New York U.S. House candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speaks at a progressive fundraiser on August 2, 2018 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images)
Dismissing Ben Shapiro's Debate Offer as 'Just Like Catcalling,' Ocasio-Cortez Says 'Men With Bad Intentions' Don't Deserve a Response
"I don't owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions. And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one."
After right-wing provocateur and pseudo-intellectual Ben Shapiro made an almost certainly illegal offer earlier this week to donate $10,000 to New York congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's campaign if she agreed to a public debate on the merits of socialism, Ocasio-Cortez compared Shapiro's "unsolicited" offer to "catcalling" and argued bad-faith actors like Shapiro don't deserve a response.
"Just like catcalling, I don't owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions," Ocasio-Cortez wrote after a right-wing reporter accused her of refusing to reply to Shapiro's request. "And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one."
Here is Shapiro's request, which prompted widespread ridicule:
While Shapiro has repeatedly demonstrated complete disdain for facts and basic standards of human decency--in one particularly racist moment, the 34-year-old lawyer declared on Twitter that "Arabs like to bomb crap and live in open sewage"--he has nonetheless been touted by such outlets as the New York Times as a master debater and "destroyer of weak arguments."
"Young people are identifying as socialists, the right has nothing to offer beyond grievance and hate, and the left is actually putting forward serious ideas."
--Nathan Robinson, Current Affairs
Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan Robinson--who penned a thorough, measured, and must-read takedown of Shapiro late last year--begs to differ with this characterization, and has repeatedly offered to debate Shapiro in a public forum.
Shapiro--despite his repeated insistence that leftists are afraid to debate and that they are dodging him--has never responded to these requests or to Robinson's piece, but late Thursday Current Affairs seized upon Shapiro's expressed desire to debate socialism to renew Robinson's offer.
"Let's talk about socialism," reads a graphic Current Affairs posted to its Twitter account, calling on Shapiro and two other prominent conservatives to agree to a panel debate with Robinson; Briahna Joy Gray, senior politics editor at The Intercept; and Maximillian Alvarez, a writer at The Baffler.
"We'll even let Ben keep his $10k," Current Affairs tweeted. "Surely they'd love this!"
With the help of fawning profiles in the Times and other major American outlets, Shapiro has fashioned himself as a ruthlessly logical foil of the left, but Current Affairs concluded on Thursday that Shapiro's unwillingness to actually engage with leftists like Robinson and Gray put the lie to the notion that Shapiro is interested in a serious discussion of ideas.
Responding to one Twitter user who offered to reserve a 600-seat University of Michigan auditorium for the proposed panel debate, Current Affairs wrote, "How can they say no? Unless, of course, it turns out that the right actually don't want to debate 'ideas.'"
"Young people are identifying as socialists, the right has nothing to offer beyond grievance and hate, and the left is actually putting forward serious ideas," Robinson concluded in a recent piece. "One of the most peculiar features of contemporary politics is how unwilling conservatives are to actually defend many of their core ideas and policies (to the extent that they actually have them)."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
After right-wing provocateur and pseudo-intellectual Ben Shapiro made an almost certainly illegal offer earlier this week to donate $10,000 to New York congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's campaign if she agreed to a public debate on the merits of socialism, Ocasio-Cortez compared Shapiro's "unsolicited" offer to "catcalling" and argued bad-faith actors like Shapiro don't deserve a response.
"Just like catcalling, I don't owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions," Ocasio-Cortez wrote after a right-wing reporter accused her of refusing to reply to Shapiro's request. "And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one."
Here is Shapiro's request, which prompted widespread ridicule:
While Shapiro has repeatedly demonstrated complete disdain for facts and basic standards of human decency--in one particularly racist moment, the 34-year-old lawyer declared on Twitter that "Arabs like to bomb crap and live in open sewage"--he has nonetheless been touted by such outlets as the New York Times as a master debater and "destroyer of weak arguments."
"Young people are identifying as socialists, the right has nothing to offer beyond grievance and hate, and the left is actually putting forward serious ideas."
--Nathan Robinson, Current Affairs
Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan Robinson--who penned a thorough, measured, and must-read takedown of Shapiro late last year--begs to differ with this characterization, and has repeatedly offered to debate Shapiro in a public forum.
