Bianey Reyes and others protest the separation of children from their parents in front of the El Paso Processing Center, an immigration detention facility, at the Mexican border on June 19, 2018 in El Paso, Texas. (Photo: Joe Raedle/Getty Images)
Dec 25, 2018
As Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced that it would order medical checks for all minors in its custody following the deaths of at least two children in recent weeks, critics expressed alarm at the neglect that children have faced in immigrant detention centers thus far--and issued reminders that they shouldn't be detained, especially for long periods of time, in the first place.
The CBP's announcement came a day after the death of an eight-year-old boy, Felipe Gomez Alonzo, was announced on Christmas. Felipe had been held for a week after being apprehended with his father by the agency. The pair had been transferred a number of times as the Trump administration sought to deport them, and the boy grew increasingly ill during the detention, developing a 103 degree fever at one point, but his symptoms were diagnosed as the common cold.
The agency is now "considering options for surge medical assistance" to care for the tens of thousands of children who have been held in U.S. custody this year after crossing the border--but critics pointed out that the overarching concern is that children shouldn't be held by the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and Health and Human Services (HHS) for days, weeks, and months at a time.
\u201cBorder patrol now saying they\u2019ll perform mandatory secondary health checks on children under ten, but WHY ARE THEY JAILING CHILDREN UNDER TEN?! https://t.co/SDuXs4JPG3\u201d— Scott Hechinger (@Scott Hechinger) 1545832584
"The Trump administration's policies of cruelty toward migrants and asylum-seekers at the border must cease immediately before any more children are harmed," said Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA, in a statement.
Daily Beast editor Justin Miller suggested on Twitter that regardless of the specifics of where and why each child is being detained, a national debate over how to best treat children, adults, and families in U.S. detention is a sign that President Donald Trump's treatment of immigrants and asylum-seekers has spiraled out of control.
In the case of Felipe and his father, Miller wrote, "It was civil detention apparently pending a court date for removal. In other cases (non-families), it's straight to criminal prosecution. Either way, the debate is around improving detention, not whether to detain and en masse."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
childrencustoms and border protection (cbp)human rightsimmigrationus department of homeland security
As Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced that it would order medical checks for all minors in its custody following the deaths of at least two children in recent weeks, critics expressed alarm at the neglect that children have faced in immigrant detention centers thus far--and issued reminders that they shouldn't be detained, especially for long periods of time, in the first place.
The CBP's announcement came a day after the death of an eight-year-old boy, Felipe Gomez Alonzo, was announced on Christmas. Felipe had been held for a week after being apprehended with his father by the agency. The pair had been transferred a number of times as the Trump administration sought to deport them, and the boy grew increasingly ill during the detention, developing a 103 degree fever at one point, but his symptoms were diagnosed as the common cold.
The agency is now "considering options for surge medical assistance" to care for the tens of thousands of children who have been held in U.S. custody this year after crossing the border--but critics pointed out that the overarching concern is that children shouldn't be held by the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and Health and Human Services (HHS) for days, weeks, and months at a time.
\u201cBorder patrol now saying they\u2019ll perform mandatory secondary health checks on children under ten, but WHY ARE THEY JAILING CHILDREN UNDER TEN?! https://t.co/SDuXs4JPG3\u201d— Scott Hechinger (@Scott Hechinger) 1545832584
"The Trump administration's policies of cruelty toward migrants and asylum-seekers at the border must cease immediately before any more children are harmed," said Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA, in a statement.
Daily Beast editor Justin Miller suggested on Twitter that regardless of the specifics of where and why each child is being detained, a national debate over how to best treat children, adults, and families in U.S. detention is a sign that President Donald Trump's treatment of immigrants and asylum-seekers has spiraled out of control.
In the case of Felipe and his father, Miller wrote, "It was civil detention apparently pending a court date for removal. In other cases (non-families), it's straight to criminal prosecution. Either way, the debate is around improving detention, not whether to detain and en masse."
As Customs and Border Protection (CBP) announced that it would order medical checks for all minors in its custody following the deaths of at least two children in recent weeks, critics expressed alarm at the neglect that children have faced in immigrant detention centers thus far--and issued reminders that they shouldn't be detained, especially for long periods of time, in the first place.
The CBP's announcement came a day after the death of an eight-year-old boy, Felipe Gomez Alonzo, was announced on Christmas. Felipe had been held for a week after being apprehended with his father by the agency. The pair had been transferred a number of times as the Trump administration sought to deport them, and the boy grew increasingly ill during the detention, developing a 103 degree fever at one point, but his symptoms were diagnosed as the common cold.
The agency is now "considering options for surge medical assistance" to care for the tens of thousands of children who have been held in U.S. custody this year after crossing the border--but critics pointed out that the overarching concern is that children shouldn't be held by the Departments of Homeland Security (DHS) and Health and Human Services (HHS) for days, weeks, and months at a time.
\u201cBorder patrol now saying they\u2019ll perform mandatory secondary health checks on children under ten, but WHY ARE THEY JAILING CHILDREN UNDER TEN?! https://t.co/SDuXs4JPG3\u201d— Scott Hechinger (@Scott Hechinger) 1545832584
"The Trump administration's policies of cruelty toward migrants and asylum-seekers at the border must cease immediately before any more children are harmed," said Margaret Huang, executive director of Amnesty International USA, in a statement.
Daily Beast editor Justin Miller suggested on Twitter that regardless of the specifics of where and why each child is being detained, a national debate over how to best treat children, adults, and families in U.S. detention is a sign that President Donald Trump's treatment of immigrants and asylum-seekers has spiraled out of control.
In the case of Felipe and his father, Miller wrote, "It was civil detention apparently pending a court date for removal. In other cases (non-families), it's straight to criminal prosecution. Either way, the debate is around improving detention, not whether to detain and en masse."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.