"The Trump administration's slavish devotion to corporate profits and their contempt for the health and well-being of Americans and people throughout the world is beyond appalling," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote. (Photo: National People's Action/flickr)
Bernie Sanders: Trump Attack on Breastfeeding Resolution Shows White House's "Slavish Devotion to Corporate Profits"
The Vermont senator said the administration's attempt to undercut the World Health Assembly resolution also further displays the White House's "contempt for the health and well-being of Americans and people throughout the world."
After reporting by the New York Times on Sunday detailed the Trump administration's attempt to reward infant formula manufacturers by opposing a World Health Assembly resolution that called on nations to "protect, promote, and support breastfeeding" as the healthiest option for children, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the White House's efforts clearly show its "slavish devotion to corporate profits."
The Trump administration's attempts to "water down" the resolution, as well as its threats to withdraw aid from nations that supported it, also provide further evidence of the White House's "contempt for the health and well-being of Americans and people throughout the world," Sanders argued.
The resolution was ultimately approved even in the face of U.S. opposition, but the Trump administration successfully stripped out language that called for the World Health Organization to support nations working to crack down on "inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children."
"We need a government willing to counter misinformation from the baby food and formula industry, not one that caters to it."
--Dr. Gretchen Goldman, Union of Concerned Scientists
As an investigation by the Guardian and Save the Children published in February makes clear, such inappropriate and deceptive promotion is pervasive in poor nations, where companies like Nestle and Mead Johnson deploy "aggressive, clandestine, and often illegal methods to target mothers" and "encourage them to choose powdered milk over breastfeeding."
"Representatives from Nestle, Abbott, Mead Johnson, and Wyeth (now owned by Nestle) were described as a constant presence in hospitals in the Philippines, where only 34 percent of mothers exclusively breastfeed in the first six months," the investigation found. "Here, they reportedly hand out 'infant nutrition' pamphlets to mothers, which appear to be medical advice but in fact recommend specific formula brands and sometimes have money-off coupons."
Dr. Gretchen Goldman, research director with the Union of Concerned Scientists, concluded that the Trump administration's attempts to block the breastfeeding resolution "goes against the science and doesn't bode well for the baby food/formula industry's influence on the upcoming dietary guidelines process."
"We need a government willing to counter misinformation from the baby food and formula industry, not one that caters to it," Goldman wrote on Twitter.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
After reporting by the New York Times on Sunday detailed the Trump administration's attempt to reward infant formula manufacturers by opposing a World Health Assembly resolution that called on nations to "protect, promote, and support breastfeeding" as the healthiest option for children, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the White House's efforts clearly show its "slavish devotion to corporate profits."
The Trump administration's attempts to "water down" the resolution, as well as its threats to withdraw aid from nations that supported it, also provide further evidence of the White House's "contempt for the health and well-being of Americans and people throughout the world," Sanders argued.
The resolution was ultimately approved even in the face of U.S. opposition, but the Trump administration successfully stripped out language that called for the World Health Organization to support nations working to crack down on "inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children."
"We need a government willing to counter misinformation from the baby food and formula industry, not one that caters to it."
--Dr. Gretchen Goldman, Union of Concerned Scientists
As an investigation by the Guardian and Save the Children published in February makes clear, such inappropriate and deceptive promotion is pervasive in poor nations, where companies like Nestle and Mead Johnson deploy "aggressive, clandestine, and often illegal methods to target mothers" and "encourage them to choose powdered milk over breastfeeding."
"Representatives from Nestle, Abbott, Mead Johnson, and Wyeth (now owned by Nestle) were described as a constant presence in hospitals in the Philippines, where only 34 percent of mothers exclusively breastfeed in the first six months," the investigation found. "Here, they reportedly hand out 'infant nutrition' pamphlets to mothers, which appear to be medical advice but in fact recommend specific formula brands and sometimes have money-off coupons."
Dr. Gretchen Goldman, research director with the Union of Concerned Scientists, concluded that the Trump administration's attempts to block the breastfeeding resolution "goes against the science and doesn't bode well for the baby food/formula industry's influence on the upcoming dietary guidelines process."
"We need a government willing to counter misinformation from the baby food and formula industry, not one that caters to it," Goldman wrote on Twitter.
After reporting by the New York Times on Sunday detailed the Trump administration's attempt to reward infant formula manufacturers by opposing a World Health Assembly resolution that called on nations to "protect, promote, and support breastfeeding" as the healthiest option for children, Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said the White House's efforts clearly show its "slavish devotion to corporate profits."
The Trump administration's attempts to "water down" the resolution, as well as its threats to withdraw aid from nations that supported it, also provide further evidence of the White House's "contempt for the health and well-being of Americans and people throughout the world," Sanders argued.
The resolution was ultimately approved even in the face of U.S. opposition, but the Trump administration successfully stripped out language that called for the World Health Organization to support nations working to crack down on "inappropriate promotion of foods for infants and young children."
"We need a government willing to counter misinformation from the baby food and formula industry, not one that caters to it."
--Dr. Gretchen Goldman, Union of Concerned Scientists
As an investigation by the Guardian and Save the Children published in February makes clear, such inappropriate and deceptive promotion is pervasive in poor nations, where companies like Nestle and Mead Johnson deploy "aggressive, clandestine, and often illegal methods to target mothers" and "encourage them to choose powdered milk over breastfeeding."
"Representatives from Nestle, Abbott, Mead Johnson, and Wyeth (now owned by Nestle) were described as a constant presence in hospitals in the Philippines, where only 34 percent of mothers exclusively breastfeed in the first six months," the investigation found. "Here, they reportedly hand out 'infant nutrition' pamphlets to mothers, which appear to be medical advice but in fact recommend specific formula brands and sometimes have money-off coupons."
Dr. Gretchen Goldman, research director with the Union of Concerned Scientists, concluded that the Trump administration's attempts to block the breastfeeding resolution "goes against the science and doesn't bode well for the baby food/formula industry's influence on the upcoming dietary guidelines process."
"We need a government willing to counter misinformation from the baby food and formula industry, not one that caters to it," Goldman wrote on Twitter.