Shapiro--despite his repeated insistence that leftists are afraid to debate and that they are dodging him--has never responded to these requests or to Robinson's piece, but late Thursday Current Affairs seized upon Shapiro's expressed desire to debate socialism to renew Robinson's offer.
"Let's talk about socialism," reads a graphic Current Affairs posted to its Twitter account, calling on Shapiro and two other prominent conservatives to agree to a panel debate with Robinson; Briahna Joy Gray, senior politics editor at The Intercept; and Maximillian Alvarez, a writer at The Baffler.
"We'll even let Ben keep his $10k," Current Affairs tweeted. "Surely they'd love this!"
With the help of fawning profiles in the Times and other major American outlets, Shapiro has fashioned himself as a ruthlessly logical foil of the left, but Current Affairs concluded on Thursday that Shapiro's unwillingness to actually engage with leftists like Robinson and Gray put the lie to the notion that Shapiro is interested in a serious discussion of ideas.
Responding to one Twitter user who offered to reserve a 600-seat University of Michigan auditorium for the proposed panel debate, Current Affairs wrote, "How can they say no? Unless, of course, it turns out that the right actually don't want to debate 'ideas.'"
"Young people are identifying as socialists, the right has nothing to offer beyond grievance and hate, and the left is actually putting forward serious ideas," Robinson concluded in a recent piece. "One of the most peculiar features of contemporary politics is how unwilling conservatives are to actually defend many of their core ideas and policies (to the extent that they actually have them)."
After right-wing provocateur and pseudo-intellectual Ben Shapiro made an almost certainly illegal offer earlier this week to donate $10,000 to New York congressional candidate Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's campaign if she agreed to a public debate on the merits of socialism, Ocasio-Cortez compared Shapiro's "unsolicited" offer to "catcalling" and argued bad-faith actors like Shapiro don't deserve a response.
"Just like catcalling, I don't owe a response to unsolicited requests from men with bad intentions," Ocasio-Cortez wrote after a right-wing reporter accused her of refusing to reply to Shapiro's request. "And also like catcalling, for some reason they feel entitled to one."
Here is Shapiro's request, which prompted widespread ridicule:
While Shapiro has repeatedly demonstrated complete disdain for facts and basic standards of human decency--in one particularly racist moment, the 34-year-old lawyer declared on Twitter that "Arabs like to bomb crap and live in open sewage"--he has nonetheless been touted by such outlets as the New York Times as a master debater and "destroyer of weak arguments."
"Young people are identifying as socialists, the right has nothing to offer beyond grievance and hate, and the left is actually putting forward serious ideas."
--Nathan Robinson, Current Affairs
Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan Robinson--who penned a thorough, measured, and must-read takedown of Shapiro late last year--begs to differ with this characterization, and has repeatedly offered to debate Shapiro in a public forum.
Shapiro--despite his repeated insistence that leftists are afraid to debate and that they are dodging him--has never responded to these requests or to Robinson's piece, but late Thursday Current Affairs seized upon Shapiro's expressed desire to debate socialism to renew Robinson's offer.
"Let's talk about socialism," reads a graphic Current Affairs posted to its Twitter account, calling on Shapiro and two other prominent conservatives to agree to a panel debate with Robinson; Briahna Joy Gray, senior politics editor at The Intercept; and Maximillian Alvarez, a writer at The Baffler.
"We'll even let Ben keep his $10k," Current Affairs tweeted. "Surely they'd love this!"
With the help of fawning profiles in the Times and other major American outlets, Shapiro has fashioned himself as a ruthlessly logical foil of the left, but Current Affairs concluded on Thursday that Shapiro's unwillingness to actually engage with leftists like Robinson and Gray put the lie to the notion that Shapiro is interested in a serious discussion of ideas.
Responding to one Twitter user who offered to reserve a 600-seat University of Michigan auditorium for the proposed panel debate, Current Affairs wrote, "How can they say no? Unless, of course, it turns out that the right actually don't want to debate 'ideas.'"
"Young people are identifying as socialists, the right has nothing to offer beyond grievance and hate, and the left is actually putting forward serious ideas," Robinson concluded in a recent piece. "One of the most peculiar features of contemporary politics is how unwilling conservatives are to actually defend many of their core ideas and policies (to the extent that they actually have them)."