SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Three hundred and twelve operational squadrons is not enough," said the Secretary of the Air Force Heather Wilson on Monday, saying she wants 70 additional squadrons. "It takes all of us to get that combat power ready and able to fight. A fist is nothing without the weight of the body behind it." (Photo: US Air Force/Twitter)
When it comes to progressive proposals aimed at social well-being, the associated costs are always the first explanation for why such efforts are either unrealistic "pie in the sky".
Medicare for All. But how you gonna pay for it?
Tuition-free public college. But how you gonna pay for it?
Paid family leave and sick leave. But how you gonna pay for it?
The urgently-needed rapid and just transition to 100 percent renewable energy? But how you gonna pay for it?
Meanwhile, news outlets reported Tuesday that President Donald Trump's so-called "Space Force"--if approved--would require $13 billion in funding over its first five years alone and word from the U.S. Air Force on Monday was that it wants to acquire an additional 70 squadrons--which would include scores of new aircraft--in the coming years.
According to Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, her branch of the military intends to grow its fighting force by nearly 25 percent in the coming years. That would include:
5 additional bomber squadrons
7 more fighter squadrons
7 additional space squadrons
14 more tanker squadrons
7 special operations squadrons
9 nine combat search-and-rescue squadrons
22 squadrons that conduct command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
2 remotely piloted aircraft squadrons
1 more airlift squadron
In her comments to attendees at the annual Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference outside Washington, D.C. on Monday, Wilson said that while the Air Force already has 312 active squadrons operating around the globe, the U.S. empire would be more powerful and effective if they havd more. "Three hundred and twelve operational squadrons is not enough," she said. "It takes all of us to get that combat power ready and able to fight. A fist is nothing without the weight of the body behind it."
\u201c.@SecAFOfficial recently rolled out the @USAirForce we need. Today, I\u2019ll lay out how we need to prepare & present this force to the combatant commanders to be able to compete & deter, fight & win -- the #AirForce we need for #multidomain operations. #ASC18\u201d— (Archive) Gen. Dave Goldfein (@(Archive) Gen. Dave Goldfein) 1537278660
Wilson added that the Air Force was not "naive" about the scale of their ambition and characterized the decision to expand as "a choice" they were making.
"Right now the Air Force spends about $53 [billion] per year on aircraft operations, training, and recruiting," tweeted Todd Harrison, director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, during Wilson's speech. "Increasing the number of squadrons by [roughly] 24 [percent] would probably add another $13 [billion] per year in these operating costs."
Strikingly, $13 billion was the same name figure, according to the Associated Press, that the Pentagon believes the Space Force program will need to get off the ground.
"The memo says the first-year cost of a Space Force would be $3.3 billion," AP reports, "and the cost over five years would be an estimated $12.9 billion."
As Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Democratic congressional candidate from New York, tweeted last month:
\u201cJust so we\u2019re clear. \n\nThings we FIND money to pay for:\n\u2705 $2T in tax cuts for billionaires\n\u2705 $210 Billion Trade War\n\u2705 $XX? Space Force (who cares how much, right?)\n\nThings We Refuse to Pay for:\n\u274c Just Recovery for Puerto Rico\ud83c\uddf5\ud83c\uddf7\n\u274c Medicare for All\n\u274c Tuition-Free College\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1533866987
That this remains the pattern is not news. And yet, it's worth repeating.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When it comes to progressive proposals aimed at social well-being, the associated costs are always the first explanation for why such efforts are either unrealistic "pie in the sky".
Medicare for All. But how you gonna pay for it?
Tuition-free public college. But how you gonna pay for it?
Paid family leave and sick leave. But how you gonna pay for it?
The urgently-needed rapid and just transition to 100 percent renewable energy? But how you gonna pay for it?
Meanwhile, news outlets reported Tuesday that President Donald Trump's so-called "Space Force"--if approved--would require $13 billion in funding over its first five years alone and word from the U.S. Air Force on Monday was that it wants to acquire an additional 70 squadrons--which would include scores of new aircraft--in the coming years.
According to Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, her branch of the military intends to grow its fighting force by nearly 25 percent in the coming years. That would include:
5 additional bomber squadrons
7 more fighter squadrons
7 additional space squadrons
14 more tanker squadrons
7 special operations squadrons
9 nine combat search-and-rescue squadrons
22 squadrons that conduct command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
2 remotely piloted aircraft squadrons
1 more airlift squadron
In her comments to attendees at the annual Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference outside Washington, D.C. on Monday, Wilson said that while the Air Force already has 312 active squadrons operating around the globe, the U.S. empire would be more powerful and effective if they havd more. "Three hundred and twelve operational squadrons is not enough," she said. "It takes all of us to get that combat power ready and able to fight. A fist is nothing without the weight of the body behind it."
