SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Attorney General Jeff Sessions will forbid immigration judges' use of administrative closure, which has allowed judges to delay immigration decisions while immigrants await visa application approvals and other resolutions. (Photo: Office of Public Affairs/Flickr/cc)
Sessions Takes Away 'Lifeline' for Tens of Thousands of Immigrants, Setting Stage for Quick Deportations
"This is yet another attempt by Sessions and the Trump administration to rob our immigration courts of due process."
May 18, 2018
Immigrant rights advocates raised concerns on Friday about a decision reached by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, forbidding immigration judges from delaying hearings while immigrants await resolutions that could affect their cases--including their pending applications for visas and green cards. The move could reopen hundreds of thousands of deportation cases and result in the swift removal of many immigrants from the country.
Sessions issued the directive on Thursday, saying that judges' closing of cases through a practice called administrative closure "effectively resulted in illegal aliens remaining indefinitely in the United States without any formal legal status."
Critics say the decision was made only to further the Trump administration's goal of maximizing deportations.
"We know he is part of Trump's political agenda to rush cases through the system," Trina Realmuto of the American Immigration Council told the Huffington Post of Sessions. "But as the attorney general, as the head of the Department of Justice, as the person who is certifying immigration cases to himself, he needs to be neutral, impartial and he needs to adjudicate without a political agenda."
Immigration judges have for years used administrative closure to delay court proceedings if an immigrant is awaiting approval of a visa application or appealing a criminal conviction, as outcomes of such proceedings could affect their immigration cases.
NPR's Joel Rose described administrative closure as "a lifeline for tens of thousands of immigrants," whose applications for visas and green cards can take years.
"So immigration judges will sometimes close their cases to let those applications play out, effectively putting deportations on hold," he said.
Other matters beyond immigrants' control have also driven judges to put hearings on hold. Sessions based his decision on three cases including one involving a Guatemalan immigrant, Reynaldo Castro-Tum, who arrived in the U.S. as a minor. Castro-Tum failed to appear at five immigration hearings, and the judge overseeing the case ordered administrative closure after determining "that the government's efforts to send hearing notices to the respondent's correct address were inadequate," according to NPR, allowing for the mix-up to be resolved while other cases were heard.
Under Sessions's new order, critics fear that cases that could be held up by a pending application or appeal could end quickly with judges being forced to order immigrants' removal.
"There has been no example of situations in which the court has somehow abused its authority or somehow this has demonstrated to be an ineffective way of handling situations that come before the court," Judge Ashley Tabaddor, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, told NPR. "To eliminate administrative closure from the judge's toolkit for docket management is problematic."
"It's the epitome of bad docketing practice to take a whole group of cases, thousands of cases, that could be resolved by another agency and have them just sit and linger in court," Jeremy McKinney, national secretary for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told the Huffington Post. "Or worse than that, to deport people who are trying to go through the immigration system..."
Immigration lawyers will likely appeal quickly-made decisions to deport immigrants, McKinney added.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Immigrant rights advocates raised concerns on Friday about a decision reached by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, forbidding immigration judges from delaying hearings while immigrants await resolutions that could affect their cases--including their pending applications for visas and green cards. The move could reopen hundreds of thousands of deportation cases and result in the swift removal of many immigrants from the country.
Sessions issued the directive on Thursday, saying that judges' closing of cases through a practice called administrative closure "effectively resulted in illegal aliens remaining indefinitely in the United States without any formal legal status."
Critics say the decision was made only to further the Trump administration's goal of maximizing deportations.
"We know he is part of Trump's political agenda to rush cases through the system," Trina Realmuto of the American Immigration Council told the Huffington Post of Sessions. "But as the attorney general, as the head of the Department of Justice, as the person who is certifying immigration cases to himself, he needs to be neutral, impartial and he needs to adjudicate without a political agenda."
Immigration judges have for years used administrative closure to delay court proceedings if an immigrant is awaiting approval of a visa application or appealing a criminal conviction, as outcomes of such proceedings could affect their immigration cases.
