

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, photographed in the Bronx, N.Y., on April 21, 2018. (Photo: Andres Kudacki for The Intercept)
Today, the Fourth of July, is a good time to think about the First Amendment -- and the possibility that journalism, at least as it's traditionally produced by liberals and progressives, is often a barrier to the creation of a better country. There's a better way to do it, and we can thank Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for pointing it out.
The left-of-center worldview is: People are mostly good and can be trusted to govern themselves, and what they do that's bad is largely due to poorly designed institutions and malevolent individuals who take advantage of them. This has the benefit of being true and encouraging - yes, we can.
Now imagine you came to visit Earth from your home planet of Gliese 832c to finish your master's thesis on "Journalism Produced by the Lefties." Your space-brain would instantaneously ingest a year's worth of the best American investigative reporting, which is to say, 1,000 lovingly detailed, beautifully designed dissections of human depravity. And you'd conclude that the conservative worldview -- i.e., people are mostly awful -- was the right one.
The hearts of self-consciously progressive writers everywhere will cry out against this. (I know mine does.) The whole reason we're doing this is for the chance to righteously expose awful people doing terrible things, while also getting reimbursed for our copy of Microsoft Office.
But any honest look at the U.S. today suggests that there are limits to this as a life mission. Reporters have ripped the lid off Donald Trump so many times that it's incredible America has any lids left. Never before has there been as much information available about corruption and idiocy and corrupt idiots at the highest levels of U.S. society. But nothing much seems to change.
So it may be time to consider whether this type of journalism is, at least when pursued by progressives to the exclusion of other approaches, an elaborate form of self-sabotage.
Consider what's necessary for progressives to succeed. It's great for the conservative worldview if all Americans ever hear is that people in general are dreadful and politicians in particular are tricksy vampires. But for the progressive worldview to have a fighting chance, we need to broadcast the exact opposite: that public life is full of individuals who are trustworthy and honorable, and even many of the vampires would be redeemable in a world with better incentives. Politics isn't necessarily an open sewer. The idea of a common good seems like an illusory sham until the moment enough of us believe in it simultaneously.
Read the full story at The Intercept.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Today, the Fourth of July, is a good time to think about the First Amendment -- and the possibility that journalism, at least as it's traditionally produced by liberals and progressives, is often a barrier to the creation of a better country. There's a better way to do it, and we can thank Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for pointing it out.
The left-of-center worldview is: People are mostly good and can be trusted to govern themselves, and what they do that's bad is largely due to poorly designed institutions and malevolent individuals who take advantage of them. This has the benefit of being true and encouraging - yes, we can.
Now imagine you came to visit Earth from your home planet of Gliese 832c to finish your master's thesis on "Journalism Produced by the Lefties." Your space-brain would instantaneously ingest a year's worth of the best American investigative reporting, which is to say, 1,000 lovingly detailed, beautifully designed dissections of human depravity. And you'd conclude that the conservative worldview -- i.e., people are mostly awful -- was the right one.
The hearts of self-consciously progressive writers everywhere will cry out against this. (I know mine does.) The whole reason we're doing this is for the chance to righteously expose awful people doing terrible things, while also getting reimbursed for our copy of Microsoft Office.
But any honest look at the U.S. today suggests that there are limits to this as a life mission. Reporters have ripped the lid off Donald Trump so many times that it's incredible America has any lids left. Never before has there been as much information available about corruption and idiocy and corrupt idiots at the highest levels of U.S. society. But nothing much seems to change.
So it may be time to consider whether this type of journalism is, at least when pursued by progressives to the exclusion of other approaches, an elaborate form of self-sabotage.
Consider what's necessary for progressives to succeed. It's great for the conservative worldview if all Americans ever hear is that people in general are dreadful and politicians in particular are tricksy vampires. But for the progressive worldview to have a fighting chance, we need to broadcast the exact opposite: that public life is full of individuals who are trustworthy and honorable, and even many of the vampires would be redeemable in a world with better incentives. Politics isn't necessarily an open sewer. The idea of a common good seems like an illusory sham until the moment enough of us believe in it simultaneously.
Read the full story at The Intercept.
Today, the Fourth of July, is a good time to think about the First Amendment -- and the possibility that journalism, at least as it's traditionally produced by liberals and progressives, is often a barrier to the creation of a better country. There's a better way to do it, and we can thank Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez for pointing it out.
The left-of-center worldview is: People are mostly good and can be trusted to govern themselves, and what they do that's bad is largely due to poorly designed institutions and malevolent individuals who take advantage of them. This has the benefit of being true and encouraging - yes, we can.
Now imagine you came to visit Earth from your home planet of Gliese 832c to finish your master's thesis on "Journalism Produced by the Lefties." Your space-brain would instantaneously ingest a year's worth of the best American investigative reporting, which is to say, 1,000 lovingly detailed, beautifully designed dissections of human depravity. And you'd conclude that the conservative worldview -- i.e., people are mostly awful -- was the right one.
The hearts of self-consciously progressive writers everywhere will cry out against this. (I know mine does.) The whole reason we're doing this is for the chance to righteously expose awful people doing terrible things, while also getting reimbursed for our copy of Microsoft Office.
But any honest look at the U.S. today suggests that there are limits to this as a life mission. Reporters have ripped the lid off Donald Trump so many times that it's incredible America has any lids left. Never before has there been as much information available about corruption and idiocy and corrupt idiots at the highest levels of U.S. society. But nothing much seems to change.
So it may be time to consider whether this type of journalism is, at least when pursued by progressives to the exclusion of other approaches, an elaborate form of self-sabotage.
Consider what's necessary for progressives to succeed. It's great for the conservative worldview if all Americans ever hear is that people in general are dreadful and politicians in particular are tricksy vampires. But for the progressive worldview to have a fighting chance, we need to broadcast the exact opposite: that public life is full of individuals who are trustworthy and honorable, and even many of the vampires would be redeemable in a world with better incentives. Politics isn't necessarily an open sewer. The idea of a common good seems like an illusory sham until the moment enough of us believe in it simultaneously.
Read the full story at The Intercept.