\u201c.@SecAFOfficial recently rolled out the @USAirForce we need. Today, I\u2019ll lay out how we need to prepare & present this force to the combatant commanders to be able to compete & deter, fight & win -- the #AirForce we need for #multidomain operations. #ASC18\u201d— (Archive) Gen. Dave Goldfein (@(Archive) Gen. Dave Goldfein) 1537278660
Wilson added that the Air Force was not "naive" about the scale of their ambition and characterized the decision to expand as "a choice" they were making.
"Right now the Air Force spends about $53 [billion] per year on aircraft operations, training, and recruiting," tweeted Todd Harrison, director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, during Wilson's speech. "Increasing the number of squadrons by [roughly] 24 [percent] would probably add another $13 [billion] per year in these operating costs."
Strikingly, $13 billion was the same name figure, according to the Associated Press, that the Pentagon believes the Space Force program will need to get off the ground.
"The memo says the first-year cost of a Space Force would be $3.3 billion," AP reports, "and the cost over five years would be an estimated $12.9 billion."
As Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Democratic congressional candidate from New York, tweeted last month:
\u201cJust so we\u2019re clear. \n\nThings we FIND money to pay for:\n\u2705 $2T in tax cuts for billionaires\n\u2705 $210 Billion Trade War\n\u2705 $XX? Space Force (who cares how much, right?)\n\nThings We Refuse to Pay for:\n\u274c Just Recovery for Puerto Rico\ud83c\uddf5\ud83c\uddf7\n\u274c Medicare for All\n\u274c Tuition-Free College\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1533866987
That this remains the pattern is not news. And yet, it's worth repeating.
When it comes to progressive proposals aimed at social well-being, the associated costs are always the first explanation for why such efforts are either unrealistic "pie in the sky".
Medicare for All. But how you gonna pay for it?
Tuition-free public college. But how you gonna pay for it?
Paid family leave and sick leave. But how you gonna pay for it?
The urgently-needed rapid and just transition to 100 percent renewable energy? But how you gonna pay for it?
Meanwhile, news outlets reported Tuesday that President Donald Trump's so-called "Space Force"--if approved--would require $13 billion in funding over its first five years alone and word from the U.S. Air Force on Monday was that it wants to acquire an additional 70 squadrons--which would include scores of new aircraft--in the coming years.
According to Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson, her branch of the military intends to grow its fighting force by nearly 25 percent in the coming years. That would include:
5 additional bomber squadrons
7 more fighter squadrons
7 additional space squadrons
14 more tanker squadrons
7 special operations squadrons
9 nine combat search-and-rescue squadrons
22 squadrons that conduct command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance
2 remotely piloted aircraft squadrons
1 more airlift squadron
In her comments to attendees at the annual Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference outside Washington, D.C. on Monday, Wilson said that while the Air Force already has 312 active squadrons operating around the globe, the U.S. empire would be more powerful and effective if they havd more. "Three hundred and twelve operational squadrons is not enough," she said. "It takes all of us to get that combat power ready and able to fight. A fist is nothing without the weight of the body behind it."
\u201c.@SecAFOfficial recently rolled out the @USAirForce we need. Today, I\u2019ll lay out how we need to prepare & present this force to the combatant commanders to be able to compete & deter, fight & win -- the #AirForce we need for #multidomain operations. #ASC18\u201d— (Archive) Gen. Dave Goldfein (@(Archive) Gen. Dave Goldfein) 1537278660
Wilson added that the Air Force was not "naive" about the scale of their ambition and characterized the decision to expand as "a choice" they were making.
"Right now the Air Force spends about $53 [billion] per year on aircraft operations, training, and recruiting," tweeted Todd Harrison, director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, during Wilson's speech. "Increasing the number of squadrons by [roughly] 24 [percent] would probably add another $13 [billion] per year in these operating costs."
Strikingly, $13 billion was the same name figure, according to the Associated Press, that the Pentagon believes the Space Force program will need to get off the ground.
"The memo says the first-year cost of a Space Force would be $3.3 billion," AP reports, "and the cost over five years would be an estimated $12.9 billion."
As Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Democratic congressional candidate from New York, tweeted last month:
\u201cJust so we\u2019re clear. \n\nThings we FIND money to pay for:\n\u2705 $2T in tax cuts for billionaires\n\u2705 $210 Billion Trade War\n\u2705 $XX? Space Force (who cares how much, right?)\n\nThings We Refuse to Pay for:\n\u274c Just Recovery for Puerto Rico\ud83c\uddf5\ud83c\uddf7\n\u274c Medicare for All\n\u274c Tuition-Free College\u201d— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) 1533866987
That this remains the pattern is not news. And yet, it's worth repeating.