SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A woman sorts through tokens used by the poor on public food assistance programs to buy fresh food at the Hattie Carthan Community Market in Brooklyn, New York. (Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty Images)
Though White Americans Benefit Most From Social Safety Net, Study Shows How Racial Resentment Can Fuel Welfare Opposition
"Whites' perceptions that minorities' standing is rising can produce periods of 'welfare backlash' in which adoption of policies restricting or curtailing welfare programs is more likely," warns researcher
May 31, 2018
Mistaken beliefs about who benefits most from the social safety net has led white Americans to oppose programs like Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as food stamps), and other government assistance initiatives in greater numbers--and could trigger the further weakening of such programs, according to a new study.
In a study titled "Privilege on the Precipice," published in the journal Social Forces, researchers at Stanford University and UC Berkeley reported that across the political spectrum and socioeconomic statuses, white opposition to social welfare programs has risen sharply since 2008.
A major correlation to this opposition was the incorrect belief that minorities use Medicaid, SNAP benefits, and other programs more than white Americans. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Department of Agriculture, 43 percent of Medicaid recipients and more than 36 percent of SNAP beneficiaries are white--by far the largest percentage in terms of racial demographics.
"My main hope here is that people take a step back, look at what these sorts of programs do for the poor, and think about what's driving opposition to them," Rachel Wetts, a sociology researcher at UC Berkeley, told the Washington Post.
Wetts and Stanford University sociologist Robb Willer analyzed white Americans' attitudes regarding the social safety net beginning in 2008 and found that over the same time period, racial resentment among whites also rose. As Caitlin Dewey at the Post wrote:
To determine if there was a connection, Wetts and Willer designed two more experiments: one in which they quizzed respondents on their feelings about welfare after seeing a graph about U.S. demographic change, and another in which respondents took a similar quiz after viewing information on average income by race and the demographics of welfare beneficiaries.
In both instances, opposition to the social safety net overall went up among the respondents.
While the concerns of some white voters over changing demographics have been tied to President Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 election, and could impact upcoming policymaking, according to the Post, as the House prepares to vote on work requirements for SNAP recipients and a plan to cut the program by $9 million. Several states have already received federal approval for such stipulations for Medicaid.
"Whites' perceptions that minorities' standing is rising can produce periods of 'welfare backlash' in which adoption of policies restricting or curtailing welfare programs is more likely," wrote Wetts and Willer.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Mistaken beliefs about who benefits most from the social safety net has led white Americans to oppose programs like Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as food stamps), and other government assistance initiatives in greater numbers--and could trigger the further weakening of such programs, according to a new study.
In a study titled "Privilege on the Precipice," published in the journal Social Forces, researchers at Stanford University and UC Berkeley reported that across the political spectrum and socioeconomic statuses, white opposition to social welfare programs has risen sharply since 2008.
A major correlation to this opposition was the incorrect belief that minorities use Medicaid, SNAP benefits, and other programs more than white Americans. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Department of Agriculture, 43 percent of Medicaid recipients and more than 36 percent of SNAP beneficiaries are white--by far the largest percentage in terms of racial demographics.
"My main hope here is that people take a step back, look at what these sorts of programs do for the poor, and think about what's driving opposition to them," Rachel Wetts, a sociology researcher at UC Berkeley, told the Washington Post.
Wetts and Stanford University sociologist Robb Willer analyzed white Americans' attitudes regarding the social safety net beginning in 2008 and found that over the same time period, racial resentment among whites also rose. As Caitlin Dewey at the Post wrote:
To determine if there was a connection, Wetts and Willer designed two more experiments: one in which they quizzed respondents on their feelings about welfare after seeing a graph about U.S. demographic change, and another in which respondents took a similar quiz after viewing information on average income by race and the demographics of welfare beneficiaries.
In both instances, opposition to the social safety net overall went up among the respondents.
While the concerns of some white voters over changing demographics have been tied to President Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 election, and could impact upcoming policymaking, according to the Post, as the House prepares to vote on work requirements for SNAP recipients and a plan to cut the program by $9 million. Several states have already received federal approval for such stipulations for Medicaid.
"Whites' perceptions that minorities' standing is rising can produce periods of 'welfare backlash' in which adoption of policies restricting or curtailing welfare programs is more likely," wrote Wetts and Willer.
Mistaken beliefs about who benefits most from the social safety net has led white Americans to oppose programs like Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP, also known as food stamps), and other government assistance initiatives in greater numbers--and could trigger the further weakening of such programs, according to a new study.
In a study titled "Privilege on the Precipice," published in the journal Social Forces, researchers at Stanford University and UC Berkeley reported that across the political spectrum and socioeconomic statuses, white opposition to social welfare programs has risen sharply since 2008.
A major correlation to this opposition was the incorrect belief that minorities use Medicaid, SNAP benefits, and other programs more than white Americans. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Department of Agriculture, 43 percent of Medicaid recipients and more than 36 percent of SNAP beneficiaries are white--by far the largest percentage in terms of racial demographics.
"My main hope here is that people take a step back, look at what these sorts of programs do for the poor, and think about what's driving opposition to them," Rachel Wetts, a sociology researcher at UC Berkeley, told the Washington Post.
Wetts and Stanford University sociologist Robb Willer analyzed white Americans' attitudes regarding the social safety net beginning in 2008 and found that over the same time period, racial resentment among whites also rose. As Caitlin Dewey at the Post wrote:
To determine if there was a connection, Wetts and Willer designed two more experiments: one in which they quizzed respondents on their feelings about welfare after seeing a graph about U.S. demographic change, and another in which respondents took a similar quiz after viewing information on average income by race and the demographics of welfare beneficiaries.
In both instances, opposition to the social safety net overall went up among the respondents.
While the concerns of some white voters over changing demographics have been tied to President Donald Trump's victory in the 2016 election, and could impact upcoming policymaking, according to the Post, as the House prepares to vote on work requirements for SNAP recipients and a plan to cut the program by $9 million. Several states have already received federal approval for such stipulations for Medicaid.
"Whites' perceptions that minorities' standing is rising can produce periods of 'welfare backlash' in which adoption of policies restricting or curtailing welfare programs is more likely," wrote Wetts and Willer.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.