SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A woman sits with her son at the Catholic Charities Humanitarian Respite Center in McAllen, Texas, shortly after crossing the U.S.-Mexico border. (Photo: Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
In Latest Victory for Immigrant Rights, Judge Rules Against Trump's Attempt to Tear Up Decades-Old Rule Limiting Child Detention
"President Trump needs to take responsibility for his own misguided policies."
Jul 10, 2018
In the latest ruling against the president's cruel and inhumane border policy, a federal judge slammed the Trump administration's argument for changing a decades-old agreement limiting the amount of time a child can legally be detained by the government, calling the Justice Department's attempt to gain approval for its plan to detain families indefinitely "tortured" and "wholly without merit."
"Defendants seek to light a match to the Flores agreement and ask this court to upend the parties' agreement by judicial fiat," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee. "It is apparent that defendants' application is a cynical attempt...to shift responsibility to the judiciary for over 20 years of Congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate."
The Flores settlement agreement was decided in 1997, stipulating that children in immigrant detention centers can be held for no longer than 20 days.
The Trump administration moved to change the rule just after President Donald Trump reluctantly signed an executive order on June 20 to end forcible family separation, after the practice provoked international outcry.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end." --Efren C. Olivares, Texas Civil Rights Project
The government argued that the Flores agreement cannot be followed as it stands because it requires the separation of families, and that families must be held until their immigration hearings take place to ensure that they show up in court.
"The evidentiary record is unclear as to the accuracy of defendants' assertion," wrote Gee. "Even assuming defendants are correct, however, this risk was plainly contemplated by the parties when they executed the Flores agreement in 1997...It does not support a blanket non-release policy or warrant the agreement's modification."
"Sifting through the government's false narrative, the court clearly found that the Flores settlement has never resulted in the separation of families," Peter Schey, an attorney representing detained children, told CBS News. "President Trump needs to take responsibility for his own misguided policies."
"Today's decision reiterates that family detention has never been acceptable," said Efren C. Olivares, racial and economic justice director for the Texas Civil Rights Project, in a statement. "For weeks, we watched in horror as children have been ripped from their parents, but the remedy for family separation is not, and never will be, holding them indefinitely in detention facilities that are functionally prisons. We've seen today that the courts will not allow indefinite family detention to serve as the solution to this crisis manufactured by the Trump administration."
The decision represents the latest recent victory for immigrant rights advocates who have been fighting Trump's "zero tolerance" immigration policy and the separation of families. Over the weekend, a federal court denied Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar's request for an extension on the deadline to reunite families.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end," said Olivares.
The Families Belong Together coalition celebrated Gee's decision and reminded supporters to continue fighting Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the latest ruling against the president's cruel and inhumane border policy, a federal judge slammed the Trump administration's argument for changing a decades-old agreement limiting the amount of time a child can legally be detained by the government, calling the Justice Department's attempt to gain approval for its plan to detain families indefinitely "tortured" and "wholly without merit."
"Defendants seek to light a match to the Flores agreement and ask this court to upend the parties' agreement by judicial fiat," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee. "It is apparent that defendants' application is a cynical attempt...to shift responsibility to the judiciary for over 20 years of Congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate."
The Flores settlement agreement was decided in 1997, stipulating that children in immigrant detention centers can be held for no longer than 20 days.
The Trump administration moved to change the rule just after President Donald Trump reluctantly signed an executive order on June 20 to end forcible family separation, after the practice provoked international outcry.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end." --Efren C. Olivares, Texas Civil Rights Project
The government argued that the Flores agreement cannot be followed as it stands because it requires the separation of families, and that families must be held until their immigration hearings take place to ensure that they show up in court.
"The evidentiary record is unclear as to the accuracy of defendants' assertion," wrote Gee. "Even assuming defendants are correct, however, this risk was plainly contemplated by the parties when they executed the Flores agreement in 1997...It does not support a blanket non-release policy or warrant the agreement's modification."
"Sifting through the government's false narrative, the court clearly found that the Flores settlement has never resulted in the separation of families," Peter Schey, an attorney representing detained children, told CBS News. "President Trump needs to take responsibility for his own misguided policies."
"Today's decision reiterates that family detention has never been acceptable," said Efren C. Olivares, racial and economic justice director for the Texas Civil Rights Project, in a statement. "For weeks, we watched in horror as children have been ripped from their parents, but the remedy for family separation is not, and never will be, holding them indefinitely in detention facilities that are functionally prisons. We've seen today that the courts will not allow indefinite family detention to serve as the solution to this crisis manufactured by the Trump administration."
The decision represents the latest recent victory for immigrant rights advocates who have been fighting Trump's "zero tolerance" immigration policy and the separation of families. Over the weekend, a federal court denied Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar's request for an extension on the deadline to reunite families.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end," said Olivares.
The Families Belong Together coalition celebrated Gee's decision and reminded supporters to continue fighting Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
In the latest ruling against the president's cruel and inhumane border policy, a federal judge slammed the Trump administration's argument for changing a decades-old agreement limiting the amount of time a child can legally be detained by the government, calling the Justice Department's attempt to gain approval for its plan to detain families indefinitely "tortured" and "wholly without merit."
"Defendants seek to light a match to the Flores agreement and ask this court to upend the parties' agreement by judicial fiat," wrote U.S. District Court Judge Dolly Gee. "It is apparent that defendants' application is a cynical attempt...to shift responsibility to the judiciary for over 20 years of Congressional inaction and ill-considered executive action that have led to the current stalemate."
The Flores settlement agreement was decided in 1997, stipulating that children in immigrant detention centers can be held for no longer than 20 days.
The Trump administration moved to change the rule just after President Donald Trump reluctantly signed an executive order on June 20 to end forcible family separation, after the practice provoked international outcry.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end." --Efren C. Olivares, Texas Civil Rights Project
The government argued that the Flores agreement cannot be followed as it stands because it requires the separation of families, and that families must be held until their immigration hearings take place to ensure that they show up in court.
"The evidentiary record is unclear as to the accuracy of defendants' assertion," wrote Gee. "Even assuming defendants are correct, however, this risk was plainly contemplated by the parties when they executed the Flores agreement in 1997...It does not support a blanket non-release policy or warrant the agreement's modification."
"Sifting through the government's false narrative, the court clearly found that the Flores settlement has never resulted in the separation of families," Peter Schey, an attorney representing detained children, told CBS News. "President Trump needs to take responsibility for his own misguided policies."
"Today's decision reiterates that family detention has never been acceptable," said Efren C. Olivares, racial and economic justice director for the Texas Civil Rights Project, in a statement. "For weeks, we watched in horror as children have been ripped from their parents, but the remedy for family separation is not, and never will be, holding them indefinitely in detention facilities that are functionally prisons. We've seen today that the courts will not allow indefinite family detention to serve as the solution to this crisis manufactured by the Trump administration."
The decision represents the latest recent victory for immigrant rights advocates who have been fighting Trump's "zero tolerance" immigration policy and the separation of families. Over the weekend, a federal court denied Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar's request for an extension on the deadline to reunite families.
"We cannot allow the administration to continue to push responsibility for the human rights crisis it created in every direction but its own. The administration must be held accountable for the horrors its created, and the zero tolerance policy must end," said Olivares.
The Families Belong Together coalition celebrated Gee's decision and reminded supporters to continue fighting Trump's anti-immigration agenda.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.