A woman sits with her son at the Catholic Charities Humanitarian Respite Center in McAllen, Texas, shortly after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Jul 10, 2018
In the latest ruling against the president's cruel and inhumane border policy, a federal judge slammed the Trump administration's argument for changing a decades-old agreement limiting the amount of time a child can legally be detained by the government, calling the Justice Department's attempt to gain approval for its plan to detain families indefinitely "tortured" and "wholly without merit."
"Defendants seek to light a match to the Flores agreement and ask this court to upend the parties' agreement by judicial fiat," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee. "It is apparent that defendants' application is a cynical attempt...to shift responsibility to the judiciary for over 20 years of Congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate."
The Flores settlement agreement was decided in 1997, stipulating that children in immigrant detention centers can be held for no longer than 20 days.
The Trump administration moved to change the rule just after President Donald Trump reluctantly signed an executive order on June 20 to end forcible family separation, after the practice provoked international outcry.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end." --Efren C. Olivares, Texas Civil Rights Project
The government argued that the Flores agreement cannot be followed as it stands because it requires the separation of families, and that families must be held until their immigration hearings take place to ensure that they show up in court.
"The evidentiary record is unclear as to the accuracy of defendants' assertion," wrote Gee. "Even assuming defendants are correct, however, this risk was plainly contemplated by the parties when they executed the Flores agreement in 1997...It does not support a blanket non-release policy or warrant the agreement's modification."
"Sifting through the government's false narrative, the court clearly found that the Flores settlement has never resulted in the separation of families," Peter Schey, an attorney representing detained children, told CBS News. "President Trump needs to take responsibility for his own misguided policies."
"Today's decision reiterates that family detention has never been acceptable," said Efren C. Olivares, racial and economic justice director for the Texas Civil Rights Project, in a statement. "For weeks, we watched in horror as children have been ripped from their parents, but the remedy for family separation is not, and never will be, holding them indefinitely in detention facilities that are functionally prisons. We've seen today that the courts will not allow indefinite family detention to serve as the solution to this crisis manufactured by the Trump administration."
The decision represents the latest recent victory for immigrant rights advocates who have been fighting Trump's "zero tolerance" immigration policy and the separation of families. Over the weekend, a federal court denied Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar's request for an extension on the deadline to reunite families.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end," said Olivares.
The Families Belong Together coalition celebrated Gee's decision and reminded supporters to continue fighting Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
\u201cYES!!!! Flores upheld. This is a tiny, tiny bit of good news. #FamiliesBelongTogether #EndFamilyDetention https://t.co/xJ49ar9jL2\u201d— Immigrant Justice NOW (@Immigrant Justice NOW) 1531227097
\u201cIMPORTANT: This is a temporary victory. \n\nThis court decision is a positive step, but the administration will likely appeal it. \n\nAnd if it goes to the SCOTUS? We saw what happened with the #MuslimBan. \n\nhttps://t.co/xJ49ar9jL2\n\n#FamiliesBelongTogether\n#EndFamiliyDetention\u201d— Immigrant Justice NOW (@Immigrant Justice NOW) 1531227097
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the latest ruling against the president's cruel and inhumane border policy, a federal judge slammed the Trump administration's argument for changing a decades-old agreement limiting the amount of time a child can legally be detained by the government, calling the Justice Department's attempt to gain approval for its plan to detain families indefinitely "tortured" and "wholly without merit."
"Defendants seek to light a match to the Flores agreement and ask this court to upend the parties' agreement by judicial fiat," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee. "It is apparent that defendants' application is a cynical attempt...to shift responsibility to the judiciary for over 20 years of Congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate."
The Flores settlement agreement was decided in 1997, stipulating that children in immigrant detention centers can be held for no longer than 20 days.
The Trump administration moved to change the rule just after President Donald Trump reluctantly signed an executive order on June 20 to end forcible family separation, after the practice provoked international outcry.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end." --Efren C. Olivares, Texas Civil Rights Project
The government argued that the Flores agreement cannot be followed as it stands because it requires the separation of families, and that families must be held until their immigration hearings take place to ensure that they show up in court.
"The evidentiary record is unclear as to the accuracy of defendants' assertion," wrote Gee. "Even assuming defendants are correct, however, this risk was plainly contemplated by the parties when they executed the Flores agreement in 1997...It does not support a blanket non-release policy or warrant the agreement's modification."
"Sifting through the government's false narrative, the court clearly found that the Flores settlement has never resulted in the separation of families," Peter Schey, an attorney representing detained children, told CBS News. "President Trump needs to take responsibility for his own misguided policies."
