SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
U.S. Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta reached a deal with Jeffrey Epstein, an alleged serial child molester and associate of President Donald Trump's, allowing Epstein to walk free. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/Flickr/cc)
For Allowing Serial Sexual Abuser to Escape Justice, Demand Surges for Labor Secretary Acosta's Immediate Resignation
"While Acosta's record covering up for a depraved plutocrat makes him a good fit for the Trump administration, it should disqualify him from public service."
Dec 06, 2018
One of the nation's leading women's rights organizations joined a number of political commentators on Friday in demanding to know: How does Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta, who was accused last week in an in-depth investigative article by the Miami Herald of helping a serial sexual abuser secure a lenient plea deal, still have a job?
The sexual abuse charges brought against Jeffrey Epstein--a hedge fund manager who counts President Donald Trump and former President Bill Clinton among his friends--"could have resulted in Epstein spending the rest of his life in prison," said Toni Van Pelt, president of the National Organization for Women (NOW). "But instead, he played 'let's make a deal' to subvert justice and escape punishment. Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, who as U.S. Attorney in Miami cut the deal with Epstein, must resign."
The Herald's year-long investigation revealed that in 2007, Acosta helped Epstein to secure a plea bargain that included just 13 months in a county jail and a non-prosecution agreement after being indicted for "assembling a large, cult-like network" of dozens of underage girls and coercing them into sexual activity.
"Epstein's ability to evade justice is of a piece with the elite impunity that Trump pretended to challenge, but actually embodies." --Michelle Goldberg
The non-prosecution agreement Acosta agreed to effectively ended an FBI probe into Epstein's actions, and contrary to federal law, the deal was kept from the girls he had abused--details of the case which Van Pelt argued demonstrate that Acosta played a key role in affording Epstein the same coddling treatment that has been afforded other powerful abusers.
"Jeffrey Epstein plays by the same rule book as Donald Trump, Les Moonves, Harvey Weinstein, Eric Schneiderman, and other powerful men who have been revealed as serial abusers of women," Van Pelt said. "Epstein's scant 13-month stay in a county jail--where he was even allowed to spend twelve hours a day, six days a week, at his office--was made possible by a culture of powerful men enabling each other, while dismissing, excusing, or demeaning the women and children they brutalize with physical and sexual violence."
In the New York Times, Michelle Goldberg published an editorial this week with the succinct headline, "Why Does Alex Acosta Still Have a Job?"
The fact that the labor secretary is responsible for combating human trafficking, Goldberg noted, is just one cause for outrage in the Acosta case.
Acosta's agreement with Epstein "should end his career," Goldberg wrote. "The story might have been overshadowed by last week's cascading revelations in the Trump-Russia scandal, or the news that acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker knew of numerous fraud complaints against a company he advised, to take just two examples of administration lawlessness. But while Acosta's record covering up for a depraved plutocrat makes him a good fit for the Trump administration, it should disqualify him from public service."
The editorial staff of the Herald agreed, writing that Acosta is "damaged goods" due to his deal with "the devil Epstein."
"He should realize it and move on," wrote Nancy Ancrum and Luisa Yane at the Herald. "He does not deserve to be in the halls of power--he abused his power so tragically."
Some applauded Penny Nance, head of the conservative group Concerned Women for America, for becoming the first right-wing figure to add her voice to the call for Acosta's immediate resignation--but many on social media took issue with her assertion that Trump "would not have nominated Acosta" if reports of the deal had come out earlier.
"If Acosta is still part of the administration next month" after Democrats take control of the House, Goldberg wrote, "there should be hearings into his handling of the Epstein case. Epstein's ability to evade justice is of a piece with the elite impunity that Trump pretended to challenge, but actually embodies. Congress can send a message: Time's up."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
One of the nation's leading women's rights organizations joined a number of political commentators on Friday in demanding to know: How does Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta, who was accused last week in an in-depth investigative article by the Miami Herald of helping a serial sexual abuser secure a lenient plea deal, still have a job?
The sexual abuse charges brought against Jeffrey Epstein--a hedge fund manager who counts President Donald Trump and former President Bill Clinton among his friends--"could have resulted in Epstein spending the rest of his life in prison," said Toni Van Pelt, president of the National Organization for Women (NOW). "But instead, he played 'let's make a deal' to subvert justice and escape punishment. Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, who as U.S. Attorney in Miami cut the deal with Epstein, must resign."
The Herald's year-long investigation revealed that in 2007, Acosta helped Epstein to secure a plea bargain that included just 13 months in a county jail and a non-prosecution agreement after being indicted for "assembling a large, cult-like network" of dozens of underage girls and coercing them into sexual activity.
"Epstein's ability to evade justice is of a piece with the elite impunity that Trump pretended to challenge, but actually embodies." --Michelle Goldberg
The non-prosecution agreement Acosta agreed to effectively ended an FBI probe into Epstein's actions, and contrary to federal law, the deal was kept from the girls he had abused--details of the case which Van Pelt argued demonstrate that Acosta played a key role in affording Epstein the same coddling treatment that has been afforded other powerful abusers.
