SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A protester at a pro-net neutrality demonstration in Boston. Twenty-two state attorneys general and the District of Columbia have asked a court to reinstate net neutrality regulations that were repealed by the Federal Communications Commission last year. (Photo: Tim Carter/Flickr/cc)
Declaring Free and Open Internet 'Critical' for Democracy, 23 State AGs Call on Court to Reinstate Net Neutrality
The FCC's unpopular repeal of net neutrality protections leaves Americans exposed not only to abusive practices by ISPs but also potential safety hazards, argue states
Aug 21, 2018
Arguing that the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) deeply unpopular repeal of net neutrality rules is both unlawful and poses real safety hazards for Americans, 23 state attorneys general asked a federal appeals court to reinstate the regulations.
"A free and open internet is critical to New York--and to our democracy," said New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, who led the filing of Monday's brief. "By repealing net neutrality, the FCC is allowing internet service providers to put their profits before consumers while controlling what we see, do, and say online."
The brief was submitted as part of the lawsuit Underwood--along with her counterparts from states including California, Pennsylvania, and Mississippi, as well as the District of Columbia--filed weeks after the FCC repealed the rules last December.
In addition to putting Americans at risk for abusive practices by internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon and Comcast who are now able to block and throttle traffic to certain websites while offering paid "fast lanes" to internet companies that can afford them, the net neutrality repeal could potentially endanger people's safety, the attorneys general argued.
"The absence of open internet rules jeopardizes the ability to reduce load in times of extreme energy grid stress," said the attorneys general. "Consequently, the order threatens the reliability of the electric grid."
The FCC's decision--made along party lines with chairman and former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai leading the attack on net neutrality--went against the wishes of 83 percent of Americans, according to polls taken at the time. Since the decision, six state governors have filed executive orders while three states have passed legislation to protect net neutrality at the state level.
In their brief, the states also argued that the FCC's order "unlawfully purports to preempt state and local regulation of broadband service."
"The rollback of net neutrality will have a devastating impact on millions of New Yorkers and Americans across the country, putting them at risk of abusive practices while undermining state and local regulation of the broadband industry," said Underwood. "We'll continue to fight to protect consumers' right to a free and open internet."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Arguing that the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) deeply unpopular repeal of net neutrality rules is both unlawful and poses real safety hazards for Americans, 23 state attorneys general asked a federal appeals court to reinstate the regulations.
"A free and open internet is critical to New York--and to our democracy," said New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, who led the filing of Monday's brief. "By repealing net neutrality, the FCC is allowing internet service providers to put their profits before consumers while controlling what we see, do, and say online."
The brief was submitted as part of the lawsuit Underwood--along with her counterparts from states including California, Pennsylvania, and Mississippi, as well as the District of Columbia--filed weeks after the FCC repealed the rules last December.
In addition to putting Americans at risk for abusive practices by internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon and Comcast who are now able to block and throttle traffic to certain websites while offering paid "fast lanes" to internet companies that can afford them, the net neutrality repeal could potentially endanger people's safety, the attorneys general argued.
"The absence of open internet rules jeopardizes the ability to reduce load in times of extreme energy grid stress," said the attorneys general. "Consequently, the order threatens the reliability of the electric grid."
The FCC's decision--made along party lines with chairman and former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai leading the attack on net neutrality--went against the wishes of 83 percent of Americans, according to polls taken at the time. Since the decision, six state governors have filed executive orders while three states have passed legislation to protect net neutrality at the state level.
In their brief, the states also argued that the FCC's order "unlawfully purports to preempt state and local regulation of broadband service."
"The rollback of net neutrality will have a devastating impact on millions of New Yorkers and Americans across the country, putting them at risk of abusive practices while undermining state and local regulation of the broadband industry," said Underwood. "We'll continue to fight to protect consumers' right to a free and open internet."
Arguing that the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) deeply unpopular repeal of net neutrality rules is both unlawful and poses real safety hazards for Americans, 23 state attorneys general asked a federal appeals court to reinstate the regulations.
"A free and open internet is critical to New York--and to our democracy," said New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood, who led the filing of Monday's brief. "By repealing net neutrality, the FCC is allowing internet service providers to put their profits before consumers while controlling what we see, do, and say online."
The brief was submitted as part of the lawsuit Underwood--along with her counterparts from states including California, Pennsylvania, and Mississippi, as well as the District of Columbia--filed weeks after the FCC repealed the rules last December.
In addition to putting Americans at risk for abusive practices by internet service providers (ISPs) like Verizon and Comcast who are now able to block and throttle traffic to certain websites while offering paid "fast lanes" to internet companies that can afford them, the net neutrality repeal could potentially endanger people's safety, the attorneys general argued.
"The absence of open internet rules jeopardizes the ability to reduce load in times of extreme energy grid stress," said the attorneys general. "Consequently, the order threatens the reliability of the electric grid."
The FCC's decision--made along party lines with chairman and former Verizon lawyer Ajit Pai leading the attack on net neutrality--went against the wishes of 83 percent of Americans, according to polls taken at the time. Since the decision, six state governors have filed executive orders while three states have passed legislation to protect net neutrality at the state level.
In their brief, the states also argued that the FCC's order "unlawfully purports to preempt state and local regulation of broadband service."
"The rollback of net neutrality will have a devastating impact on millions of New Yorkers and Americans across the country, putting them at risk of abusive practices while undermining state and local regulation of the broadband industry," said Underwood. "We'll continue to fight to protect consumers' right to a free and open internet."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.