

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

"By omitting reproductive rights from its annual Human Rights Reports, the administration is further signaling that it does not recognize women's rights as human rights," said Rep. Nita Lowey, (D-N.Y.). (Photo: Marc Nozell/flickr/cc)
Trump's State Department this week is facing backlash and calls to reverse course on its decision to omit from its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices the entire reproductive rights section and to weaken its reporting on gender-based violence--a decision critics said amounted to showing that women and girls' "rights don't matter" to the current administration.
With their eyes on preventing the upcoming 2018 reports from containing the same "highly problematic" omissions as the 2017 ones, nearly 100 civil society organizations (pdf) and 129 members of Congress (pdf) sent letters to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo demanding the inclusion of information on denials of these fundamental human rights, including lack of access to contraception, unsafe abortion, and violence in accessing healthcare services.
"The U.S. cannot turn its back on the countless women around the world who are deprived of basic reproductive rights," said Rep. Nita Lowey, (D-N.Y.) the ranking member on the House Appropriations Committee and its Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations. "And yet, that's exactly what the State Department is doing. By omitting reproductive rights from its annual Human Rights Reports, the administration is further signaling that it does not recognize women's rights as human rights. I urge the administration to reverse its decision and to maintain U.S. leadership on behalf of the world's women."
"Governments do not get to pick and choose whose rights will be respected," added Center for Reproductive Rights president and CEO Nancy Northup. "Access to reproductive healthcare has been recognized as a protected human right impacting women's right to life, health, equality, non-discrimination, and freedom from cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. The deletion of the reproductive rights section from the State Department's annual Human Rights Reports is an unacceptable regression in the United States' commitment to women and girls' rights globally."
The letter from the civil society groups, including Human Rights Watch, the International AIDS Society, and Refugees International, said the 2017 reported signaled "a dangerous backslide in the United States' commitment to women's rights abroad." It added:
The government's failure to report on these rights violations conveys a callous disregard for their impact on women and girls. Furthermore, it calls into question the administration's commitment to established human rights norms that recognize government obligations to end such violations.
Given what is a clear "benchmark" for compiling such reports, the letter from the lawmakers demands answers within a 30-day period to questions regarding "the department's reasoning and justification behind the decision" and "which officials ultimately made the decision." It also asks: "Does the department plan to remove, or have officers been instructed to remove, reporting on women's rights, the rights of LGBTI individuals, or any other previously included subsection from the 2018 Human Rights Reports or related submissions?"
Signatory Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), for her part, said she was "appalled" by the shift of Trump's State Department in its yearly assessment of global human rights, and said it "sends a clear message: the Trump Administration does not value the health and rights of women and girls around the world." She noted, "Government and private sector agencies rely on this information to prevent human rights abuses and inform funding decisions on family planning and other programs."
"I urge Secretary Pompeo to stand up for women's rights across the globe and reverse this counterproductive decision," she added.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Trump's State Department this week is facing backlash and calls to reverse course on its decision to omit from its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices the entire reproductive rights section and to weaken its reporting on gender-based violence--a decision critics said amounted to showing that women and girls' "rights don't matter" to the current administration.
With their eyes on preventing the upcoming 2018 reports from containing the same "highly problematic" omissions as the 2017 ones, nearly 100 civil society organizations (pdf) and 129 members of Congress (pdf) sent letters to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo demanding the inclusion of information on denials of these fundamental human rights, including lack of access to contraception, unsafe abortion, and violence in accessing healthcare services.
"The U.S. cannot turn its back on the countless women around the world who are deprived of basic reproductive rights," said Rep. Nita Lowey, (D-N.Y.) the ranking member on the House Appropriations Committee and its Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations. "And yet, that's exactly what the State Department is doing. By omitting reproductive rights from its annual Human Rights Reports, the administration is further signaling that it does not recognize women's rights as human rights. I urge the administration to reverse its decision and to maintain U.S. leadership on behalf of the world's women."
"Governments do not get to pick and choose whose rights will be respected," added Center for Reproductive Rights president and CEO Nancy Northup. "Access to reproductive healthcare has been recognized as a protected human right impacting women's right to life, health, equality, non-discrimination, and freedom from cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. The deletion of the reproductive rights section from the State Department's annual Human Rights Reports is an unacceptable regression in the United States' commitment to women and girls' rights globally."
