

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

U.S. Vice President Mike Pence announces the Trump Administration's plan to create the U.S. Space Force by 2020 during a speech at the Pentagon August 9, 2018 in Arlington, Virginia. Describing space as "crowded and adversarial," Pence said the new Space Force would be a separate, sixth branch of the military. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
U.S. Vice President Mike Pence strapped on his most earnest "serious face" on Thursday as he made the argument about why the U.S. military must come to dominate outer space with its military - an idea that has been panned with a stream of derisive adjectives that could quite possibly stretch to Mars and back.
"What was once peaceful and uncontested is now crowded and adversarial," said Pence of space during his speech at the Pentagon.
"And as President Trump has said, in his words," he continued, "it is not enough to merely have an American presence in space, we must have American dominance in space. And so we will."
Watch:
But was Pence's a convincing case? Not really.
As Common Dreams has previously reported--in a piece overtly titled Poverty Rampant, Puerto Rico Destroyed, Single Payer "Too Expensive," and Flint Still Doesn't Have Clean Water. But You Can Have Space Force!--the idea that more Pentagon spending should be devoted to further militarizing and dominating outer space--when so many pressing problems remain under-funded and unsolved--is laughable on its face.
And as columnist Belen Fernandez articulated in June of this year, the idea of increasing military infrastructure in space, let alone creating a so-called Space Force, is "astronomically misguided."
Meanwhile, the ridicule and ire directed at Pence's speech on Thursday mounted quickly online.
What follows is a (small) sample.
"Idiotic":
"Wasteful":
On the one hand, Space Force is a foolish idea that solves no actual problems, but on the other hand, it's a great way to transfer taxpayer money to defense contractors
-- Spencer Ackerman (@attackerman) August 9, 2018
"Ridiculous":
Though as some noted, Space Force might create jobs. And that's important:
In the end, however, President Trump was not going to let Pence get all the credit for Space Force:
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
U.S. Vice President Mike Pence strapped on his most earnest "serious face" on Thursday as he made the argument about why the U.S. military must come to dominate outer space with its military - an idea that has been panned with a stream of derisive adjectives that could quite possibly stretch to Mars and back.
"What was once peaceful and uncontested is now crowded and adversarial," said Pence of space during his speech at the Pentagon.
"And as President Trump has said, in his words," he continued, "it is not enough to merely have an American presence in space, we must have American dominance in space. And so we will."
Watch:
But was Pence's a convincing case? Not really.
As Common Dreams has previously reported--in a piece overtly titled Poverty Rampant, Puerto Rico Destroyed, Single Payer "Too Expensive," and Flint Still Doesn't Have Clean Water. But You Can Have Space Force!--the idea that more Pentagon spending should be devoted to further militarizing and dominating outer space--when so many pressing problems remain under-funded and unsolved--is laughable on its face.
And as columnist Belen Fernandez articulated in June of this year, the idea of increasing military infrastructure in space, let alone creating a so-called Space Force, is "astronomically misguided."
Meanwhile, the ridicule and ire directed at Pence's speech on Thursday mounted quickly online.
What follows is a (small) sample.
"Idiotic":
"Wasteful":
On the one hand, Space Force is a foolish idea that solves no actual problems, but on the other hand, it's a great way to transfer taxpayer money to defense contractors
-- Spencer Ackerman (@attackerman) August 9, 2018
"Ridiculous":
Though as some noted, Space Force might create jobs. And that's important:
In the end, however, President Trump was not going to let Pence get all the credit for Space Force:
U.S. Vice President Mike Pence strapped on his most earnest "serious face" on Thursday as he made the argument about why the U.S. military must come to dominate outer space with its military - an idea that has been panned with a stream of derisive adjectives that could quite possibly stretch to Mars and back.
"What was once peaceful and uncontested is now crowded and adversarial," said Pence of space during his speech at the Pentagon.
"And as President Trump has said, in his words," he continued, "it is not enough to merely have an American presence in space, we must have American dominance in space. And so we will."
Watch:
But was Pence's a convincing case? Not really.
As Common Dreams has previously reported--in a piece overtly titled Poverty Rampant, Puerto Rico Destroyed, Single Payer "Too Expensive," and Flint Still Doesn't Have Clean Water. But You Can Have Space Force!--the idea that more Pentagon spending should be devoted to further militarizing and dominating outer space--when so many pressing problems remain under-funded and unsolved--is laughable on its face.
And as columnist Belen Fernandez articulated in June of this year, the idea of increasing military infrastructure in space, let alone creating a so-called Space Force, is "astronomically misguided."
Meanwhile, the ridicule and ire directed at Pence's speech on Thursday mounted quickly online.
What follows is a (small) sample.
"Idiotic":
"Wasteful":
On the one hand, Space Force is a foolish idea that solves no actual problems, but on the other hand, it's a great way to transfer taxpayer money to defense contractors
-- Spencer Ackerman (@attackerman) August 9, 2018
"Ridiculous":
Though as some noted, Space Force might create jobs. And that's important:
In the end, however, President Trump was not going to let Pence get all the credit for Space Force: