Facebook struck data-sharing deals with the makers of cell phones and other devices, and continued those relationships even after prohibiting tech developers from accessing users' friends' data. (Photo: Chesnot/Getty Images)
Jun 04, 2018
At least one member of Congress regarded new information about Facebook's data-sharing partnerships with tech companies as evidence that the company's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, lied to lawmakers in April about the control users have over their information on the social media platform.
\u201cSure looks like Zuckerberg lied to Congress about whether users have \u201ccomplete control\u201d over who sees our data on Facebook. This needs to be investigated and the people responsible need to be held accountable. https://t.co/rshBsxy32G\u201d— David Cicilline (@David Cicilline) 1528080797
The New York Timesreported Sunday that Facebook formed deals with at least 60 makers of cell phones and other devices allowing them access to users' personal information and that of their Facebook friends, without explicit consent.
Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Samsung were among the companies Facebook reached agreements with, allowing the companies to access users' relationship status, religion, political views, and upcoming events they attend.
The deals may have breached Facebook's compliance with a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ordering the company to keep users' information private.
The companies' access remained in tact even after Facebook realized in 2015 that the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica had exploited its access to tens of millions of users' personal information.
Facebook has faced intense scrutiny in recent months over the Trump-linked firm's profiling of U.S. voters in order to target them with personalized political ads, using personal information it obtained from Facebook.
Facebook prohibited tech developers from accessing the data of users' friends after discovering the Cambridge Analytica breach in 2015, but the makers of cell phones and other devices were not subject to the restriction.
"It's like having door locks installed, only to find out that the locksmith also gave keys to all of his friends so they can come in and rifle through your stuff without having to ask you for permission," Ashkan Soltani, a research and privacy consultant, told the Times of the new revelations.
The Cambridge Analytica controversy led lawmakers to demand that Zuckerberg testify before two Congressional committees in April, during which he claimed, "Every piece of content that you share on Facebook you own. You have complete control over who sees it and how you share it."
Sandy Parakalis, a former advertising and privacy official at Facebook who left the company in 2012 and has raised concerns over its use of users' data, posted on twitter about Zuckerberg's earlier statements and urged lawmakers to hold the CEO accountable for the newly uncovered privacy breach.
\u201c6/ And this April, Mark Zuckerberg told Congress: "So now, when people sign in to an app, you do not bring some of your friends' information with you. You're only bringing your own information and you're able to connect with friends who have also authorized that app directly."\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
\u201c7/ This statement to Congress was not correct. Some apps (these device makers) still have access to friend data. Even users who had turned platform off to avoid this kind of abusive data collection could have their data accessed, the Times found, a serious violation of privacy.\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
\u201c8/ This wasn't a small misstatement -- the crux of Facebook's argument was that they fixed the friend permission problem in 2014. They shouldn't be allowed to qualify that now after getting caught breaking their promise. Lawmakers must hold Facebook accountable.\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
At least one member of Congress regarded new information about Facebook's data-sharing partnerships with tech companies as evidence that the company's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, lied to lawmakers in April about the control users have over their information on the social media platform.
\u201cSure looks like Zuckerberg lied to Congress about whether users have \u201ccomplete control\u201d over who sees our data on Facebook. This needs to be investigated and the people responsible need to be held accountable. https://t.co/rshBsxy32G\u201d— David Cicilline (@David Cicilline) 1528080797
The New York Timesreported Sunday that Facebook formed deals with at least 60 makers of cell phones and other devices allowing them access to users' personal information and that of their Facebook friends, without explicit consent.
Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Samsung were among the companies Facebook reached agreements with, allowing the companies to access users' relationship status, religion, political views, and upcoming events they attend.
The deals may have breached Facebook's compliance with a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ordering the company to keep users' information private.
The companies' access remained in tact even after Facebook realized in 2015 that the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica had exploited its access to tens of millions of users' personal information.
Facebook has faced intense scrutiny in recent months over the Trump-linked firm's profiling of U.S. voters in order to target them with personalized political ads, using personal information it obtained from Facebook.
Facebook prohibited tech developers from accessing the data of users' friends after discovering the Cambridge Analytica breach in 2015, but the makers of cell phones and other devices were not subject to the restriction.
"It's like having door locks installed, only to find out that the locksmith also gave keys to all of his friends so they can come in and rifle through your stuff without having to ask you for permission," Ashkan Soltani, a research and privacy consultant, told the Times of the new revelations.
The Cambridge Analytica controversy led lawmakers to demand that Zuckerberg testify before two Congressional committees in April, during which he claimed, "Every piece of content that you share on Facebook you own. You have complete control over who sees it and how you share it."
Sandy Parakalis, a former advertising and privacy official at Facebook who left the company in 2012 and has raised concerns over its use of users' data, posted on twitter about Zuckerberg's earlier statements and urged lawmakers to hold the CEO accountable for the newly uncovered privacy breach.
\u201c6/ And this April, Mark Zuckerberg told Congress: "So now, when people sign in to an app, you do not bring some of your friends' information with you. You're only bringing your own information and you're able to connect with friends who have also authorized that app directly."\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
\u201c7/ This statement to Congress was not correct. Some apps (these device makers) still have access to friend data. Even users who had turned platform off to avoid this kind of abusive data collection could have their data accessed, the Times found, a serious violation of privacy.\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
\u201c8/ This wasn't a small misstatement -- the crux of Facebook's argument was that they fixed the friend permission problem in 2014. They shouldn't be allowed to qualify that now after getting caught breaking their promise. Lawmakers must hold Facebook accountable.\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
At least one member of Congress regarded new information about Facebook's data-sharing partnerships with tech companies as evidence that the company's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, lied to lawmakers in April about the control users have over their information on the social media platform.
\u201cSure looks like Zuckerberg lied to Congress about whether users have \u201ccomplete control\u201d over who sees our data on Facebook. This needs to be investigated and the people responsible need to be held accountable. https://t.co/rshBsxy32G\u201d— David Cicilline (@David Cicilline) 1528080797
The New York Timesreported Sunday that Facebook formed deals with at least 60 makers of cell phones and other devices allowing them access to users' personal information and that of their Facebook friends, without explicit consent.
Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Samsung were among the companies Facebook reached agreements with, allowing the companies to access users' relationship status, religion, political views, and upcoming events they attend.
The deals may have breached Facebook's compliance with a 2011 agreement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) ordering the company to keep users' information private.
The companies' access remained in tact even after Facebook realized in 2015 that the political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica had exploited its access to tens of millions of users' personal information.
Facebook has faced intense scrutiny in recent months over the Trump-linked firm's profiling of U.S. voters in order to target them with personalized political ads, using personal information it obtained from Facebook.
Facebook prohibited tech developers from accessing the data of users' friends after discovering the Cambridge Analytica breach in 2015, but the makers of cell phones and other devices were not subject to the restriction.
"It's like having door locks installed, only to find out that the locksmith also gave keys to all of his friends so they can come in and rifle through your stuff without having to ask you for permission," Ashkan Soltani, a research and privacy consultant, told the Times of the new revelations.
The Cambridge Analytica controversy led lawmakers to demand that Zuckerberg testify before two Congressional committees in April, during which he claimed, "Every piece of content that you share on Facebook you own. You have complete control over who sees it and how you share it."
Sandy Parakalis, a former advertising and privacy official at Facebook who left the company in 2012 and has raised concerns over its use of users' data, posted on twitter about Zuckerberg's earlier statements and urged lawmakers to hold the CEO accountable for the newly uncovered privacy breach.
\u201c6/ And this April, Mark Zuckerberg told Congress: "So now, when people sign in to an app, you do not bring some of your friends' information with you. You're only bringing your own information and you're able to connect with friends who have also authorized that app directly."\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
\u201c7/ This statement to Congress was not correct. Some apps (these device makers) still have access to friend data. Even users who had turned platform off to avoid this kind of abusive data collection could have their data accessed, the Times found, a serious violation of privacy.\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
\u201c8/ This wasn't a small misstatement -- the crux of Facebook's argument was that they fixed the friend permission problem in 2014. They shouldn't be allowed to qualify that now after getting caught breaking their promise. Lawmakers must hold Facebook accountable.\u201d— Sandy Parakilas (@Sandy Parakilas) 1528098245
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.