The letter from the civil society groups, including Human Rights Watch, the International AIDS Society, and Refugees International, said the 2017 reported signaled "a dangerous backslide in the United States' commitment to women's rights abroad." It added:
The government's failure to report on these rights violations conveys a callous disregard for their impact on women and girls. Furthermore, it calls into question the administration's commitment to established human rights norms that recognize government obligations to end such violations.
Given what is a clear "benchmark" for compiling such reports, the letter from the lawmakers demands answers within a 30-day period to questions regarding "the department's reasoning and justification behind the decision" and "which officials ultimately made the decision." It also asks: "Does the department plan to remove, or have officers been instructed to remove, reporting on women's rights, the rights of LGBTI individuals, or any other previously included subsection from the 2018 Human Rights Reports or related submissions?"
Signatory Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), for her part, said she was "appalled" by the shift of Trump's State Department in its yearly assessment of global human rights, and said it "sends a clear message: the Trump Administration does not value the health and rights of women and girls around the world." She noted, "Government and private sector agencies rely on this information to prevent human rights abuses and inform funding decisions on family planning and other programs."
"I urge Secretary Pompeo to stand up for women's rights across the globe and reverse this counterproductive decision," she added.
Trump's State Department this week is facing backlash and calls to reverse course on its decision to omit from its annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices the entire reproductive rights section and to weaken its reporting on gender-based violence--a decision critics said amounted to showing that women and girls' "rights don't matter" to the current administration.
With their eyes on preventing the upcoming 2018 reports from containing the same "highly problematic" omissions as the 2017 ones, nearly 100 civil society organizations (pdf) and 129 members of Congress (pdf) sent letters to Secretary of State Mike Pompeo demanding the inclusion of information on denials of these fundamental human rights, including lack of access to contraception, unsafe abortion, and violence in accessing healthcare services.
"The U.S. cannot turn its back on the countless women around the world who are deprived of basic reproductive rights," said Rep. Nita Lowey, (D-N.Y.) the ranking member on the House Appropriations Committee and its Subcommittee on State and Foreign Operations. "And yet, that's exactly what the State Department is doing. By omitting reproductive rights from its annual Human Rights Reports, the administration is further signaling that it does not recognize women's rights as human rights. I urge the administration to reverse its decision and to maintain U.S. leadership on behalf of the world's women."
"Governments do not get to pick and choose whose rights will be respected," added Center for Reproductive Rights president and CEO Nancy Northup. "Access to reproductive healthcare has been recognized as a protected human right impacting women's right to life, health, equality, non-discrimination, and freedom from cruel, inhumane and degrading treatment. The deletion of the reproductive rights section from the State Department's annual Human Rights Reports is an unacceptable regression in the United States' commitment to women and girls' rights globally."
The letter from the civil society groups, including Human Rights Watch, the International AIDS Society, and Refugees International, said the 2017 reported signaled "a dangerous backslide in the United States' commitment to women's rights abroad." It added:
The government's failure to report on these rights violations conveys a callous disregard for their impact on women and girls. Furthermore, it calls into question the administration's commitment to established human rights norms that recognize government obligations to end such violations.
Given what is a clear "benchmark" for compiling such reports, the letter from the lawmakers demands answers within a 30-day period to questions regarding "the department's reasoning and justification behind the decision" and "which officials ultimately made the decision." It also asks: "Does the department plan to remove, or have officers been instructed to remove, reporting on women's rights, the rights of LGBTI individuals, or any other previously included subsection from the 2018 Human Rights Reports or related submissions?"
Signatory Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), for her part, said she was "appalled" by the shift of Trump's State Department in its yearly assessment of global human rights, and said it "sends a clear message: the Trump Administration does not value the health and rights of women and girls around the world." She noted, "Government and private sector agencies rely on this information to prevent human rights abuses and inform funding decisions on family planning and other programs."
"I urge Secretary Pompeo to stand up for women's rights across the globe and reverse this counterproductive decision," she added.