Published on
by

GOP Lawmaker Really Doesn't Want Rep. Rashida Tlaib to Let Lawmakers Know What Life Is Like in Occupied West Bank

Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas) thinks the "mere prospect" of Tlaib's proposed congressional delegation is dangerous to the status quo

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.). Unlike the rite of passage for new Republican and Democratic members of Congress that some dub the "Jewish Disneyland trip"—sponsored by American Israel Education Foundation (AIEF)—the proposed congressional delegation by Tlaib, the first Palestinian-American woman to serve in Congress, would focus on  "Israel's detention of Palestinian children, education, access to clean water, and poverty." (Photo: Rashida Tlaib)

Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.). Unlike the rite of passage for new Republican and Democratic members of Congress that some dub the "Jewish Disneyland trip"—sponsored by American Israel Education Foundation (AIEF)—the proposed congressional delegation by Tlaib, the first Palestinian-American woman to serve in Congress, would focus on  "Israel's detention of Palestinian children, education, access to clean water, and poverty." (Photo: Rashida Tlaib)

Newly-elected Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) wants to offer members of Congress an alternative to the "sugar-coated" junket to Israel the American Israel Public Affairs Committee-affiliated group offers members of Congress by leading a delegation to the West Bank. For a Republican lawmaker, however, giving lawmakers a view of life in the occupied territory is an "exceedingly dangerous" plan that must be stopped.

In letters he sent Thursday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Democratic House committee heads, Rep. Brian Babin (R-Texas) laid out (pdf) his "extreme concern" with Tlaib's proposal, first reported by The Intercept in December.

Unlike the rite of passage for new Republican and Democratic congress members that some dub the "Jewish Disneyland trip"—sponsored by American Israel Education Foundation (AIEF)—the proposed congressional delegation by the first Palestinian-American woman to serve in Congress would focus on  "Israel's detention of Palestinian children, education, access to clean water, and poverty," the news outlet reported at the time.

Her delegation could spotlight Israel's "segregation" and show "how that has really harmed us being able to achieve real peace in that region," Tlaib told The Intercept.

"I don't think AIPAC provides a real, fair lens into this issue," she addded, as it glosses over "the side that I know is real, which is what's happening to my grandmother and what's happening to my family there."

SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT

The media landscape is changing fast

Our news team is changing too as we work hard to bring you the news that matters most.

Change is coming. And we've got it covered.

Babin's letters note that Tlaib is a supporter of the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement and accuses her of having "personal vitriol" towards the president. He dismisses her as a "yet unexperienced and overly caustic member of Congress." He also argues that the "mere prospect" of such a delegation would upend the special relationship between the U.S. and Israel and urges the Democratic leaders to reject any approval for the trip.

According to one Jewish American who walked off his so-called "Birthright" trip, Tlaib's move should be applauded, as the AIPAC-funded trips normalize "endless Israeli occupation."

"Tlaib's trip constitutes a marked shift, and we should welcome it. Congresspeople who join her delegation will see the daily nightmare of the Occupation. They'll learn that Palestinian voices are not inherently dangerous, and that opposing the Occupation shouldn't be controversial — it should be a moral imperative," Elon Glickman, an organizer with IfNotNow, recently argued.

Babin, for his part, has welcomed the internally-condemned decision to move the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and supported legislation including the Israel Anti-Boycott Act, which the ACLU rebuked as "an unconstitutional infringement of core political speech rights."

We want a more open and sharing world.

That's why our content is free. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported.

All of our original content is published under Creative Commons—allowing (and encouraging) our articles to be republished freely anywhere. In addition to the traffic and reach our content generates on our site, the multiplying impact of our work is huge and growing as our articles flourish across the Internet and are republished by other large and small online and print outlets around the world.

Several times a year we run brief campaigns to ask our readers to pitch in—and thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Our 2019 Mid-Year Campaign is underway. Can you help? We can't do it without you.

Share This Article