SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
While there is not one single female Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC), the male GOP members on the committee have made it abundantly clear they do not look forward to the optics of their cross-examination of Christine Blasey Ford on Thursday when the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault is scheduled to testify in a public hearing.
There Are No Women on the GOP's Side of the Senate Judiciary Committee, So They've Hired One to Grill Christine Blasey Ford For Them
"By hiring a private attorney to cross-examine Dr. Blasey Ford," said Sen. Kamala Harris, "Republicans are trying to intimidate her and avoid being held accountable by voters."
Sep 25, 2018
While there is not one single female Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC), the male GOP members on the committee have made it abundantly clear they do not look forward to the optics of their cross-examination of Christine Blasey Ford on Thursday when the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault is scheduled to testify in a public hearing.
According to NBC News, a letter sent to members of the committee on Tuesday by committee staffer Mike Davis said the GOP had hired a woman whom he described as "an experienced sex-crimes prosecutor to serve as an investigative staff counsel for the hearing." Notably, in the wake of Ford coming forward with her credible accusations last week, it was Davis who tweeted that Republicans were "unfazed and determined" to "confirm Judge Kavanaugh."
In response to the development, Sen. Kamala Harris, one of the four Democratic female members of the committee, stated, "Dr. Blasey Ford isn't on trial. This hearing is to determine whether Kavanaugh is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. By hiring a private attorney to cross-examine Dr. Blasey Ford, Republicans are trying to intimidate her and avoid being held accountable by voters."
Republicans have said they will not name the person they have hired.
Later on Tuesday, Sen. Chuck Grassley (D-Iowa), chair of the committee, announced that he had scheduled a vote for Kavanaugh for Friday morning.
As the Huffington Post reports:
There's a simple reason Republicans are doing this: Every GOP senator on the committee is male, and they don't want to be seen as bullying a woman who is speaking out about being sexually assaulted as a teenager.
"There's no particular expertise that a questioner is going to have in this situation," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). "Why are my colleagues hiding from their role as members of the Judiciary Committee?"
The woman they've hired as counsel is a prosecutor with expertise in sex crimes. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of the committee, said he is not releasing the woman's name because he is concerned for her safety. He said the public probably won't know the person's identity prior to the hearing.
"We have done it because we want to depoliticize the whole process like the Democrats politicized the Anita Hill thing," Grassley said.
Following the announcement, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who does not serve on the SJC, told reporters Tuesday afternoon that it would be unwise for male GOP senators to ask Ford questions directly during the hearing. "Somebody will do something that you guys will run 24/7 and inadvertently somebody will do something that's insensitive," Corker said. "I would not be wanting to ask questions about something like this. I'm glad they're going to get outside counsel."
But that doesn't make sense. What could a Republican ever ask a woman, or say about a woman, who says she has survived a sexual assault that would be insensitive?
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
anita hillchristine blasey fordkamala harrisrepublican partysexual assaultus senateus supreme courtwomen
While there is not one single female Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC), the male GOP members on the committee have made it abundantly clear they do not look forward to the optics of their cross-examination of Christine Blasey Ford on Thursday when the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault is scheduled to testify in a public hearing.
According to NBC News, a letter sent to members of the committee on Tuesday by committee staffer Mike Davis said the GOP had hired a woman whom he described as "an experienced sex-crimes prosecutor to serve as an investigative staff counsel for the hearing." Notably, in the wake of Ford coming forward with her credible accusations last week, it was Davis who tweeted that Republicans were "unfazed and determined" to "confirm Judge Kavanaugh."
In response to the development, Sen. Kamala Harris, one of the four Democratic female members of the committee, stated, "Dr. Blasey Ford isn't on trial. This hearing is to determine whether Kavanaugh is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. By hiring a private attorney to cross-examine Dr. Blasey Ford, Republicans are trying to intimidate her and avoid being held accountable by voters."
Republicans have said they will not name the person they have hired.
Later on Tuesday, Sen. Chuck Grassley (D-Iowa), chair of the committee, announced that he had scheduled a vote for Kavanaugh for Friday morning.
As the Huffington Post reports:
There's a simple reason Republicans are doing this: Every GOP senator on the committee is male, and they don't want to be seen as bullying a woman who is speaking out about being sexually assaulted as a teenager.
"There's no particular expertise that a questioner is going to have in this situation," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). "Why are my colleagues hiding from their role as members of the Judiciary Committee?"
The woman they've hired as counsel is a prosecutor with expertise in sex crimes. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of the committee, said he is not releasing the woman's name because he is concerned for her safety. He said the public probably won't know the person's identity prior to the hearing.
"We have done it because we want to depoliticize the whole process like the Democrats politicized the Anita Hill thing," Grassley said.
Following the announcement, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who does not serve on the SJC, told reporters Tuesday afternoon that it would be unwise for male GOP senators to ask Ford questions directly during the hearing. "Somebody will do something that you guys will run 24/7 and inadvertently somebody will do something that's insensitive," Corker said. "I would not be wanting to ask questions about something like this. I'm glad they're going to get outside counsel."
But that doesn't make sense. What could a Republican ever ask a woman, or say about a woman, who says she has survived a sexual assault that would be insensitive?
While there is not one single female Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee (SJC), the male GOP members on the committee have made it abundantly clear they do not look forward to the optics of their cross-examination of Christine Blasey Ford on Thursday when the woman who has accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault is scheduled to testify in a public hearing.
According to NBC News, a letter sent to members of the committee on Tuesday by committee staffer Mike Davis said the GOP had hired a woman whom he described as "an experienced sex-crimes prosecutor to serve as an investigative staff counsel for the hearing." Notably, in the wake of Ford coming forward with her credible accusations last week, it was Davis who tweeted that Republicans were "unfazed and determined" to "confirm Judge Kavanaugh."
In response to the development, Sen. Kamala Harris, one of the four Democratic female members of the committee, stated, "Dr. Blasey Ford isn't on trial. This hearing is to determine whether Kavanaugh is qualified to sit on the Supreme Court. By hiring a private attorney to cross-examine Dr. Blasey Ford, Republicans are trying to intimidate her and avoid being held accountable by voters."
Republicans have said they will not name the person they have hired.
Later on Tuesday, Sen. Chuck Grassley (D-Iowa), chair of the committee, announced that he had scheduled a vote for Kavanaugh for Friday morning.
As the Huffington Post reports:
There's a simple reason Republicans are doing this: Every GOP senator on the committee is male, and they don't want to be seen as bullying a woman who is speaking out about being sexually assaulted as a teenager.
"There's no particular expertise that a questioner is going to have in this situation," said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.). "Why are my colleagues hiding from their role as members of the Judiciary Committee?"
The woman they've hired as counsel is a prosecutor with expertise in sex crimes. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), the chairman of the committee, said he is not releasing the woman's name because he is concerned for her safety. He said the public probably won't know the person's identity prior to the hearing.
"We have done it because we want to depoliticize the whole process like the Democrats politicized the Anita Hill thing," Grassley said.
Following the announcement, Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.), who does not serve on the SJC, told reporters Tuesday afternoon that it would be unwise for male GOP senators to ask Ford questions directly during the hearing. "Somebody will do something that you guys will run 24/7 and inadvertently somebody will do something that's insensitive," Corker said. "I would not be wanting to ask questions about something like this. I'm glad they're going to get outside counsel."
But that doesn't make sense. What could a Republican ever ask a woman, or say about a woman, who says she has survived a sexual assault that would be insensitive?
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.