" held by Iraqis that U.S. troops should go.
In addition, Agence France-Pressse reports:
Sabah al-Saadi, a member of parliament in the bloc led by influential anti-American Shiite cleric Moqtada Sadr, has proposed a bill demanding a U.S. pullout.
Trump's latest remarks had made passing such a law "a national duty."
Deputy speaker of parliament Hassan Karim al-Kaabi, also close to Sadr, said they were a "new provocation," weeks after the U.S. president sparked outrage in Iraq by visiting U.S. troops at Ain al-Asad without meeting a single Iraqi official.
Former Iraq Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi chimed in as well, writing on Twitter: "Iraqi sovereignty must be respected. Its interests should not be compromised. Iraq should not be used as a spring board to attack its neighbors. We are not proxies in conflicts outside the interests of our nation."
Other U.S. based foreign policy observers weighed in as well:
\u201cHe didn't ask permission from Congress either.\u201d— Matt Duss (@Matt Duss) 1549296078
\u201cTrump says he'll keep US troops in Iraq in order to watch Iran nuclear program (!!)\n\nSo instead of having inspectors INSIDE the Iranian program - as provided by the #IranDeal - Trump prefers watching it from miles away, across the border in Iraq.\n\n#Winning\nhttps://t.co/nEuMigcwHh\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1549210969
\u201cThe neocons didn't invade Iraq to establish a democracy, but to establish a client state. Till this day, they can't reconcile with the fact that Iraq has a will of its own.\n\nTrump did not ask permission to 'watch Iran,' Iraqi president says\n https://t.co/aUV7WUf621\u201d— Trita Parsi (@Trita Parsi) 1549287776
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.