Nov 06, 2018
While rejoicing over Oregon voters' decisive rejection of a measure that would have left low-income residents and state employees without abortion coverage, reproductive rights advocates prepared for battles in two red states where extremist anti-choice proposals were passed on Tuesday night.
In Alabama, the passage of Amendment 2 will give a fetus the same right to life held by a person under the state constitution, paving the way to criminalize abortion with a "trigger ban" like the ones that exist in Louisiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, and South Dakota, should the Supreme Court overturn Roe vs. Wade. Access to contraception and the morning-after pill could also be restricted as a result.
The amendment passed by 18 points, with Alabama voters supporting a proposal that made no mention of exceptions in which a woman's right to abortion care would trump the rights of a fetus, like in cases involving rape, incest, or risks to a pregnant woman's life.
\u201cIn Alabama, #Amendment2 passed, granting full legal rights to fertilized eggs while laying the groundwork to strip women of their legal right to make their own reproductive decisions.\n\nhttps://t.co/z95ded4vmx\u201d— Rewire News Group (@Rewire News Group) 1541563169
"This amendment is so far-reaching that it would allow the state to prosecute women for using IUDs, emergency contraception, and IVF or even for missing prenatal care appointments or not being able to leave an abusive partner," said the National Abortion Federation (NAF) in a statement after the amendment passed. "Instead of protecting Alabama women and families, Amendment 2 jeopardizes their health and well-being."
West Virginia voters narrowly voted in favor of another trigger ban--Amendment 1, stating that a woman's right to abortion is not protected under the state constitution and barring state health insurance plans from covering the medical procedure.
\u201cBREAKING: West Virginia has passed Amendment 1, removing reproductive rights protections from the state constitution & banning people from using their public employee or state assistance health insurance to cover their abortion care https://t.co/7ex9J5QDGL #ElectionNight\u201d— NAF (@NAF) 1541564919
\u201cWithholding coverage for abortion care creates profound hardships for women & families, particularly for those who already face significant barriers to receiving high-quality health care. We hear about this devastating impact every day from women calling our Hotline. #VoteNoOn1WV\u201d— NAF (@NAF) 1541564919
Meanwhile, pro-choice groups celebrated Oregon's rejection of Measure 106, which also would have cut abortion coverage for public employees and women who use Medicaid by banning the use of state funds for abortion care.
"Fortunately, Oregonians saw through this thinly-veiled attempt to restrict women's access to abortion care and protected the rights of women and their families to make private medical decisions without government interference," said the NAF. "A right is not a right if you can not afford to access it."
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.