"Jeffrey Epstein plays by the same rule book as Donald Trump, Les Moonves, Harvey Weinstein, Eric Schneiderman, and other powerful men who have been revealed as serial abusers of women," Van Pelt said. "Epstein's scant 13-month stay in a county jail--where he was even allowed to spend twelve hours a day, six days a week, at his office--was made possible by a culture of powerful men enabling each other, while dismissing, excusing, or demeaning the women and children they brutalize with physical and sexual violence."
In the New York Times, Michelle Goldberg published an editorial this week with the succinct headline, "Why Does Alex Acosta Still Have a Job?"
The fact that the labor secretary is responsible for combating human trafficking, Goldberg noted, is just one cause for outrage in the Acosta case.
Acosta's agreement with Epstein "should end his career," Goldberg wrote. "The story might have been overshadowed by last week's cascading revelations in the Trump-Russia scandal, or the news that acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker knew of numerous fraud complaints against a company he advised, to take just two examples of administration lawlessness. But while Acosta's record covering up for a depraved plutocrat makes him a good fit for the Trump administration, it should disqualify him from public service."
The editorial staff of the Herald agreed, writing that Acosta is "damaged goods" due to his deal with "the devil Epstein."
"He should realize it and move on," wrote Nancy Ancrum and Luisa Yane at the Herald. "He does not deserve to be in the halls of power--he abused his power so tragically."
Some applauded Penny Nance, head of the conservative group Concerned Women for America, for becoming the first right-wing figure to add her voice to the call for Acosta's immediate resignation--but many on social media took issue with her assertion that Trump "would not have nominated Acosta" if reports of the deal had come out earlier.
"If Acosta is still part of the administration next month" after Democrats take control of the House, Goldberg wrote, "there should be hearings into his handling of the Epstein case. Epstein's ability to evade justice is of a piece with the elite impunity that Trump pretended to challenge, but actually embodies. Congress can send a message: Time's up."
One of the nation's leading women's rights organizations joined a number of political commentators on Friday in demanding to know: How does Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta, who was accused last week in an in-depth investigative article by the Miami Herald of helping a serial sexual abuser secure a lenient plea deal, still have a job?
The sexual abuse charges brought against Jeffrey Epstein--a hedge fund manager who counts President Donald Trump and former President Bill Clinton among his friends--"could have resulted in Epstein spending the rest of his life in prison," said Toni Van Pelt, president of the National Organization for Women (NOW). "But instead, he played 'let's make a deal' to subvert justice and escape punishment. Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, who as U.S. Attorney in Miami cut the deal with Epstein, must resign."
The Herald's year-long investigation revealed that in 2007, Acosta helped Epstein to secure a plea bargain that included just 13 months in a county jail and a non-prosecution agreement after being indicted for "assembling a large, cult-like network" of dozens of underage girls and coercing them into sexual activity.
"Epstein's ability to evade justice is of a piece with the elite impunity that Trump pretended to challenge, but actually embodies." --Michelle Goldberg
The non-prosecution agreement Acosta agreed to effectively ended an FBI probe into Epstein's actions, and contrary to federal law, the deal was kept from the girls he had abused--details of the case which Van Pelt argued demonstrate that Acosta played a key role in affording Epstein the same coddling treatment that has been afforded other powerful abusers.
"Jeffrey Epstein plays by the same rule book as Donald Trump, Les Moonves, Harvey Weinstein, Eric Schneiderman, and other powerful men who have been revealed as serial abusers of women," Van Pelt said. "Epstein's scant 13-month stay in a county jail--where he was even allowed to spend twelve hours a day, six days a week, at his office--was made possible by a culture of powerful men enabling each other, while dismissing, excusing, or demeaning the women and children they brutalize with physical and sexual violence."
In the New York Times, Michelle Goldberg published an editorial this week with the succinct headline, "Why Does Alex Acosta Still Have a Job?"
The fact that the labor secretary is responsible for combating human trafficking, Goldberg noted, is just one cause for outrage in the Acosta case.
Acosta's agreement with Epstein "should end his career," Goldberg wrote. "The story might have been overshadowed by last week's cascading revelations in the Trump-Russia scandal, or the news that acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker knew of numerous fraud complaints against a company he advised, to take just two examples of administration lawlessness. But while Acosta's record covering up for a depraved plutocrat makes him a good fit for the Trump administration, it should disqualify him from public service."
The editorial staff of the Herald agreed, writing that Acosta is "damaged goods" due to his deal with "the devil Epstein."
"He should realize it and move on," wrote Nancy Ancrum and Luisa Yane at the Herald. "He does not deserve to be in the halls of power--he abused his power so tragically."
Some applauded Penny Nance, head of the conservative group Concerned Women for America, for becoming the first right-wing figure to add her voice to the call for Acosta's immediate resignation--but many on social media took issue with her assertion that Trump "would not have nominated Acosta" if reports of the deal had come out earlier.
"If Acosta is still part of the administration next month" after Democrats take control of the House, Goldberg wrote, "there should be hearings into his handling of the Epstein case. Epstein's ability to evade justice is of a piece with the elite impunity that Trump pretended to challenge, but actually embodies. Congress can send a message: Time's up."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.