

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

More than two dozen consumer groups are urging the Senate Commerce Committee to reconsider its witness list--which only includes industry representatives--for an upcoming hearing on data privacy policy. (Photo: Blogtrepreneur/flickr/cc)
While representatives for Apple, AT&T, Amazon, Charter Communications, Google, and Twitter are all slated to testify at a Sept. 26 Senate hearing about safeguarding consumer data privacy, the nation's leading consumer advocacy groups weren't invited--and they're not happy about it.
"The absence of consumer representatives all but ensures a narrow discussion, focused on policy alternatives favored by business groups."
--advocacy groupsIn a letter (pdf) to the leaders of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation on Wednesday, 28 groups expressed their "surprise and concern that not a single consumer representative was invited to testify" and called on committee Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.) and Ranking Member Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) to reconsider the witness list.
"The absence of consumer representatives," the letter warns, "all but ensures a narrow discussion, focused on policy alternatives favored by business groups."
Signatories to the letter include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Common Cause, the Digital Privacy Alliance, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), the Free Press Action Fund, and U.S. PIRG.
The powerful corporations invited to testify, the public interest organizations charge, likely will not "recommend baseline legislation, heightened penalties for data breaches, the end of arbitration clauses, the establishment of a privacy agency in the U.S., techniques for data minimization, or algorithmic transparency to prevent secret profiling of American consumers."
"How can members of the committee develop sensible solutions if they are not even aware of the full range of options?" the letter poses.
"While we have no objection to the participation of business groups in the Senate hearings on consumer privacy, the Senate's first instinct should be to hear from the American public on these important issues," it concludes, reminding the committee leaders that the Senate "is first and foremost a public institution, accountable to the people."
"[Tech firms] know policymakers are considering new privacy protections, and are likely to view this hearing as a chance to encourage Congress to adopt the weakest privacy protections possible--and eviscerate stronger state protections at the same time."
--EFF
Recent polling shows the people want tougher rules for major tech and internet firms. Pew found in June that the majority of Americans "believe these companies should be regulated more than they are now."
Consumer advocates worry that industry representatives will not only leave out key proposals to protect privacy, but also actively discourage lawmakers from adopting stricter policies to serve the public interest.
"Some of these companies have spent heavily to oppose consumer privacy legislation and have never supported consumer privacy laws," the Electronic Frontier Foundation--one of the letter's signees--notes in blog post. "They know policymakers are considering new privacy protections, and are likely to view this hearing as a chance to encourage Congress to adopt the weakest privacy protections possible--and eviscerate stronger state protections at the same time."
EFF also emphasizes that "when this Congress has taken action on privacy hazards, whether from the government or from corporations, it has pro-actively stripped us of our privacy protections," suggesting that "internet users should wonder whether the upcoming Senate Commerce hearing is just a prelude to yet another rollback of privacy protections."
Thune claimed in a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to "provide leading technology companies and internet service providers an opportunity to explain their approaches to privacy, how they plan to address new requirements from the European Union and California, and what Congress can do to promote clear privacy expectations without hurting innovation."
"Beyond that, it's not clear exactly what the point of the hearing is," TechCrunch reported when it was announced last week. This will be the second committee hearing this year to focus on consumer data privacy, following Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg's April testimony. Facebook, as TechCrunch points out, is "noticeably absent" from the tentative witness list for Sept. 26.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
While representatives for Apple, AT&T, Amazon, Charter Communications, Google, and Twitter are all slated to testify at a Sept. 26 Senate hearing about safeguarding consumer data privacy, the nation's leading consumer advocacy groups weren't invited--and they're not happy about it.
"The absence of consumer representatives all but ensures a narrow discussion, focused on policy alternatives favored by business groups."
--advocacy groupsIn a letter (pdf) to the leaders of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation on Wednesday, 28 groups expressed their "surprise and concern that not a single consumer representative was invited to testify" and called on committee Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.) and Ranking Member Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) to reconsider the witness list.
"The absence of consumer representatives," the letter warns, "all but ensures a narrow discussion, focused on policy alternatives favored by business groups."
Signatories to the letter include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Common Cause, the Digital Privacy Alliance, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), the Free Press Action Fund, and U.S. PIRG.
The powerful corporations invited to testify, the public interest organizations charge, likely will not "recommend baseline legislation, heightened penalties for data breaches, the end of arbitration clauses, the establishment of a privacy agency in the U.S., techniques for data minimization, or algorithmic transparency to prevent secret profiling of American consumers."
"How can members of the committee develop sensible solutions if they are not even aware of the full range of options?" the letter poses.
"While we have no objection to the participation of business groups in the Senate hearings on consumer privacy, the Senate's first instinct should be to hear from the American public on these important issues," it concludes, reminding the committee leaders that the Senate "is first and foremost a public institution, accountable to the people."