"Today's decision reiterates that family detention has never been acceptable," said Efren C. Olivares, racial and economic justice director for the Texas Civil Rights Project, in a statement. "For weeks, we watched in horror as children have been ripped from their parents, but the remedy for family separation is not, and never will be, holding them indefinitely in detention facilities that are functionally prisons. We've seen today that the courts will not allow indefinite family detention to serve as the solution to this crisis manufactured by the Trump administration."
The decision represents the latest recent victory for immigrant rights advocates who have been fighting Trump's "zero tolerance" immigration policy and the separation of families. Over the weekend, a federal court denied Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar's request for an extension on the deadline to reunite families.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end," said Olivares.
The Families Belong Together coalition celebrated Gee's decision and reminded supporters to continue fighting Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
\u201cYES!!!! Flores upheld. This is a tiny, tiny bit of good news. #FamiliesBelongTogether #EndFamilyDetention https://t.co/xJ49ar9jL2\u201d— Immigrant Justice NOW (@Immigrant Justice NOW) 1531227097
\u201cIMPORTANT: This is a temporary victory. \n\nThis court decision is a positive step, but the administration will likely appeal it. \n\nAnd if it goes to the SCOTUS? We saw what happened with the #MuslimBan. \n\nhttps://t.co/xJ49ar9jL2\n\n#FamiliesBelongTogether\n#EndFamiliyDetention\u201d— Immigrant Justice NOW (@Immigrant Justice NOW) 1531227097
In the latest ruling against the president's cruel and inhumane border policy, a federal judge slammed the Trump administration's argument for changing a decades-old agreement limiting the amount of time a child can legally be detained by the government, calling the Justice Department's attempt to gain approval for its plan to detain families indefinitely "tortured" and "wholly without merit."
"Defendants seek to light a match to the Flores agreement and ask this court to upend the parties' agreement by judicial fiat," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee. "It is apparent that defendants' application is a cynical attempt...to shift responsibility to the judiciary for over 20 years of Congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate."
The Flores settlement agreement was decided in 1997, stipulating that children in immigrant detention centers can be held for no longer than 20 days.
The Trump administration moved to change the rule just after President Donald Trump reluctantly signed an executive order on June 20 to end forcible family separation, after the practice provoked international outcry.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end." --Efren C. Olivares, Texas Civil Rights Project
The government argued that the Flores agreement cannot be followed as it stands because it requires the separation of families, and that families must be held until their immigration hearings take place to ensure that they show up in court.
"The evidentiary record is unclear as to the accuracy of defendants' assertion," wrote Gee. "Even assuming defendants are correct, however, this risk was plainly contemplated by the parties when they executed the Flores agreement in 1997...It does not support a blanket non-release policy or warrant the agreement's modification."
"Sifting through the government's false narrative, the court clearly found that the Flores settlement has never resulted in the separation of families," Peter Schey, an attorney representing detained children, told CBS News. "President Trump needs to take responsibility for his own misguided policies."
"Today's decision reiterates that family detention has never been acceptable," said Efren C. Olivares, racial and economic justice director for the Texas Civil Rights Project, in a statement. "For weeks, we watched in horror as children have been ripped from their parents, but the remedy for family separation is not, and never will be, holding them indefinitely in detention facilities that are functionally prisons. We've seen today that the courts will not allow indefinite family detention to serve as the solution to this crisis manufactured by the Trump administration."
The decision represents the latest recent victory for immigrant rights advocates who have been fighting Trump's "zero tolerance" immigration policy and the separation of families. Over the weekend, a federal court denied Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar's request for an extension on the deadline to reunite families.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end," said Olivares.
The Families Belong Together coalition celebrated Gee's decision and reminded supporters to continue fighting Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
\u201cYES!!!! Flores upheld. This is a tiny, tiny bit of good news. #FamiliesBelongTogether #EndFamilyDetention https://t.co/xJ49ar9jL2\u201d— Immigrant Justice NOW (@Immigrant Justice NOW) 1531227097
\u201cIMPORTANT: This is a temporary victory. \n\nThis court decision is a positive step, but the administration will likely appeal it. \n\nAnd if it goes to the SCOTUS? We saw what happened with the #MuslimBan. \n\nhttps://t.co/xJ49ar9jL2\n\n#FamiliesBelongTogether\n#EndFamiliyDetention\u201d— Immigrant Justice NOW (@Immigrant Justice NOW) 1531227097
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.