SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Members of a caravan of Central Americans who spent weeks traveling across Mexico walk from Mexico to the U.S. side of the border to ask authorities for asylum on April 29, 2018 in Tijuana, Baja California Norte, Mexico. (Photo: David McNew/Getty Images)
'No Agreement of Any Kind': Incoming Mexican Government Denies Cutting Deal With Trump to Keep Asylum Seekers Out of US
The future Mexican government's insistence that no deal has been reached came as the U.S. president appeared to tout the reported agreement on Twitter
Nov 24, 2018
Hours after the Washington Post reported that the Trump White House and the incoming administration of Mexican President-elect Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) cut a deal to keep asylum seekers in Mexico while their claims are processed by the U.S., Mexican government officials on Saturday straightforwardly denied that any such agreement has been reached.
"There is no agreement of any kind between the future federal government of Mexico and the United States of America," future Interior Minister Olga Sanchez told NBC News. "The new government will begin its mandate on December 1."
Jesus Ramirez Cuevas, a spokesperson for AMLO, also denied that the incoming government has reached a deal with the Trump administration.
The future Mexican government's insistence that there is no agreement with the U.S. came as President Donald Trump appeared to address the reported deal on Twitter, writing, "Migrants at the Southern Border will not be allowed into the United States until their claims are individually approved in court."
"All will stay in Mexico. If for any reason it becomes necessary, we will close our Southern Border," Trump added.
While the precise terms of the plan reported by the Post remain unclear, Alison Parker--the director of U.S. programs at Human Rights Watch--decried the broad scope of the Trump administration's attempted policy change as "a pathetic attempt by the U.S. to shirk responsibility" for providing refuge to those fleeing violence and persecution that has often been sparked by American foreign policy.
"With this new policy, once again the U.S. has started a race to the bottom when it comes to human rights," Parker continued. "This is likely to push people fleeing for their lives into riskier attempts to find safety, including using criminal human smugglers who will gain power under this new policy."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Hours after the Washington Post reported that the Trump White House and the incoming administration of Mexican President-elect Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) cut a deal to keep asylum seekers in Mexico while their claims are processed by the U.S., Mexican government officials on Saturday straightforwardly denied that any such agreement has been reached.
"There is no agreement of any kind between the future federal government of Mexico and the United States of America," future Interior Minister Olga Sanchez told NBC News. "The new government will begin its mandate on December 1."
Jesus Ramirez Cuevas, a spokesperson for AMLO, also denied that the incoming government has reached a deal with the Trump administration.
The future Mexican government's insistence that there is no agreement with the U.S. came as President Donald Trump appeared to address the reported deal on Twitter, writing, "Migrants at the Southern Border will not be allowed into the United States until their claims are individually approved in court."
"All will stay in Mexico. If for any reason it becomes necessary, we will close our Southern Border," Trump added.
While the precise terms of the plan reported by the Post remain unclear, Alison Parker--the director of U.S. programs at Human Rights Watch--decried the broad scope of the Trump administration's attempted policy change as "a pathetic attempt by the U.S. to shirk responsibility" for providing refuge to those fleeing violence and persecution that has often been sparked by American foreign policy.
"With this new policy, once again the U.S. has started a race to the bottom when it comes to human rights," Parker continued. "This is likely to push people fleeing for their lives into riskier attempts to find safety, including using criminal human smugglers who will gain power under this new policy."
Hours after the Washington Post reported that the Trump White House and the incoming administration of Mexican President-elect Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador (AMLO) cut a deal to keep asylum seekers in Mexico while their claims are processed by the U.S., Mexican government officials on Saturday straightforwardly denied that any such agreement has been reached.
"There is no agreement of any kind between the future federal government of Mexico and the United States of America," future Interior Minister Olga Sanchez told NBC News. "The new government will begin its mandate on December 1."
Jesus Ramirez Cuevas, a spokesperson for AMLO, also denied that the incoming government has reached a deal with the Trump administration.
The future Mexican government's insistence that there is no agreement with the U.S. came as President Donald Trump appeared to address the reported deal on Twitter, writing, "Migrants at the Southern Border will not be allowed into the United States until their claims are individually approved in court."
"All will stay in Mexico. If for any reason it becomes necessary, we will close our Southern Border," Trump added.
While the precise terms of the plan reported by the Post remain unclear, Alison Parker--the director of U.S. programs at Human Rights Watch--decried the broad scope of the Trump administration's attempted policy change as "a pathetic attempt by the U.S. to shirk responsibility" for providing refuge to those fleeing violence and persecution that has often been sparked by American foreign policy.
"With this new policy, once again the U.S. has started a race to the bottom when it comes to human rights," Parker continued. "This is likely to push people fleeing for their lives into riskier attempts to find safety, including using criminal human smugglers who will gain power under this new policy."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.