NPR's Joel Rose described administrative closure as "a lifeline for tens of thousands of immigrants," whose applications for visas and green cards can take years.
"So immigration judges will sometimes close their cases to let those applications play out, effectively putting deportations on hold," he said.
Other matters beyond immigrants' control have also driven judges to put hearings on hold. Sessions based his decision on three cases including one involving a Guatemalan immigrant, Reynaldo Castro-Tum, who arrived in the U.S. as a minor. Castro-Tum failed to appear at five immigration hearings, and the judge overseeing the case ordered administrative closure after determining "that the government's efforts to send hearing notices to the respondent's correct address were inadequate," according to NPR, allowing for the mix-up to be resolved while other cases were heard.
Under Sessions's new order, critics fear that cases that could be held up by a pending application or appeal could end quickly with judges being forced to order immigrants' removal.
"There has been no example of situations in which the court has somehow abused its authority or somehow this has demonstrated to be an ineffective way of handling situations that come before the court," Judge Ashley Tabaddor, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, told NPR. "To eliminate administrative closure from the judge's toolkit for docket management is problematic."
"It's the epitome of bad docketing practice to take a whole group of cases, thousands of cases, that could be resolved by another agency and have them just sit and linger in court," Jeremy McKinney, national secretary for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told the Huffington Post. "Or worse than that, to deport people who are trying to go through the immigration system..."
Immigration lawyers will likely appeal quickly-made decisions to deport immigrants, McKinney added.
Immigrant rights advocates raised concerns on Friday about a decision reached by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, forbidding immigration judges from delaying hearings while immigrants await resolutions that could affect their cases--including their pending applications for visas and green cards. The move could reopen hundreds of thousands of deportation cases and result in the swift removal of many immigrants from the country.
Sessions issued the directive on Thursday, saying that judges' closing of cases through a practice called administrative closure "effectively resulted in illegal aliens remaining indefinitely in the United States without any formal legal status."
Critics say the decision was made only to further the Trump administration's goal of maximizing deportations.
"We know he is part of Trump's political agenda to rush cases through the system," Trina Realmuto of the American Immigration Council told the Huffington Post of Sessions. "But as the attorney general, as the head of the Department of Justice, as the person who is certifying immigration cases to himself, he needs to be neutral, impartial and he needs to adjudicate without a political agenda."
Immigration judges have for years used administrative closure to delay court proceedings if an immigrant is awaiting approval of a visa application or appealing a criminal conviction, as outcomes of such proceedings could affect their immigration cases.
NPR's Joel Rose described administrative closure as "a lifeline for tens of thousands of immigrants," whose applications for visas and green cards can take years.
"So immigration judges will sometimes close their cases to let those applications play out, effectively putting deportations on hold," he said.
Other matters beyond immigrants' control have also driven judges to put hearings on hold. Sessions based his decision on three cases including one involving a Guatemalan immigrant, Reynaldo Castro-Tum, who arrived in the U.S. as a minor. Castro-Tum failed to appear at five immigration hearings, and the judge overseeing the case ordered administrative closure after determining "that the government's efforts to send hearing notices to the respondent's correct address were inadequate," according to NPR, allowing for the mix-up to be resolved while other cases were heard.
Under Sessions's new order, critics fear that cases that could be held up by a pending application or appeal could end quickly with judges being forced to order immigrants' removal.
"There has been no example of situations in which the court has somehow abused its authority or somehow this has demonstrated to be an ineffective way of handling situations that come before the court," Judge Ashley Tabaddor, president of the National Association of Immigration Judges, told NPR. "To eliminate administrative closure from the judge's toolkit for docket management is problematic."
"It's the epitome of bad docketing practice to take a whole group of cases, thousands of cases, that could be resolved by another agency and have them just sit and linger in court," Jeremy McKinney, national secretary for the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told the Huffington Post. "Or worse than that, to deport people who are trying to go through the immigration system..."
Immigration lawyers will likely appeal quickly-made decisions to deport immigrants, McKinney added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy