SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"If the federal government won't protect the internet, California will," said state Sen. Scott Wiener. (Photo: Free Press/ Free Press Action Fund/flickr/cc)
Team Internet Wins as California Bill Regains Key Net Neutrality Protections
Legislation that had been "eviscerated" just weeks ago sees key provisions restored—a development advocacy groups attribute to people power
Jul 06, 2018
Open internet advocates are cheering after California lawmakers on Thursday reached a deal on proposed legislation that puts the state on the path to having the strongest net neutrality bill in the nation.
The news, said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, "shows the power of the internet to overcome business as usual and win real victories for the public."
As the San Jose Mercury News sums up,
The effort in California, headed by state Sens. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, and Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, seemed doomed after an Assembly committee effectively gutted SB822, Wiener's bill, a couple of weeks ago. De Leon had agreed to pair his bill, SB460, with Wiener's bill, but Assemblyman Miguel Santiago, D-Los Angeles, objected and introduced amendments to weaken SB822.
Wiener in fact declared that it became "a fake net neutrality " bill after being "mutilated" by the industry-friendly provisions of Santiago's amendments.
That development, as Katharine Trendacosta, policy analysts at the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes, sparked "an outcry from Team Internet in California, making clear how important effective, strong net neutrality protections are."
Wiener, de Leon, Santiago, and assemblymember Rob Bonta (D) were able to come together, though, to hammer out a new proposal that consolidates the two bills into one package. As Trendacosta explains, the combination goes a long way to restore the protections the large Internet Service Providers (ISPs), like Verizon and Comcast, had wanted removed:
The ban on blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization remains--paid prioritization has been a particular target of misleading ISP arguments. The ban on certain kinds of zero rating--the kinds that lead consumers to services that ISPs want them to use rather than giving them choices--also remains. And so does the ban on access fees, which means ISPs will not be able to get around these protections by charging fees at the places where data enters their networks.
"This is what real net neutrality looks like," she adds. "And it all happened because people spoke out. You sent emails, called offices, crowdfunded a billboard--all of that was heard. People's voices trumped company money this time."
Wiener, for his part, tweeted that SB822 "will have its strong protections reinstated" and "will be the strongest net neutrality law in the U.S."
"If the federal government won't protect the internet, California will," he said.
"After Donald Trump's FCC obliterated net neutrality," Wiener added in a statement, "we stepped in to protect California residents and businesses and to ensure an open internet. For months, we have worked with a broad coalition to pass strong and enforceable net neutrality protections. As internet service providers and media companies like AT&T and Time Warner consolidate, net neutrality is more important than ever."
The bill still needs approval from the legislature by the end of August, after which it would head to Gov. Jerry Brown's desk.
With that deadline in mind, Fight for the Future is encouraging constituents to call state assembly members to make sure they support the bill. "Let's keep the fight going!" the group says.
Another group applauding the new proposal is the Center for Media Justice, which stressed the importance of net neutrality to confront "the rising authoritarianism of the Trump administration."
"We are in a moment of crisis in this country with a federal administration that has demonstrated its capacity for inhumanity," Steven Renderos, the group's organizing director, said Friday. "Against this backdrop, the ability of marginalized people to dissent is of greater urgency than ever. We cannot fight to end the separation of families and to #AbolishICE if we can't be heard online."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Open internet advocates are cheering after California lawmakers on Thursday reached a deal on proposed legislation that puts the state on the path to having the strongest net neutrality bill in the nation.
The news, said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, "shows the power of the internet to overcome business as usual and win real victories for the public."
As the San Jose Mercury News sums up,
The effort in California, headed by state Sens. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, and Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, seemed doomed after an Assembly committee effectively gutted SB822, Wiener's bill, a couple of weeks ago. De Leon had agreed to pair his bill, SB460, with Wiener's bill, but Assemblyman Miguel Santiago, D-Los Angeles, objected and introduced amendments to weaken SB822.
Wiener in fact declared that it became "a fake net neutrality " bill after being "mutilated" by the industry-friendly provisions of Santiago's amendments.
That development, as Katharine Trendacosta, policy analysts at the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes, sparked "an outcry from Team Internet in California, making clear how important effective, strong net neutrality protections are."
Wiener, de Leon, Santiago, and assemblymember Rob Bonta (D) were able to come together, though, to hammer out a new proposal that consolidates the two bills into one package. As Trendacosta explains, the combination goes a long way to restore the protections the large Internet Service Providers (ISPs), like Verizon and Comcast, had wanted removed:
The ban on blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization remains--paid prioritization has been a particular target of misleading ISP arguments. The ban on certain kinds of zero rating--the kinds that lead consumers to services that ISPs want them to use rather than giving them choices--also remains. And so does the ban on access fees, which means ISPs will not be able to get around these protections by charging fees at the places where data enters their networks.
"This is what real net neutrality looks like," she adds. "And it all happened because people spoke out. You sent emails, called offices, crowdfunded a billboard--all of that was heard. People's voices trumped company money this time."
Wiener, for his part, tweeted that SB822 "will have its strong protections reinstated" and "will be the strongest net neutrality law in the U.S."
"If the federal government won't protect the internet, California will," he said.
"After Donald Trump's FCC obliterated net neutrality," Wiener added in a statement, "we stepped in to protect California residents and businesses and to ensure an open internet. For months, we have worked with a broad coalition to pass strong and enforceable net neutrality protections. As internet service providers and media companies like AT&T and Time Warner consolidate, net neutrality is more important than ever."
The bill still needs approval from the legislature by the end of August, after which it would head to Gov. Jerry Brown's desk.
With that deadline in mind, Fight for the Future is encouraging constituents to call state assembly members to make sure they support the bill. "Let's keep the fight going!" the group says.
Another group applauding the new proposal is the Center for Media Justice, which stressed the importance of net neutrality to confront "the rising authoritarianism of the Trump administration."
"We are in a moment of crisis in this country with a federal administration that has demonstrated its capacity for inhumanity," Steven Renderos, the group's organizing director, said Friday. "Against this backdrop, the ability of marginalized people to dissent is of greater urgency than ever. We cannot fight to end the separation of families and to #AbolishICE if we can't be heard online."
Open internet advocates are cheering after California lawmakers on Thursday reached a deal on proposed legislation that puts the state on the path to having the strongest net neutrality bill in the nation.
The news, said Evan Greer, deputy director of Fight for the Future, "shows the power of the internet to overcome business as usual and win real victories for the public."
As the San Jose Mercury News sums up,
The effort in California, headed by state Sens. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, and Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles, seemed doomed after an Assembly committee effectively gutted SB822, Wiener's bill, a couple of weeks ago. De Leon had agreed to pair his bill, SB460, with Wiener's bill, but Assemblyman Miguel Santiago, D-Los Angeles, objected and introduced amendments to weaken SB822.
Wiener in fact declared that it became "a fake net neutrality " bill after being "mutilated" by the industry-friendly provisions of Santiago's amendments.
That development, as Katharine Trendacosta, policy analysts at the Electronic Frontier Foundation writes, sparked "an outcry from Team Internet in California, making clear how important effective, strong net neutrality protections are."
Wiener, de Leon, Santiago, and assemblymember Rob Bonta (D) were able to come together, though, to hammer out a new proposal that consolidates the two bills into one package. As Trendacosta explains, the combination goes a long way to restore the protections the large Internet Service Providers (ISPs), like Verizon and Comcast, had wanted removed:
The ban on blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization remains--paid prioritization has been a particular target of misleading ISP arguments. The ban on certain kinds of zero rating--the kinds that lead consumers to services that ISPs want them to use rather than giving them choices--also remains. And so does the ban on access fees, which means ISPs will not be able to get around these protections by charging fees at the places where data enters their networks.
"This is what real net neutrality looks like," she adds. "And it all happened because people spoke out. You sent emails, called offices, crowdfunded a billboard--all of that was heard. People's voices trumped company money this time."
Wiener, for his part, tweeted that SB822 "will have its strong protections reinstated" and "will be the strongest net neutrality law in the U.S."
"If the federal government won't protect the internet, California will," he said.
"After Donald Trump's FCC obliterated net neutrality," Wiener added in a statement, "we stepped in to protect California residents and businesses and to ensure an open internet. For months, we have worked with a broad coalition to pass strong and enforceable net neutrality protections. As internet service providers and media companies like AT&T and Time Warner consolidate, net neutrality is more important than ever."
The bill still needs approval from the legislature by the end of August, after which it would head to Gov. Jerry Brown's desk.
With that deadline in mind, Fight for the Future is encouraging constituents to call state assembly members to make sure they support the bill. "Let's keep the fight going!" the group says.
Another group applauding the new proposal is the Center for Media Justice, which stressed the importance of net neutrality to confront "the rising authoritarianism of the Trump administration."
"We are in a moment of crisis in this country with a federal administration that has demonstrated its capacity for inhumanity," Steven Renderos, the group's organizing director, said Friday. "Against this backdrop, the ability of marginalized people to dissent is of greater urgency than ever. We cannot fight to end the separation of families and to #AbolishICE if we can't be heard online."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.