"[Tech firms] know policymakers are considering new privacy protections, and are likely to view this hearing as a chance to encourage Congress to adopt the weakest privacy protections possible--and eviscerate stronger state protections at the same time."
--EFF
Recent polling shows the people want tougher rules for major tech and internet firms. Pew found in June that the majority of Americans "believe these companies should be regulated more than they are now."
Consumer advocates worry that industry representatives will not only leave out key proposals to protect privacy, but also actively discourage lawmakers from adopting stricter policies to serve the public interest.
"Some of these companies have spent heavily to oppose consumer privacy legislation and have never supported consumer privacy laws," the Electronic Frontier Foundation--one of the letter's signees--notes in blog post. "They know policymakers are considering new privacy protections, and are likely to view this hearing as a chance to encourage Congress to adopt the weakest privacy protections possible--and eviscerate stronger state protections at the same time."
EFF also emphasizes that "when this Congress has taken action on privacy hazards, whether from the government or from corporations, it has pro-actively stripped us of our privacy protections," suggesting that "internet users should wonder whether the upcoming Senate Commerce hearing is just a prelude to yet another rollback of privacy protections."
Thune claimed in a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to "provide leading technology companies and internet service providers an opportunity to explain their approaches to privacy, how they plan to address new requirements from the European Union and California, and what Congress can do to promote clear privacy expectations without hurting innovation."
"Beyond that, it's not clear exactly what the point of the hearing is," TechCrunch reported when it was announced last week. This will be the second committee hearing this year to focus on consumer data privacy, following Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg's April testimony. Facebook, as TechCrunch points out, is "noticeably absent" from the tentative witness list for Sept. 26.
While representatives for Apple, AT&T, Amazon, Charter Communications, Google, and Twitter are all slated to testify at a Sept. 26 Senate hearing about safeguarding consumer data privacy, the nation's leading consumer advocacy groups weren't invited--and they're not happy about it.
"The absence of consumer representatives all but ensures a narrow discussion, focused on policy alternatives favored by business groups."
--advocacy groupsIn a letter (pdf) to the leaders of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science & Transportation on Wednesday, 28 groups expressed their "surprise and concern that not a single consumer representative was invited to testify" and called on committee Chairman John Thune (R-S.D.) and Ranking Member Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) to reconsider the witness list.
"The absence of consumer representatives," the letter warns, "all but ensures a narrow discussion, focused on policy alternatives favored by business groups."
Signatories to the letter include the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Common Cause, the Digital Privacy Alliance, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), the Free Press Action Fund, and U.S. PIRG.
The powerful corporations invited to testify, the public interest organizations charge, likely will not "recommend baseline legislation, heightened penalties for data breaches, the end of arbitration clauses, the establishment of a privacy agency in the U.S., techniques for data minimization, or algorithmic transparency to prevent secret profiling of American consumers."
"How can members of the committee develop sensible solutions if they are not even aware of the full range of options?" the letter poses.
"While we have no objection to the participation of business groups in the Senate hearings on consumer privacy, the Senate's first instinct should be to hear from the American public on these important issues," it concludes, reminding the committee leaders that the Senate "is first and foremost a public institution, accountable to the people."
"[Tech firms] know policymakers are considering new privacy protections, and are likely to view this hearing as a chance to encourage Congress to adopt the weakest privacy protections possible--and eviscerate stronger state protections at the same time."
--EFF
Recent polling shows the people want tougher rules for major tech and internet firms. Pew found in June that the majority of Americans "believe these companies should be regulated more than they are now."
Consumer advocates worry that industry representatives will not only leave out key proposals to protect privacy, but also actively discourage lawmakers from adopting stricter policies to serve the public interest.
"Some of these companies have spent heavily to oppose consumer privacy legislation and have never supported consumer privacy laws," the Electronic Frontier Foundation--one of the letter's signees--notes in blog post. "They know policymakers are considering new privacy protections, and are likely to view this hearing as a chance to encourage Congress to adopt the weakest privacy protections possible--and eviscerate stronger state protections at the same time."
EFF also emphasizes that "when this Congress has taken action on privacy hazards, whether from the government or from corporations, it has pro-actively stripped us of our privacy protections," suggesting that "internet users should wonder whether the upcoming Senate Commerce hearing is just a prelude to yet another rollback of privacy protections."
Thune claimed in a statement that the purpose of the hearing is to "provide leading technology companies and internet service providers an opportunity to explain their approaches to privacy, how they plan to address new requirements from the European Union and California, and what Congress can do to promote clear privacy expectations without hurting innovation."
"Beyond that, it's not clear exactly what the point of the hearing is," TechCrunch reported when it was announced last week. This will be the second committee hearing this year to focus on consumer data privacy, following Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg's April testimony. Facebook, as TechCrunch points out, is "noticeably absent" from the tentative witness list for Sept. 26.